--- title: "Yingli vs ZNShine - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Yingli vs ZNShine solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/yingli-vs-znshine" --- # Yingli vs ZNShine ZNShine has the broader catalog (212 vs 196 models). Yingli leads on peak efficiency at 24.10%. Yingli leans bifacial (57% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Yingli | ZNShine | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | China | | Headquarters | Baoding, Hebei | Suqian | | Founded | 1998 | 1988 | | Employees | 9000+ | 1,200 | | Annual capacity | 2.45 GW/year | 10 GW/year | | Tier 1 | yes | yes | | Listed | OTC Pink: YGEHY | NEEQ: 838463 | | Website | [http://www.yinglisolar.com](http://www.yinglisolar.com) | [http://www.znshinesolar.com](http://www.znshinesolar.com) | Yingli Solar, also known as Yingli Green Energy, is a leading solar energy company and one of the world's largest vertically integrated PV manufacturers. The company develops, manufactures, and sells PV modules to a wide range of markets. Yingli's mission is to provide affordable green energy for all. ZNShine Solar is a high-tech PV enterprise specializing in R&D, manufacturing, and sales of solar modules. They also provide integrated photovoltaic, battery storage, and green hydrogen solutions, as well as BIPV, rooftop solar, and utility-scale solar solutions with a commitment to boosting green electricity... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Yingli | ZNShine | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 196 | 212 | +16 | | Max Power | 735 W | 670 W | +65 W | | Avg Power | 524 W | 535 W | +11 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Yingli | ZNShine | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 24.10% | 22.83% | +1.27 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 21.28% | 21.35% | +0.07 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Yingli | ZNShine | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.330%/°C | -0.329%/°C | +0.001 | | Bifacial Share | 112 (57%) | 89 (42%) | +15 pp | | Avg Warranty | 27.9 yrs | 28.3 yrs | +0.4 yr | ## Efficiency distribution Yingli skews to higher efficiency: 21% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Yingli | ZNShine | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 30 (15.3%) | 5 (2.4%) | | 20-21% | 39 (19.9%) | 59 (27.8%) | | 21-22% | 42 (21.4%) | 101 (47.6%) | | 22-23% | 44 (22.4%) | 47 (22.2%) | | 23%+ | 41 (20.9%) | 0 | ## Power distribution Yingli offers more 600W+ panels (37% of lineup) | Power band | Yingli | ZNShine | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 32 (16.3%) | 6 (2.8%) | | 400-499W | 52 (26.5%) | 64 (30.2%) | | 500-599W | 39 (19.9%) | 99 (46.7%) | | 600-699W | 62 (31.6%) | 43 (20.3%) | | 700W+ | 11 (5.6%) | 0 | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (32%) Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (63%) | Technology | Yingli | ZNShine | | --- | --- | --- | | PERC | 63 (32.1%) | 134 (63.2%) | | N-type | 59 (30.1%) | 0 | | TOPCon | 54 (27.6%) | 78 (36.8%) | | Unknown | 20 (10.2%) | 0 | ## Top panels, Yingli | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [YL735CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl735cf66-f-2) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [YL730CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl730cf66-f-2) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [YL725CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl725cf66-f-2) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [YL720CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl720cf66-f-2) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [LF720M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf720m12n-66h-bf) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [YL715CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl715cf66-f-2) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [LF715M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf715m12n-66h-bf) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [YL710CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl710cf66-f-2) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [LF710M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf710m12n-66h-bf) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [LF705M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf705m12n-66h-bf) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, ZNShine | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [ZXM8-TP132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [ZXM8-TP132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [ZXM8-TP132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [ZXM8-TP132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Yingli is a Chinese solar manufacturer headquartered in Baoding, founded in 1998 by Miao Liansheng. By 2012 it had risen to become the world's largest module supplier by shipment volume, before a sustained debt crisis between 2014 and 2020 forced a creditor-led restructuring, a delisting from the New York Stock Exchange, and a significant reduction in workforce. Following the 2020 restructure, Yingli regained BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status in 2022 and has since added a new manufacturing facility in Tianjin to rebuild its production scale. ZNShine - also Chinese, but with a longer operating history dating back to 1988 - runs production bases in Changzhou, Suqian, and Dali with a combined stated capacity of around 10 GW per year, and has maintained consistent BloombergNEF Tier 1 status alongside a B-rating in PV Tech's separate bankability assessment. In terms of institutional footprint, ZNShine's larger current output and uninterrupted financial track record give it a measurable edge, though Yingli's globally recognized brand continues to carry weight in established markets. Yingli's current product range centers on its PANDA 3.0 PRO series of n-type TOPCon bifacial modules, with high-wattage configurations reaching up to 625 W and efficiencies confirmed by pv-magazine at around 22.4%. The lineup addresses residential rooftop, commercial, and specialty applications including offshore floating PV installations. ZNShine offers a comparably n-type-oriented portfolio that combines TOPCon bifacial panels with a more recently scaled HJT series reaching up to 750 W - a technology the company has moved into mass production. The HJT modules carry a temperature coefficient of -0.24%/°C, making them particularly well suited to large utility-scale ground-mount projects in hot or humid climates. ZNShine backs its panels with a 12-year product warranty and up to 30 years of performance guarantee on double-glass units, and distributes to buyers across more than 60 countries. For a typical international buyer evaluating a financially stable, technologically current supplier for utility-scale or large commercial projects, ZNShine currently presents the lower-risk profile: larger manufacturing scale, unbroken bankability credentials, and a confirmed portfolio that extends into high-wattage HJT. Yingli is a credible alternative for buyers with existing supply relationships or for markets where its historic brand recognition carries procurement value, and its TOPCon PANDA series is competitive on efficiency. Where the two brands overlap most directly - n-type bifacial modules for mid-to-large commercial projects - specifications are close enough that commercial terms, local technical support, and warranty enforcement confidence may matter more than the brand name alone. Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Yingli vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/yingli-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-znshine) - [Yingli vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/yingli-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-znshine) - [Yingli vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/yingli-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-znshine) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/yingli-vs-znshine Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.