---
title: "Waaree vs Yingli - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Waaree vs Yingli solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/waaree-vs-yingli"
---

# Waaree vs Yingli

Waaree has the broader catalog (222 vs 196 models). Yingli leads on peak efficiency at 24.10%. Yingli leans bifacial (57% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Waaree | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | India | China |
| Headquarters | Mumbai | Baoding, Hebei |
| Founded | 1990 | 1998 |
| Employees | 8500+ | 9000+ |
| Annual capacity | 13.3 GW/year | 2.45 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NSE: WAAREEENER | OTC Pink: YGEHY |
| Website | [https://www.waaree.com/](https://www.waaree.com/) | [http://www.yinglisolar.com](http://www.yinglisolar.com) |

Waaree Energies Ltd. is a leading global energy transition company committed to delivering innovative, high-quality solar and sustainable energy solutions. Established in 1990 and headquartered in Mumbai, India, the company operates across 20+ countries with an integrated portfolio that spans solar modules, EPC...

Yingli Solar, also known as Yingli Green Energy, is a leading solar energy company and one of the world's largest vertically integrated PV manufacturers. The company develops, manufactures, and sells PV modules to a wide range of markets. Yingli's mission is to provide affordable green energy for all.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Waaree | Yingli | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 222 | 196 | +26 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 735 W | +5 W |
| Avg Power | 371 W | 524 W | +153 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Waaree | Yingli | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.51% | 24.10% | +0.59 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 18.39% | 21.28% | +2.89 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Waaree | Yingli | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.362%/°C | -0.330%/°C | +0.032 |
| Bifacial Share | 85 (38%) | 112 (57%) | +19 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 21.7 yrs | 27.9 yrs | +6.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Yingli skews to higher efficiency: 21% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Waaree | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 139 (62.6%) | 30 (15.3%) |
| 20-21% | 47 (21.2%) | 39 (19.9%) |
| 21-22% | 14 (6.3%) | 42 (21.4%) |
| 22-23% | 13 (5.9%) | 44 (22.4%) |
| 23%+ | 9 (4.1%) | 41 (20.9%) |


## Power distribution

Yingli offers more 600W+ panels (37% of lineup)


| Power band | Waaree | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 124 (55.9%) | 32 (16.3%) |
| 400-499W | 35 (15.8%) | 52 (26.5%) |
| 500-599W | 36 (16.2%) | 39 (19.9%) |
| 600-699W | 20 (9.0%) | 62 (31.6%) |
| 700W+ | 7 (3.2%) | 11 (5.6%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (48%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (32%)


| Technology | Waaree | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 107 (48.2%) | 63 (32.1%) |
| Unknown | 88 (39.6%) | 20 (10.2%) |
| TOPCon | 12 (5.4%) | 54 (27.6%) |
| N-type | 8 (3.6%) | 59 (30.1%) |
| HJT | 7 (3.2%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Waaree


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [BiH-11-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [BiH-11-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [BiH-11-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [BiH-11-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [BiH-11-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [BiH-11-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [BiH-11-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Bi-68-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bi-68-665) | 665 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [WSMD-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-wsmd-665) | 665 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [WSMD-660](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-wsmd-660) | 660 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Yingli


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [YL735CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl735cf66-f-2) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [YL730CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl730cf66-f-2) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [YL725CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl725cf66-f-2) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [YL720CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl720cf66-f-2) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [LF720M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf720m12n-66h-bf) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [YL715CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl715cf66-f-2) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [LF715M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf715m12n-66h-bf) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [YL710CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl710cf66-f-2) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [LF710M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf710m12n-66h-bf) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [LF705M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf705m12n-66h-bf) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Waaree is an Indian solar module manufacturer headquartered in Mumbai, founded in 1989. The company has held Bloomberg BNEF Tier 1 status for 35 consecutive quarters and by late 2025 had expanded its global module manufacturing capacity to over 22 GW - approximately 20 GW across facilities in India and 2.6 GW at a US plant in Brookshire, Texas. In November 2025 Waaree became the first Indian manufacturer to exceed 1 GW of monthly module output. Yingli Solar is a Chinese manufacturer based in Baoding, Hebei province, established in 1998. Once among the world's largest PV producers, Yingli went through a severe financial restructuring between 2015 and 2020 in which Chinese creditors took equity positions in the reorganized entity. Following that restructuring, the company regained Bloomberg BNEF Tier 1 status; reported annual production capacity varies by source but is generally cited in the range of several GW, with a newer Tianjin facility contributing significantly. On the dimension of institutional stability and consistent bankability, Waaree currently holds the stronger position.

Waaree's product portfolio spans Mono PERC, N-type TOPCon, and HJT technologies. Its lineup - ranging roughly from 520 W to above 730 W - covers residential rooftop, commercial and industrial, and utility-scale ground-mount applications. The premium Plexus HJT series features bifacial dual-glass construction and module efficiencies confirmed by the manufacturer at around 22.9%. Yingli has focused its recent offering around the Panda 3.0 N-type TOPCon series. The Panda 3.0 Plus, reaching up to 720 Wp, targets utility-scale and large C&I projects, while the lighter Panda 3.0 Pro suits residential and smaller commercial rooftops; top-bin efficiency is quoted at up to 24.1% for flagship models. Yingli has stated intentions to grow its presence in European markets through 2025 and beyond.

For an international buyer evaluating both brands, Waaree is the more straightforward bankable choice today - its Tier 1 track record is uninterrupted, its manufacturing scale is expanding rapidly, and it carries no legacy of debt restructuring. Yingli's Panda 3.0 series is technically competitive and the brand retains wide recognition, but prospective buyers should verify local warranty support and the current financial health of any regional distribution entity before committing to large volumes. Where local Yingli support has been independently verified, the two brands are largely interchangeable at the module-specification level within the N-type TOPCon segment.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Waaree vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/waaree-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Yingli](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-yingli)
- [Waaree vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/waaree-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Yingli](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-yingli)
- [Waaree vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/waaree-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Yingli](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-yingli)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/waaree-vs-yingli

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.