Skip to main content
CME-132BDS-730 vs AE CMER-132BDS-630 12 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs AE Solar AE CMER-132BDS-630

AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
CME-132BDS-730
730 Wp 23.53 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
AE Solar AE CMER-132BDS-630
AE CMER-132BDS-630
630 Wp 23.34 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

CME-132BDS-730 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 100 W more power. 12 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 7 differences
How alike are they
12 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

7 of 19 parameters
Parameter CME-132BDS-730 AE CMER-132BDS-630 Difference
Rated power 730 Wp 630 Wp 100 W more power
Weight 37.0 kg 33.7 kg 3.3 kg lighter
Short-circuit current 18.49 A 16.09 A 2.40 A apart
Module area 3.103 m² 2.700 m² 0.403 m² apart
Weight per kWp 50.7 kg/kWp 53.5 kg/kWp 2.8 kg/kWp lighter
Current at max power 17.51 A 15.00 A 2.51 A apart
Dimensions 2383x1302x30 mm 2383x1133x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm vs 2383x1133x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
CME-132BDS-730
24,493 kWh
AE CMER-132BDS-630
21,138 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,355 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario CME-132BDS-730 AE CMER-132BDS-630
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 730 W 630 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 698 W 603 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 666 W 575 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 635 W 548 W
03

Full specification

Parameter CME-132BDS-730 AE CMER-132BDS-630 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 730 Wp 630 Wp +100 W for CME-132BDS-730
Module efficiency 23.53 % 23.34 % Effectively the same
Power density 235.3 Wp/m² 233.3 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 49.50 V 50.20 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.70 V 42.00 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.49 A 16.09 A 2.40 A apart
Current at max power 17.51 A 15.00 A 2.51 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2383x1302x30 mm 2383x1133x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm vs 2383x1133x30 mm
Module area 3.103 m² 2.700 m² 0.403 m² apart
Weight 37.0 kg 33.7 kg -3.3 kg for AE CMER-132BDS-630
Weight per kWp 50.7 kg/kWp 53.5 kg/kWp -2.8 kg/kWp for CME-132BDS-730
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#674 vs #943
CME-132BDS-730 leads by 269 places
Power density
#672 vs #996
CME-132BDS-730 leads by 324 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,111 vs #7,467
CME-132BDS-730 leads by 3,356 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#7 vs #310
CME-132BDS-730 leads by 303 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720W
4 differences, the largest is product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-715
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 or AE Solar AE CMER-132BDS-630?
According to our database: AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 has higher module efficiency (23.53% vs 23.34%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 and AE Solar AE CMER-132BDS-630?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 has a module efficiency of 23.53%, while AE Solar AE CMER-132BDS-630 is 23.34%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 use vs AE Solar AE CMER-132BDS-630?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar AE CMER-132BDS-630 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 and AE Solar AE CMER-132BDS-630?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar AE CMER-132BDS-630 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 and AE Solar AE CMER-132BDS-630 bifacial panels?
Both AE Solar CME-132BDS-730 and AE Solar AE CMER-132BDS-630 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 5 AE Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.