Skip to main content
725 vs 710 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-710

AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
CME-132BDS-725
725 Wp 23.37 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
AE Solar CME-132BDS-710
CME-132BDS-710
710 Wp 22.88 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

725 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.49 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter 725 710 Difference
Module efficiency 23.37 % 22.88 % 0.49 pp more efficient
Power density 233.7 Wp/m² 228.8 Wp/m² 4.8 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 725 Wp 710 Wp 15 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
725
24,325 kWh
710
23,822 kWh
Lifetime gap
503 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 725 710
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 725 W 710 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 693 W 679 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 662 W 648 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 630 W 617 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 725 710 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 725 Wp 710 Wp +15 W for 725
Module efficiency 23.37 % 22.88 % +0.49 pp for 725
Power density 233.7 Wp/m² 228.8 Wp/m² +4.8 Wp/m² for 725
Open-circuit voltage 49.30 V 48.70 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.50 V 40.90 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.46 A 18.37 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.47 A 17.36 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2383x1302x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm Same
Module area 3.103 m² 3.103 m² Same
Weight 37.0 kg 37.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 51.0 kg/kWp 52.1 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#930 vs #2,524
725 leads by 1,594 places
Power density
#923 vs #2,436
725 leads by 1,513 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,382 vs #5,590
725 leads by 1,208 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#11 vs #59
725 leads by 48 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720W
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-715
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 or AE Solar CME-132BDS-710?
According to our database: AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 has higher module efficiency (23.37% vs 22.88%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 and AE Solar CME-132BDS-710?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 has a module efficiency of 23.37%, while AE Solar CME-132BDS-710 is 22.88%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 use vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-710?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar CME-132BDS-710 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 and AE Solar CME-132BDS-710?
AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar CME-132BDS-710 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 and AE Solar CME-132BDS-710 bifacial panels?
Both AE Solar CME-132BDS-725 and AE Solar CME-132BDS-710 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 5 AE Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.