AE Solar AE ICMD-108BDE 490W vs AE Solar ICME-132BDS-660
VS
The verdict
13 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is rated power: 170 W more power. 5 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
13 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
AE ICMD-108BDE 490W
ICME-132BDS-660
Difference
Rated power
490 Wp
660 Wp
170 W more power
Weight
23.5 kg
33.5 kg
10.0 kg lighter
Product warranty
30 yrs
15 yrs
15 yrs longer
Module efficiency
24.00 %
24.43 %
0.43 pp more efficient
Open-circuit voltage
40.75 V
49.92 V
9.17 V apart
Module area
2.041 m²
2.701 m²
0.660 m² apart
Short-circuit current
15.18 A
16.70 A
1.52 A apart
Power density
240.1 Wp/m²
244.3 Wp/m²
4.3 Wp/m² higher
Weight per kWp
48.0 kg/kWp
50.8 kg/kWp
2.8 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power
33.73 V
41.18 V
7.45 V apart
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Current at max power
14.53 A
16.03 A
1.50 A apart
Dimensions
1800x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
1800x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
AE ICMD-108BDE 490W
16,440 kWh
ICME-132BDS-660
22,144 kWh
Lifetime gap
5,704 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
AE ICMD-108BDE 490W
ICME-132BDS-660
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
490 W
660 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
96.1% of rated power
471 W
634 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
92.2% of rated power
452 W
609 W
Hot roof
70 °C
88.3% of rated power
433 W
583 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
AE ICMD-108BDE 490W
ICME-132BDS-660
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
490 Wp
660 Wp
+170 W for ICME-132BDS-660
Module efficiency
24.00 %
24.43 %
+0.43 pp for ICME-132BDS-660
Power density
240.1 Wp/m²
244.3 Wp/m²
+4.3 Wp/m² for ICME-132BDS-660
Open-circuit voltage
40.75 V
49.92 V
9.17 V apart
Voltage at max power
33.73 V
41.18 V
7.45 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.18 A
16.70 A
1.52 A apart
Current at max power
14.53 A
16.03 A
1.50 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1800x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
1800x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.041 m²
2.701 m²
0.660 m² apart
Weight
23.5 kg
33.5 kg
-10.0 kg for AE ICMD-108BDE 490W
Weight per kWp
48.0 kg/kWp
50.8 kg/kWp
-2.8 kg/kWp for AE ICMD-108BDE 490W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
15 yrs
+15 yrs for AE ICMD-108BDE 490W
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology
Back Contact
Back Contact
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#303
vs
#87
ICME-132BDS-660 leads by 216 places
Power density
#313
vs
#88
ICME-132BDS-660 leads by 225 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#1,984
vs
#4,172
AE ICMD-108BDE 490W leads by 2,188 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,149
vs
#559
ICME-132BDS-660 leads by 1,590 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE ICMD-108BDE 490W vs AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-660
13 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE ICMD-108BDE 490W vs AE Solar ICME-132BDS-655
12 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE ICMD-108BDE 490W vs AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-655
12 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE ICMD-108BDE 490W vs AE Solar ICME-132BDS-650
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE ICMD-108BDE 490W vs AE Solar AE ICME-132BDS-650
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE ICMD-108BDE 490W vs AE Solar ICME-132BDS-645
11 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AE Solar AE ICMD-108BDE 490W or AE Solar ICME-132BDS-660?
According to our database: AE Solar ICME-132BDS-660 has higher module efficiency (24.43% vs 24.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar AE ICMD-108BDE 490W and AE Solar ICME-132BDS-660?
AE Solar AE ICMD-108BDE 490 W has a module efficiency of 24.00%, while AE Solar ICME-132BDS-660 is 24.43%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar AE ICMD-108BDE 490W use vs AE Solar ICME-132BDS-660?
AE Solar AE ICMD-108BDE 490 W uses Back Contact cells; AE Solar ICME-132BDS-660 uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar AE ICMD-108BDE 490W and AE Solar ICME-132BDS-660?
AE Solar AE ICMD-108BDE 490 W has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar ICME-132BDS-660 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar AE ICMD-108BDE 490W and AE Solar ICME-132BDS-660 bifacial panels?
Both AE Solar AE ICMD-108BDE 490 W and AE Solar ICME-132BDS-660 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 5 AE Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
