Skip to main content
AE CME-132-720 vs MS730N-HJTGB 7 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

AE Solar AE CME-132-720 vs MY Solar MS730N-HJTGB

AE Solar AE CME-132-720
AE CME-132-720
720 Wp 23.21 % TOPCon
VS
MY Solar
MS730N-HJTGB
730 Wp 23.50 % HJT Bifacial Incomplete
The verdict

11 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.050 %/°C better in heat. 7 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 11 differences
How alike are they
7 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

11 of 18 parameters
Parameter AE CME-132-720 MS730N-HJTGB Difference
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.240 %/°C 0.050 %/°C better in heat
Weight 31.5 kg 38.3 kg 6.8 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 43.8 kg/kWp 52.5 kg/kWp 8.7 kg/kWp lighter
Module efficiency 23.21 % 23.50 % 0.29 pp more efficient
Cell technology TOPCon HJT TOPCon vs HJT
Rated power 720 Wp 730 Wp 10 W more power
Open-circuit voltage 49.10 V 51.05 V 1.95 V apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Short-circuit current 18.43 A 17.81 A 0.62 A apart
Dimensions 2383x1302x30 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2383x1302x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Voltage at max power 41.30 V 42.97 V 1.67 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
AE CME-132-720
24,157 kWh
MS730N-HJTGB
24,493 kWh
Lifetime gap
336 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario AE CME-132-720 MS730N-HJTGB
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 720 W 730 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 689 W 704 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 657 W 677 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 626 W 651 W
03

Full specification

Parameter AE CME-132-720 MS730N-HJTGB Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 720 Wp 730 Wp +10 W for MS730N-HJTGB
Module efficiency 23.21 % 23.50 % +0.29 pp for MS730N-HJTGB
Power density 232.1 Wp/m² 235.0 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 49.10 V 51.05 V 1.95 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.30 V 42.97 V 1.67 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.43 A 17.81 A 0.62 A apart
Current at max power 17.43 A 16.99 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.240 %/°C +0.050 %/°C for MS730N-HJTGB
Mechanical
Dimensions 2383x1302x30 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2383x1302x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area 3.103 m² 3.106 m² Effectively the same
Weight 31.5 kg 38.3 kg -6.8 kg for AE CME-132-720
Weight per kWp 43.8 kg/kWp 52.5 kg/kWp -8.7 kg/kWp for AE CME-132-720
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr - Not published by MY Solar
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon HJT TOPCon vs HJT
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,299 vs #716
MS730N-HJTGB leads by 583 places
Power density
#1,339 vs #800
MS730N-HJTGB leads by 539 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #13
MS730N-HJTGB leads by 2,152 places
Weight
#336 vs #5,993
AE CME-132-720 leads by 5,657 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#19 vs #8
MS730N-HJTGB leads by 11 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132-720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
6 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132-720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
7 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132-720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
3 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132-720 vs AE Solar CME-132-725W
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132-720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725W
4 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132-720 vs AE Solar AE CME-132 720
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AE Solar AE CME-132-720 or MY Solar MS730N-HJTGB?
According to our database: MY Solar MS730N-HJTGB has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 23.21%); MY Solar MS730N-HJTGB tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AE Solar AE CME-132-720 and MY Solar MS730N-HJTGB?
AE Solar AE CME-132-720 has a module efficiency of 23.21%, while MY Solar MS730N-HJTGB is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AE Solar AE CME-132-720 use vs MY Solar MS730N-HJTGB?
AE Solar AE CME-132-720 uses TOPCon cells; MY Solar MS730N-HJTGB uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AE Solar AE CME-132-720 and MY Solar MS730N-HJTGB?
AE Solar AE CME-132-720 has a 30 years power warranty; MY Solar MS730N-HJTGB has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AE Solar AE CME-132-720 and MY Solar MS730N-HJTGB bifacial panels?
MY Solar MS730N-HJTGB is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AE Solar AE CME-132-720 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Compare AE Solar and MY Solar as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 5 AE Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.