Skip to main content
ICME-132BDS-650 vs AE ICME-132BDS-660 15 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

AE Solar ICME-132BDS-650 vs AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-660

AE Solar ICME-132BDS-650
ICME-132BDS-650
650 Wp 24.06 % Back Contact Bifacial Incomplete
VS
AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-660
AE ICME-132BDS-660
660 Wp 24.43 % Back Contact Bifacial
The verdict

AE ICME-132BDS-660 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.37 pp more efficient. 15 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
15 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

3 of 18 parameters
Parameter ICME-132BDS-650 AE ICME-132BDS-660 Difference
Module efficiency 24.06 % 24.43 % 0.37 pp more efficient
Power density 240.6 Wp/m² 244.3 Wp/m² 3.7 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 650 Wp 660 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
ICME-132BDS-650
21,809 kWh
AE ICME-132BDS-660
22,144 kWh
Lifetime gap
335 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario ICME-132BDS-650 AE ICME-132BDS-660
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 650 W 660 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.1% of rated power 625 W 634 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.2% of rated power 599 W 609 W
Hot roof 70 °C 88.3% of rated power 574 W 583 W
03

Full specification

Parameter ICME-132BDS-650 AE ICME-132BDS-660 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 650 Wp 660 Wp +10 W for AE ICME-132BDS-660
Module efficiency 24.06 % 24.43 % +0.37 pp for AE ICME-132BDS-660
Power density 240.6 Wp/m² 244.3 Wp/m² +3.7 Wp/m² for AE ICME-132BDS-660
Open-circuit voltage 49.72 V 49.92 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 40.98 V 41.18 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 16.54 A 16.70 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 15.86 A 16.03 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.260 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.701 m² 2.701 m² Same
Weight 33.5 kg 33.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 51.5 kg/kWp 50.8 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - 0.35 %/yr Not published by AE Solar
Technology
Cell technology Back Contact Back Contact Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#268 vs #87
AE ICME-132BDS-660 leads by 181 places
Power density
#233 vs #88
AE ICME-132BDS-660 leads by 145 places
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,914 vs #4,172
AE ICME-132BDS-660 leads by 742 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#907 vs #559
AE ICME-132BDS-660 leads by 348 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AE Solar ICME-132BDS-650 vs AE Solar ICME-132BDS-660
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar ICME-132BDS-650 vs AE Solar ICME-132BDS-655
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar ICME-132BDS-650 vs AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-655
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar ICME-132BDS-650 vs AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-650
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar ICME-132BDS-650 vs AE Solar ICME-132BDS-645
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar ICME-132BDS-650 vs AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-645
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AE Solar ICME-132BDS-650 or AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-660?
According to our database: AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-660 has higher module efficiency (24.43% vs 24.06%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar ICME-132BDS-650 and AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-660?
AE Solar ICME-132BDS-650 has a module efficiency of 24.06%, while AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-660 is 24.43%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar ICME-132BDS-650 use vs AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-660?
AE Solar ICME-132BDS-650 uses Back Contact cells; AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-660 uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar ICME-132BDS-650 and AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-660?
AE Solar ICME-132BDS-650 has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-660 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar ICME-132BDS-650 and AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-660 bifacial panels?
Both AE Solar ICME-132BDS-650 and AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-660 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 AE Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.