Skip to main content
MD-120BD-450 vs AE ME-132 660W 3 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

AE Solar MD-120BD-450 vs AE Solar AE ME-132 660W

AE Solar MD-120BD-450
MD-120BD-450
450 Wp 20.88 % PERC Bifacial
VS
AE Solar AE ME-132 660W
AE ME-132 660W
660 Wp 21.27 % PERC Incomplete
The verdict

AE ME-132 660W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 210 W more power. 3 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 15 differences
How alike are they
3 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

15 of 18 parameters
Parameter MD-120BD-450 AE ME-132 660W Difference
Rated power 450 Wp 660 Wp 210 W more power
Weight 25.5 kg 31.5 kg 6.0 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 56.7 kg/kWp 47.7 kg/kWp 8.9 kg/kWp lighter
Product warranty 15 yrs 30 yrs 15 yrs longer
Module efficiency 20.88 % 21.27 % 0.39 pp more efficient
Short-circuit current 13.57 A 18.43 A 4.86 A apart
Module area 2.155 m² 3.103 m² 0.948 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage 41.98 V 45.90 V 3.92 V apart
Power density 208.8 Wp/m² 212.7 Wp/m² 3.9 Wp/m² higher
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.340 %/°C 0.010 %/°C better in heat
Current at max power 12.81 A 17.46 A 4.65 A apart
Cell count 120 132 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Voltage at max power 35.13 V 37.80 V 2.67 V apart
Dimensions 1902x1133x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm 1902x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
MD-120BD-450
15,098 kWh
AE ME-132 660W
22,144 kWh
Lifetime gap
7,046 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario MD-120BD-450 AE ME-132 660W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 450 W 660 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.8% of rated power 426 W 626 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.5% of rated power 403 W 593 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.2% of rated power 379 W 559 W
03

Full specification

Parameter MD-120BD-450 AE ME-132 660W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 450 Wp 660 Wp +210 W for AE ME-132 660W
Module efficiency 20.88 % 21.27 % +0.39 pp for AE ME-132 660W
Power density 208.8 Wp/m² 212.7 Wp/m² +3.9 Wp/m² for AE ME-132 660W
Open-circuit voltage 41.98 V 45.90 V 3.92 V apart
Voltage at max power 35.13 V 37.80 V 2.67 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.57 A 18.43 A 4.86 A apart
Current at max power 12.81 A 17.46 A 4.65 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.340 %/°C +0.010 %/°C for AE ME-132 660W
Mechanical
Dimensions 1902x1133x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm 1902x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Module area 2.155 m² 3.103 m² 0.948 m² apart
Weight 25.5 kg 31.5 kg -6.0 kg for MD-120BD-450
Weight per kWp 56.7 kg/kWp 47.7 kg/kWp -8.9 kg/kWp for AE ME-132 660W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 30 yrs +15 yrs for AE ME-132 660W
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.55 %/yr - Not published by AE Solar
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 120 132 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#10,320 vs #8,849
AE ME-132 660W leads by 1,471 places
Power density
#10,265 vs #8,718
AE ME-132 660W leads by 1,547 places
Heat behaviour
#10,419 vs #8,778
AE ME-132 660W leads by 1,641 places
Weight
#10,792 vs #1,829
AE ME-132 660W leads by 8,963 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#10,081 vs #784
AE ME-132 660W leads by 9,297 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AE Solar MD-120BD-450 vs AE Solar ME-132BD-660
12 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar MD-120BD-450 vs AE Solar AE ME-132BD-660
13 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar MD-120BD-450 vs AE Solar AE ME-132-660
15 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar MD-120BD-450 vs AE Solar ME-132-660
14 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar MD-120BD-450 vs AE Solar ME-132BD-655
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar MD-120BD-450 vs AE Solar AE ME-132 655W
14 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AE Solar MD-120BD-450 or AE Solar AE ME-132 660W?
According to our database: AE Solar AE ME-132 660 W has higher module efficiency (21.27% vs 20.88%); AE Solar AE ME-132 660 W tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.340%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar MD-120BD-450 and AE Solar AE ME-132 660W?
AE Solar MD-120BD-450 has a module efficiency of 20.88%, while AE Solar AE ME-132 660 W is 21.27%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar MD-120BD-450 use vs AE Solar AE ME-132 660W?
AE Solar MD-120BD-450 uses PERC cells; AE Solar AE ME-132 660 W uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar MD-120BD-450 and AE Solar AE ME-132 660W?
AE Solar MD-120BD-450 has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar AE ME-132 660 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar MD-120BD-450 and AE Solar AE ME-132 660W bifacial panels?
AE Solar MD-120BD-450 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AE Solar AE ME-132 660 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 4 AE Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.