Skip to main content
ASM-M12-132-650 vs AB-G12R-132-630 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 vs Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630

Adani Solar
ASM-M12-132-650
650 Wp 20.87 % PERC
VS
Adani Solar
AB-G12R-132-630
630 Wp 23.34 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

AB-G12R-132-630 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 2.47 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter ASM-M12-132-650 AB-G12R-132-630 Difference
Module efficiency 20.87 % 23.34 % 2.47 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.280 %/°C 0.060 %/°C better in heat
Power density 208.7 Wp/m² 233.4 Wp/m² 24.7 Wp/m² higher
Annual degradation 0.55 %/yr 0.40 %/yr 0.15 %/yr slower
Rated power 650 Wp 630 Wp 20 W more power
Open-circuit voltage 43.66 V 48.80 V 5.14 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.85 A 15.94 A 2.91 A apart
Module area 3.114 m² 2.699 m² 0.415 m² apart
Cell technology PERC TOPCon PERC vs TOPCon
Voltage at max power 37.32 V 41.72 V 4.40 V apart
Current at max power 17.44 A 15.11 A 2.33 A apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Dimensions 2390x1303x35 mm 2382x1133x30 mm 2390x1303x35 mm vs 2382x1133x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
ASM-M12-132-650
21,066 kWh
AB-G12R-132-630
21,138 kWh
Lifetime gap
72 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario ASM-M12-132-650 AB-G12R-132-630
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 650 W 630 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 617 W 604 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 584 W 577 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 551 W 551 W
03

Full specification

Parameter ASM-M12-132-650 AB-G12R-132-630 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 650 Wp 630 Wp +20 W for ASM-M12-132-650
Module efficiency 20.87 % 23.34 % +2.47 pp for AB-G12R-132-630
Power density 208.7 Wp/m² 233.4 Wp/m² +24.7 Wp/m² for AB-G12R-132-630
Open-circuit voltage 43.66 V 48.80 V 5.14 V apart
Voltage at max power 37.32 V 41.72 V 4.40 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.85 A 15.94 A 2.91 A apart
Current at max power 17.44 A 15.11 A 2.33 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.280 %/°C +0.060 %/°C for AB-G12R-132-630
Mechanical
Dimensions 2390x1303x35 mm 2382x1133x30 mm 2390x1303x35 mm vs 2382x1133x30 mm
Module area 3.114 m² 2.699 m² 0.415 m² apart
Weight 33.6 kg 33.6 kg Same
Weight per kWp 51.7 kg/kWp 53.3 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.55 %/yr 0.40 %/yr -0.15 %/yr for AB-G12R-132-630
Technology
Cell technology PERC TOPCon PERC vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#10,332 vs #943
AB-G12R-132-630 leads by 9,389 places
Power density
#10,297 vs #933
AB-G12R-132-630 leads by 9,364 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778 vs #1,309
AB-G12R-132-630 leads by 7,469 places
Weight
#5,075 vs #7,236
ASM-M12-132-650 leads by 2,161 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,920 vs #1,961
AB-G12R-132-630 leads by 1,959 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Adani Solar
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 vs Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-645
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Adani Solar
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 vs Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-640
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Adani Solar
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 vs Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-635
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Adani Solar
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 vs Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-630
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Adani Solar
Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630 vs Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-640
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Adani Solar
Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630 vs Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-635
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 or Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630?
According to our database: Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630 has higher module efficiency (23.34% vs 20.87%); Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 and Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630?
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 has a module efficiency of 20.87%, while Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630 is 23.34%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 use vs Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630?
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 uses PERC cells; Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 and Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630?
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 has a 30 years power warranty; Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 and Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630 bifacial panels?
Adani Solar AB-G12R-132-630 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.