AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M
VS
The verdict
GK-4-78HGBD-780M leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.09 pp more efficient. 2 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 16 differencesHow alike are they
2
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
16 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
AE CME-132 720
GK-4-78HGBD-780M
Difference
Module efficiency
23.21 %
24.30 %
1.09 pp more efficient
Rated power
720 Wp
780 Wp
60 W more power
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Power density
232.1 Wp/m²
242.8 Wp/m²
10.8 Wp/m² higher
Weight
31.5 kg
38.7 kg
7.2 kg lighter
Product warranty
30 yrs
15 yrs
15 yrs longer
Weight per kWp
43.8 kg/kWp
49.6 kg/kWp
5.9 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage
49.10 V
58.92 V
9.82 V apart
Module area
3.103 m²
3.212 m²
0.109 m² apart
Short-circuit current
18.43 A
16.78 A
1.65 A apart
Cell technology
TOPCon
Back Contact
TOPCon vs Back Contact
Voltage at max power
41.30 V
48.97 V
7.67 V apart
Cell count
132
156
24 cells apart
Current at max power
17.43 A
15.93 A
1.50 A apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
2383x1302x30 mm
2465x1303x33 mm
2383x1302x30 mm vs 2465x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
AE CME-132 720
24,157 kWh
GK-4-78HGBD-780M
26,171 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,014 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
AE CME-132 720
GK-4-78HGBD-780M
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
720 W
780 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
689 W
750 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
657 W
719 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
626 W
689 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
AE CME-132 720
GK-4-78HGBD-780M
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
720 Wp
780 Wp
+60 W for GK-4-78HGBD-780M
Module efficiency
23.21 %
24.30 %
+1.09 pp for GK-4-78HGBD-780M
Power density
232.1 Wp/m²
242.8 Wp/m²
+10.8 Wp/m² for GK-4-78HGBD-780M
Open-circuit voltage
49.10 V
58.92 V
9.82 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.30 V
48.97 V
7.67 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.43 A
16.78 A
1.65 A apart
Current at max power
17.43 A
15.93 A
1.50 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for GK-4-78HGBD-780M
Mechanical
Dimensions
2383x1302x30 mm
2465x1303x33 mm
2383x1302x30 mm vs 2465x1303x33 mm
Module area
3.103 m²
3.212 m²
0.109 m² apart
Weight
31.5 kg
38.7 kg
-7.2 kg for AE CME-132 720
Weight per kWp
43.8 kg/kWp
49.6 kg/kWp
-5.9 kg/kWp for AE CME-132 720
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
15 yrs
+15 yrs for AE CME-132 720
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
0.35 %/yr
Not published by AE Solar
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
Back Contact
TOPCon vs Back Contact
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
156
24 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,299
vs
#131
GK-4-78HGBD-780M leads by 1,168 places
Power density
#1,339
vs
#138
GK-4-78HGBD-780M leads by 1,201 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#511
GK-4-78HGBD-780M leads by 1,654 places
Weight
#336
vs
#3,161
AE CME-132 720 leads by 2,825 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#19
vs
#15
GK-4-78HGBD-780M leads by 4 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
6 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
7 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
3 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs AE Solar CME-132-725W
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W
4 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720
3 differences, the largest is weight
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: AE Solar AE CME-132 720 or Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M?
According to our database: Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M has higher module efficiency (24.30% vs 23.21%); Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar AE CME-132 720 and Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M?
AE Solar AE CME-132 720 has a module efficiency of 23.21%, while Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M is 24.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar AE CME-132 720 use vs Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M?
AE Solar AE CME-132 720 uses TOPCon cells; Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar AE CME-132 720 and Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M?
AE Solar AE CME-132 720 has a 30 years power warranty; Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar AE CME-132 720 and Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M bifacial panels?
Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AE Solar AE CME-132 720 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 4 AE Solar offers · See 7 Gokin offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

