Skip to main content
A620-MAH72Dw G vs A605-MAH72Dw G 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw G vs AIKO AIKO-A605-MAH72Dw G

AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw G
AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw G
620 Wp 23.50 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
AIKO AIKO-A605-MAH72Dw G
AIKO-A605-MAH72Dw G
605 Wp 23.00 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

A620-MAH72Dw G leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.50 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter A620-MAH72Dw G A605-MAH72Dw G Difference
Module efficiency 23.50 % 23.00 % 0.50 pp more efficient
Power density 235.4 Wp/m² 229.7 Wp/m² 5.7 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 620 Wp 605 Wp 15 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
A620-MAH72Dw G
20,964 kWh
A605-MAH72Dw G
20,457 kWh
Lifetime gap
507 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario A620-MAH72Dw G A605-MAH72Dw G
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 620 W 605 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 593 W 579 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 566 W 552 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 539 W 526 W
03

Full specification

Parameter A620-MAH72Dw G A605-MAH72Dw G Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 620 Wp 605 Wp +15 W for A620-MAH72Dw G
Module efficiency 23.50 % 23.00 % +0.50 pp for A620-MAH72Dw G
Power density 235.4 Wp/m² 229.7 Wp/m² +5.7 Wp/m² for A620-MAH72Dw G
Open-circuit voltage 53.55 V 53.25 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 45.08 V 44.78 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.23 A 14.05 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.76 A 13.52 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2323x1134x35 mm 2323x1134x35 mm Same
Module area 2.634 m² 2.634 m² Same
Weight 33.0 kg 33.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 53.2 kg/kWp 54.5 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.35 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type N-type Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#716 vs #1,919
A620-MAH72Dw G leads by 1,203 places
Power density
#669 vs #2,176
A620-MAH72Dw G leads by 1,507 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,064 vs #8,872
A620-MAH72Dw G leads by 1,808 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,716 vs #2,455
A620-MAH72Dw G leads by 739 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw G vs AIKO AIKO-A625-MAH72Dw G
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw G vs AIKO AIKO-A615-MAH72Dw G
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw G vs AIKO AIKO-A610-MAH72Dw G
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw G vs AIKO AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw G vs AIKO AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw G vs AIKO AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw G or AIKO AIKO-A605-MAH72Dw G?
According to our database: AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw G has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 23.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw G and AIKO AIKO-A605-MAH72Dw G?
AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw G has a module efficiency of 23.50%, while AIKO AIKO-A605-MAH72Dw G is 23.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw G use vs AIKO AIKO-A605-MAH72Dw G?
AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw G uses N-type cells; AIKO AIKO-A605-MAH72Dw G uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw G and AIKO AIKO-A605-MAH72Dw G?
AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw G has a 30 years power warranty; AIKO AIKO-A605-MAH72Dw G has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw G and AIKO AIKO-A605-MAH72Dw G bifacial panels?
Both AIKO AIKO-A620-MAH72Dw G and AIKO AIKO-A605-MAH72Dw G are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 173 AIKO offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.