AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw vs Jinko Solar JKM460-485N-48QL6-DV-F2-EU (485W)
VS
The verdict
AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.53 pp more efficient. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 11 differencesHow alike are they
8
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
11 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw
JKM460-485N-48QL6-DV-F2-EU (485W)
Difference
Module efficiency
24.80 %
24.27 %
0.53 pp more efficient
Weight per kWp
42.4 kg/kWp
50.3 kg/kWp
7.9 kg/kWp lighter
Weight
21.0 kg
24.4 kg
3.4 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage
41.10 V
36.92 V
4.18 V apart
Power density
247.7 Wp/m²
242.7 Wp/m²
5.0 Wp/m² higher
Cell technology
Back Contact
N-type
Back Contact vs N-type
Rated power
495 Wp
485 Wp
10 W more power
Cell count
108
192
84 cells apart
Short-circuit current
15.00 A
15.95 A
0.95 A apart
Voltage at max power
34.50 V
31.48 V
3.02 V apart
Current at max power
14.35 A
15.41 A
1.06 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw
16,737 kWh
JKM460-485N-48QL6-DV-F2-EU (485W)
16,399 kWh
Lifetime gap
338 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw
JKM460-485N-48QL6-DV-F2-EU (485W)
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
495 W
485 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
96.1% of rated power
476 W
466 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
92.2% of rated power
456 W
447 W
Hot roof
70 °C
88.3% of rated power
437 W
428 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw
JKM460-485N-48QL6-DV-F2-EU (485W)
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
495 Wp
485 Wp
+10 W for AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw
Module efficiency
24.80 %
24.27 %
+0.53 pp for AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw
Power density
247.7 Wp/m²
242.7 Wp/m²
+5.0 Wp/m² for AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw
Open-circuit voltage
41.10 V
36.92 V
4.18 V apart
Voltage at max power
34.50 V
31.48 V
3.02 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.00 A
15.95 A
0.95 A apart
Current at max power
14.35 A
15.41 A
1.06 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
1.998 m²
1.998 m²
Same
Weight
21.0 kg
24.4 kg
-3.4 kg for AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw
Weight per kWp
42.4 kg/kWp
50.3 kg/kWp
-7.9 kg/kWp for AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
Back Contact
N-type
Back Contact vs N-type
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
192
84 cells apart
Bifacial
No
No
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#12
vs
#164
AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw leads by 152 places
Power density
#37
vs
#140
AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw leads by 103 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#219
vs
#3,707
AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw leads by 3,488 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,920
vs
#5,024
AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw leads by 1,104 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A490-MCE54Mw
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A480-MCE54Mw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A475-MCE54Mw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A470-MCE54Mw
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM460-485N-48QL6-DV-F2-EU (485W) vs Jinko Solar JKM460-485N-48QL6-DV-F2-EU (480W)
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw or Jinko Solar JKM460-485N-48QL6-DV-F2-EU (485W)?
According to our database: AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw has higher module efficiency (24.80% vs 24.27%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw and Jinko Solar JKM460-485N-48QL6-DV-F2-EU (485W)?
AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw has a module efficiency of 24.80%, while Jinko Solar JKM460-485N-48QL6-DV-F2-EU (485 W) is 24.27%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw use vs Jinko Solar JKM460-485N-48QL6-DV-F2-EU (485W)?
AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw uses Back Contact cells; Jinko Solar JKM460-485N-48QL6-DV-F2-EU (485 W) uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw and Jinko Solar JKM460-485N-48QL6-DV-F2-EU (485W)?
AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM460-485N-48QL6-DV-F2-EU (485 W) has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Shop prices: See 166 AIKO offers · See 160 Jinko Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.