AE Solar AE440CMD-108BDE vs REC REC460AA PURE-RX
VS
The verdict
17 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.050 %/°C better in heat. 2 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 17 differencesHow alike are they
2
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
17 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
AE440CMD-108BDE
REC460AA PURE-RX
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.240 %/°C
0.050 %/°C better in heat
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
5 yrs longer
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.25 %/yr
0.15 %/yr slower
Product warranty
15 yrs
25 yrs
10 yrs longer
Module efficiency
22.57 %
22.10 %
0.47 pp more efficient
Weight
19.5 kg
22.7 kg
3.2 kg lighter
Rated power
440 Wp
460 Wp
20 W more power
Open-circuit voltage
38.95 V
65.70 V
26.75 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.12 A
8.88 A
5.24 A apart
Module area
1.950 m²
2.082 m²
0.132 m² apart
Weight per kWp
44.3 kg/kWp
49.3 kg/kWp
5.0 kg/kWp lighter
Power density
225.7 Wp/m²
220.9 Wp/m²
4.7 Wp/m² higher
Cell technology
TOPCon
HJT
TOPCon vs HJT
Voltage at max power
33.01 V
54.90 V
21.89 V apart
Current at max power
13.33 A
8.38 A
4.95 A apart
Cell count
108
88
20 cells apart
Dimensions
1721x1133x30 mm
1728x1205x30 mm
1721x1133x30 mm vs 1728x1205x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
AE440CMD-108BDE
14,763 kWh
REC460AA PURE-RX
15,628 kWh
Lifetime gap
865 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
AE440CMD-108BDE
REC460AA PURE-RX
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
440 W
460 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
421 W
443 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
402 W
427 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
383 W
410 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
AE440CMD-108BDE
REC460AA PURE-RX
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
440 Wp
460 Wp
+20 W for REC460AA PURE-RX
Module efficiency
22.57 %
22.10 %
+0.47 pp for AE440CMD-108BDE
Power density
225.7 Wp/m²
220.9 Wp/m²
+4.7 Wp/m² for AE440CMD-108BDE
Open-circuit voltage
38.95 V
65.70 V
26.75 V apart
Voltage at max power
33.01 V
54.90 V
21.89 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.12 A
8.88 A
5.24 A apart
Current at max power
13.33 A
8.38 A
4.95 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.240 %/°C
+0.050 %/°C for REC460AA PURE-RX
Mechanical
Dimensions
1721x1133x30 mm
1728x1205x30 mm
1721x1133x30 mm vs 1728x1205x30 mm
Module area
1.950 m²
2.082 m²
0.132 m² apart
Weight
19.5 kg
22.7 kg
-3.2 kg for AE440CMD-108BDE
Weight per kWp
44.3 kg/kWp
49.3 kg/kWp
-5.0 kg/kWp for AE440CMD-108BDE
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
25 yrs
+10 yrs for REC460AA PURE-RX
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
+5 yrs for AE440CMD-108BDE
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.25 %/yr
-0.15 %/yr for REC460AA PURE-RX
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
HJT
TOPCon vs HJT
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
88
20 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#3,882
vs
#6,012
AE440CMD-108BDE leads by 2,130 places
Power density
#3,848
vs
#6,007
AE440CMD-108BDE leads by 2,159 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#13
REC460AA PURE-RX leads by 2,152 places
Weight
#422
vs
#2,871
AE440CMD-108BDE leads by 2,449 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#9,798
AE440CMD-108BDE leads by 9,777 places
Overall
#8,577
vs
#7,381
REC460AA PURE-RX leads by 1,196 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE440CMD-108BDE vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE440CMD-108BDE vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE440CMD-108BDE vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE440CMD-108BDE vs AE Solar CME-132-725W
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE440CMD-108BDE vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE440CMD-108BDE vs AE Solar AE CME-132 720
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AE Solar AE440CMD-108BDE or REC REC460AA PURE-RX?
According to our database: AE Solar AE440CMD-108BDE has higher module efficiency (22.57% vs 22.10%); REC REC460AA PURE-RX tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar AE440CMD-108BDE and REC REC460AA PURE-RX?
AE Solar AE440CMD-108BDE has a module efficiency of 22.57%, while REC REC460AA PURE-RX is 22.10%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar AE440CMD-108BDE use vs REC REC460AA PURE-RX?
AE Solar AE440CMD-108BDE uses TOPCon cells; REC REC460AA PURE-RX uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar AE440CMD-108BDE and REC REC460AA PURE-RX?
AE Solar AE440CMD-108BDE has a 30 years power warranty; REC REC460AA PURE-RX has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar AE440CMD-108BDE and REC REC460AA PURE-RX bifacial panels?
Both AE Solar AE440CMD-108BDE and REC REC460AA PURE-RX are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 5 AE Solar offers · See 7 REC offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

