Skip to main content
MD-120BS-445 vs AE CME-132 720 3 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

AE Solar MD-120BS-445 vs AE Solar AE CME-132 720

AE Solar MD-120BS-445
MD-120BS-445
445 Wp 20.65 % PERC Bifacial Incomplete
VS
AE Solar AE CME-132 720
AE CME-132 720
720 Wp 23.21 % TOPCon Incomplete
The verdict

AE CME-132 720 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 2.56 pp more efficient. 3 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 15 differences
How alike are they
3 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

15 of 18 parameters
Parameter MD-120BS-445 AE CME-132 720 Difference
Module efficiency 20.65 % 23.21 % 2.56 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.290 %/°C 0.060 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 445 Wp 720 Wp 275 W more power
Power density 206.5 Wp/m² 232.1 Wp/m² 25.6 Wp/m² higher
Weight 22.5 kg 31.5 kg 9.0 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 50.6 kg/kWp 43.8 kg/kWp 6.8 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 41.66 V 49.10 V 7.44 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.52 A 18.43 A 4.91 A apart
Module area 2.155 m² 3.103 m² 0.948 m² apart
Cell technology PERC TOPCon PERC vs TOPCon
Voltage at max power 34.87 V 41.30 V 6.43 V apart
Current at max power 12.76 A 17.43 A 4.67 A apart
Cell count 120 132 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Dimensions 1902x1133x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm 1902x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
MD-120BS-445
14,690 kWh
AE CME-132 720
24,157 kWh
Lifetime gap
9,467 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario MD-120BS-445 AE CME-132 720
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 445 W 720 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.8% of rated power 422 W 689 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.5% of rated power 398 W 657 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.2% of rated power 375 W 626 W
03

Full specification

Parameter MD-120BS-445 AE CME-132 720 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 445 Wp 720 Wp +275 W for AE CME-132 720
Module efficiency 20.65 % 23.21 % +2.56 pp for AE CME-132 720
Power density 206.5 Wp/m² 232.1 Wp/m² +25.6 Wp/m² for AE CME-132 720
Open-circuit voltage 41.66 V 49.10 V 7.44 V apart
Voltage at max power 34.87 V 41.30 V 6.43 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.52 A 18.43 A 4.91 A apart
Current at max power 12.76 A 17.43 A 4.67 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.290 %/°C +0.060 %/°C for AE CME-132 720
Mechanical
Dimensions 1902x1133x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm 1902x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Module area 2.155 m² 3.103 m² 0.948 m² apart
Weight 22.5 kg 31.5 kg -9.0 kg for MD-120BS-445
Weight per kWp 50.6 kg/kWp 43.8 kg/kWp -6.8 kg/kWp for AE CME-132 720
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology PERC TOPCon PERC vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 120 132 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#11,014 vs #1,299
AE CME-132 720 leads by 9,715 places
Power density
#10,993 vs #1,339
AE CME-132 720 leads by 9,654 places
Heat behaviour
#10,419 vs #2,165
AE CME-132 720 leads by 8,254 places
Weight
#3,950 vs #336
AE CME-132 720 leads by 3,614 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#7,513 vs #19
AE CME-132 720 leads by 7,494 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AE Solar MD-120BS-445 vs AE Solar MD-120BS-460
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar MD-120BS-445 vs AE Solar MD-120BS-455
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar MD-120BS-445 vs AE Solar MD-120BS-450
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar MD-120BS-445 vs AE Solar MD-120BS-440
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
6 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
7 differences, the largest is weight
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AE Solar MD-120BS-445 or AE Solar AE CME-132 720?
According to our database: AE Solar AE CME-132 720 has higher module efficiency (23.21% vs 20.65%); AE Solar AE CME-132 720 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar MD-120BS-445 and AE Solar AE CME-132 720?
AE Solar MD-120BS-445 has a module efficiency of 20.65%, while AE Solar AE CME-132 720 is 23.21%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar MD-120BS-445 use vs AE Solar AE CME-132 720?
AE Solar MD-120BS-445 uses PERC cells; AE Solar AE CME-132 720 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar MD-120BS-445 and AE Solar AE CME-132 720?
AE Solar MD-120BS-445 has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar AE CME-132 720 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar MD-120BS-445 and AE Solar AE CME-132 720 bifacial panels?
AE Solar MD-120BS-445 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AE Solar AE CME-132 720 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 5 AE Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.