AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W vs AE Solar AE CMER-132BDS-630
VS
The verdict
8 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is rated power: 95 W more power. 11 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 8 differencesHow alike are they
11
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
8 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
CME-132BDS-725W
AE CMER-132BDS-630
Difference
Rated power
725 Wp
630 Wp
95 W more power
Product warranty
15 yrs
30 yrs
15 yrs longer
Weight
37.0 kg
33.7 kg
3.3 kg lighter
Short-circuit current
18.46 A
16.09 A
2.37 A apart
Module area
3.103 m²
2.700 m²
0.403 m² apart
Current at max power
17.47 A
15.00 A
2.47 A apart
Weight per kWp
51.0 kg/kWp
53.5 kg/kWp
2.5 kg/kWp lighter
Dimensions
2383x1302x30 mm
2383x1133x30 mm
2383x1302x30 mm vs 2383x1133x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
CME-132BDS-725W
24,325 kWh
AE CMER-132BDS-630
21,138 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,187 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
CME-132BDS-725W
AE CMER-132BDS-630
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
725 W
630 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
693 W
603 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
662 W
575 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
630 W
548 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
CME-132BDS-725W
AE CMER-132BDS-630
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
725 Wp
630 Wp
+95 W for CME-132BDS-725W
Module efficiency
23.37 %
23.34 %
Effectively the same
Power density
233.7 Wp/m²
233.3 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
49.30 V
50.20 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
41.50 V
42.00 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
18.46 A
16.09 A
2.37 A apart
Current at max power
17.47 A
15.00 A
2.47 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2383x1302x30 mm
2383x1133x30 mm
2383x1302x30 mm vs 2383x1133x30 mm
Module area
3.103 m²
2.700 m²
0.403 m² apart
Weight
37.0 kg
33.7 kg
-3.3 kg for AE CMER-132BDS-630
Weight per kWp
51.0 kg/kWp
53.5 kg/kWp
-2.5 kg/kWp for CME-132BDS-725W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
30 yrs
+15 yrs for AE CMER-132BDS-630
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#930
vs
#943
CME-132BDS-725W leads by 13 places
Power density
#923
vs
#996
CME-132BDS-725W leads by 73 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,382
vs
#7,467
CME-132BDS-725W leads by 3,085 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#249
vs
#310
CME-132BDS-725W leads by 61 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W vs AE Solar CME-132-725W
3 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W vs AE Solar AE CME-132 720
4 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720
One difference: product warranty
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W or AE Solar AE CMER-132BDS-630?
According to our database: AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 W has higher module efficiency (23.37% vs 23.34%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W and AE Solar AE CMER-132BDS-630?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 W has a module efficiency of 23.37%, while AE Solar AE CMER-132BDS-630 is 23.34%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W use vs AE Solar AE CMER-132BDS-630?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 W uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar AE CMER-132BDS-630 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W and AE Solar AE CMER-132BDS-630?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 W has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar AE CMER-132BDS-630 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W and AE Solar AE CMER-132BDS-630 bifacial panels?
Both AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 W and AE Solar AE CMER-132BDS-630 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 5 AE Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.