AE Solar AE CMER-108BDE-505W vs AE Solar AE CME-132 720
VS
The verdict
CME-132 720 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 215 W more power. 5 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
13 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
CMER-108BDE-505W
CME-132 720
Difference
Rated power
505 Wp
720 Wp
215 W more power
Weight
27.5 kg
31.5 kg
4.0 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
54.5 kg/kWp
43.8 kg/kWp
10.7 kg/kWp lighter
Module efficiency
22.74 %
23.21 %
0.47 pp more efficient
Open-circuit voltage
39.90 V
49.10 V
9.20 V apart
Short-circuit current
16.02 A
18.43 A
2.41 A apart
Module area
2.221 m²
3.103 m²
0.882 m² apart
Power density
227.4 Wp/m²
232.1 Wp/m²
4.7 Wp/m² higher
Voltage at max power
33.80 V
41.30 V
7.50 V apart
Current at max power
14.94 A
17.43 A
2.49 A apart
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Dimensions
1960x1133x30 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
1960x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
CMER-108BDE-505W
16,944 kWh
CME-132 720
24,157 kWh
Lifetime gap
7,213 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
CMER-108BDE-505W
CME-132 720
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
505 W
720 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
483 W
689 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
461 W
657 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
439 W
626 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
CMER-108BDE-505W
CME-132 720
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
505 Wp
720 Wp
+215 W for CME-132 720
Module efficiency
22.74 %
23.21 %
+0.47 pp for CME-132 720
Power density
227.4 Wp/m²
232.1 Wp/m²
+4.7 Wp/m² for CME-132 720
Open-circuit voltage
39.90 V
49.10 V
9.20 V apart
Voltage at max power
33.80 V
41.30 V
7.50 V apart
Short-circuit current
16.02 A
18.43 A
2.41 A apart
Current at max power
14.94 A
17.43 A
2.49 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1960x1133x30 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
1960x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Module area
2.221 m²
3.103 m²
0.882 m² apart
Weight
27.5 kg
31.5 kg
-4.0 kg for CMER-108BDE-505W
Weight per kWp
54.5 kg/kWp
43.8 kg/kWp
-10.7 kg/kWp for CME-132 720
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#3,210
vs
#1,299
CME-132 720 leads by 1,911 places
Power density
#3,193
vs
#1,339
CME-132 720 leads by 1,854 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,802
vs
#336
CME-132 720 leads by 8,466 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,081
vs
#19
CME-132 720 leads by 3,062 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CMER-108BDE-505W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CMER-108BDE-505W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CMER-108BDE-505W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
12 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CMER-108BDE-505W vs AE Solar CME-132-725W
14 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CMER-108BDE-505W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W
13 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CMER-108BDE-505W vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720
12 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AE Solar AE CMER-108BDE-505W or AE Solar AE CME-132 720?
According to our database: AE Solar AE CME-132 720 has higher module efficiency (23.21% vs 22.74%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar AE CMER-108BDE-505W and AE Solar AE CME-132 720?
AE Solar AE CMER-108BDE-505 W has a module efficiency of 22.74%, while AE Solar AE CME-132 720 is 23.21%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar AE CMER-108BDE-505W use vs AE Solar AE CME-132 720?
AE Solar AE CMER-108BDE-505 W uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar AE CME-132 720 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar AE CMER-108BDE-505W and AE Solar AE CME-132 720?
AE Solar AE CMER-108BDE-505 W has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar AE CME-132 720 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar AE CMER-108BDE-505W and AE Solar AE CME-132 720 bifacial panels?
AE Solar AE CMER-108BDE-505 W is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AE Solar AE CME-132 720 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 5 AE Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.