--- title: "Waaree vs AIKO - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Waaree vs AIKO solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/waaree-vs-aiko" --- # Waaree vs AIKO Waaree has the broader catalog (222 vs 144 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Waaree leans bifacial (38% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Waaree | AIKO | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | India | China | | Headquarters | Mumbai | Shanghai | | Founded | 1990 | 2009 | | Employees | 8500+ | | | Annual capacity | 13.3 GW/year | | | Tier 1 | yes | yes | | Listed | NSE: WAAREEENER | SZSE: 600732 | | Website | [https://www.waaree.com/](https://www.waaree.com/) | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) | Waaree Energies Ltd. is a leading global energy transition company committed to delivering innovative, high-quality solar and sustainable energy solutions. Established in 1990 and headquartered in Mumbai, India, the company operates across 20+ countries with an integrated portfolio that spans solar modules, EPC... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Waaree | AIKO | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 222 | 144 | +78 | | Max Power | 730 W | 805 W | +75 W | | Avg Power | 371 W | 581 W | +211 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Waaree | AIKO | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 23.51% | 25.20% | +1.69 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 18.39% | 23.65% | +5.26 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Waaree | AIKO | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.362%/°C | -0.271%/°C | +0.091 | | Bifacial Share | 85 (38%) | 35 (24%) | +14 pp | | Avg Warranty | 21.7 yrs | 29.5 yrs | +7.8 yr | ## Efficiency distribution AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Waaree | AIKO | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 139 (62.6%) | 3 (2.1%) | | 20-21% | 47 (21.2%) | 3 (2.1%) | | 21-22% | 14 (6.3%) | 3 (2.1%) | | 22-23% | 13 (5.9%) | 12 (8.3%) | | 23%+ | 9 (4.1%) | 123 (85.4%) | ## Power distribution AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup) | Power band | Waaree | AIKO | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 124 (55.9%) | 2 (1.4%) | | 400-499W | 35 (15.8%) | 50 (34.7%) | | 500-599W | 36 (16.2%) | 5 (3.5%) | | 600-699W | 20 (9.0%) | 78 (54.2%) | | 700W+ | 7 (3.2%) | 9 (6.2%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (48%) Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%) | Technology | Waaree | AIKO | | --- | --- | --- | | PERC | 107 (48.2%) | 7 (4.9%) | | Unknown | 88 (39.6%) | 0 | | TOPCon | 12 (5.4%) | 0 | | N-type | 8 (3.6%) | 17 (11.8%) | | HJT | 7 (3.2%) | 0 | | Back Contact | 0 | 119 (82.6%) | | Flexible | 0 | 1 (0.7%) | ## Top panels, Waaree | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [BiH-11-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [BiH-11-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [BiH-11-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [BiH-11-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [BiH-11-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [BiH-11-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [BiH-11-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [Bi-68-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bi-68-665) | 665 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [WSMD-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-wsmd-665) | 665 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [WSMD-660](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-wsmd-660) | 660 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, AIKO | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary AIKO is a Chinese solar manufacturer that has built its market identity around proprietary ABC (All Back Contact) cell technology, placing all electrical contacts on the rear surface of the cell to maximize light absorption on the front. The company secured Bloomberg Tier 1 status in 2024 and is expanding aggressively, with a new factory in Jinan designed for up to 30 GW of combined cell and module capacity. Waaree Energies is an Indian manufacturer established in 1989 and headquartered in Mumbai, with a substantially longer commercial track record. Waaree has appeared on Bloomberg New Energy Finance's Tier 1 list for 35 consecutive quarters and became the first Indian company to earn PV Tech's ModuleTech Bankability 'A' rating. With over 22 GW of global manufacturing capacity - including a dominant base in India and a 2.6 GW footprint in the United States - Waaree holds the stronger institutional position of the two. AIKO's product lineup spans residential rooftop, commercial and industrial (C&I), ground-mount, and floating PV applications, all anchored in its ABC technology. The company has held the top spot in TaiyangNews module efficiency rankings for over 34 consecutive months and continues to push record efficiencies in mass production - including early-stage perovskite-silicon tandem research reaching 34.76% at the lab scale. Waaree fields a broad portfolio built on TOPCon and HJT technologies, with HJT modules reaching up to 23.5% efficiency. The company serves residential, utility-scale, and C&I buyers and is actively positioning itself for large European contracts as the EU Net-Zero Industry Act shifts procurement away from Chinese suppliers, giving Waaree a structural advantage in that region. For a buyer prioritizing leading-edge module efficiency - particularly in space-constrained rooftop settings - AIKO is a compelling choice, though its shorter track record warrants additional due diligence on long-term supply chain resilience. Waaree is the more conservative pick for developers and EPCs that require deep bankability references, a non-Chinese supply chain for European or US public procurement, and proven capacity to deliver at gigawatt scale. The two brands are not interchangeable: AIKO competes on technology leadership, while Waaree competes on institutional credibility, geographic diversification, and scale. Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Waaree vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/waaree-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko) - [Waaree vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/waaree-vs-aeet) - [AKCOME vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aiko) - [Waaree vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/waaree-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aiko) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/waaree-vs-aiko Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.