AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH
VS
The verdict
CME-132BDS-730 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.060 %/°C better in heat. 11 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 7 differencesHow alike are they
11
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
7 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
CME-132BDS-730
YH720W-33MHD/MH
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
0.060 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency
23.53 %
23.18 %
0.35 pp more efficient
Power density
235.3 Wp/m²
231.8 Wp/m²
3.5 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
730 Wp
720 Wp
10 W more power
Weight per kWp
50.7 kg/kWp
52.8 kg/kWp
2.1 kg/kWp lighter
Weight
37.0 kg
38.0 kg
1.0 kg lighter
Dimensions
2383x1302x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2383x1302x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
CME-132BDS-730
24,493 kWh
YH720W-33MHD/MH
24,157 kWh
Lifetime gap
336 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
CME-132BDS-730
YH720W-33MHD/MH
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
730 W
720 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.8% of rated power
698 W
682 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.5% of rated power
666 W
644 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.2% of rated power
635 W
607 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
CME-132BDS-730
YH720W-33MHD/MH
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
730 Wp
720 Wp
+10 W for CME-132BDS-730
Module efficiency
23.53 %
23.18 %
+0.35 pp for CME-132BDS-730
Power density
235.3 Wp/m²
231.8 Wp/m²
+3.5 Wp/m² for CME-132BDS-730
Open-circuit voltage
49.50 V
49.82 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
41.70 V
41.52 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
18.49 A
18.13 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
17.51 A
17.34 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
+0.060 %/°C for CME-132BDS-730
Mechanical
Dimensions
2383x1302x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2383x1302x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
3.103 m²
3.106 m²
Effectively the same
Weight
37.0 kg
38.0 kg
-1.0 kg for CME-132BDS-730
Weight per kWp
50.7 kg/kWp
52.8 kg/kWp
-2.1 kg/kWp for CME-132BDS-730
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
-
Not published by IBC Solar
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#674
vs
#1,424
CME-132BDS-730 leads by 750 places
Power density
#672
vs
#1,347
CME-132BDS-730 leads by 675 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#10,419
CME-132BDS-730 leads by 8,254 places
Weight
#4,111
vs
#6,459
CME-132BDS-730 leads by 2,348 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#7
vs
#24
CME-132BDS-730 leads by 17 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720W
4 differences, the largest is product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-715
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 or IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH?
According to our database: AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 has higher module efficiency (23.53% vs 23.18%); AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 and IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 has a module efficiency of 23.53%, while IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH is 23.18%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 use vs IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 uses TOPCon cells; IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 and IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 has a 30 years power warranty; IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 and IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH bifacial panels?
Both AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 and IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 5 AE Solar offers · See 2 IBC Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.