---
title: "Vikram Solar vs ZNShine - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Vikram Solar vs ZNShine solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/vikram-solar-vs-znshine"
---

# Vikram Solar vs ZNShine

ZNShine has the broader catalog (212 vs 202 models). Vikram Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.69%. Vikram Solar leans bifacial (74% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Vikram Solar | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | India | China |
| Headquarters | Kolkata | Suqian |
| Founded | 2005 | 1988 |
| Employees | 1,895 | 1,200 |
| Annual capacity | 9.5 GW/year | 10 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NSE, BSE: VIKRAMSOLR | NEEQ: 838463 |
| Website | [http://www.vikramsolar.com](http://www.vikramsolar.com) | [http://www.znshinesolar.com](http://www.znshinesolar.com) |

Vikram Solar Limited is a leading Indian solar photovoltaic (PV) module manufacturer and solar solutions provider. They offer engineering, procurement, construction (EPC), and operations & maintenance (O&M) services for solar plants. The company manufactures high-efficiency solar PV modules and has a pan-India...

ZNShine Solar is a high-tech PV enterprise specializing in R&D, manufacturing, and sales of solar modules. They also provide integrated photovoltaic, battery storage, and green hydrogen solutions, as well as BIPV, rooftop solar, and utility-scale solar solutions with a commitment to boosting green electricity...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Vikram Solar | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 202 | 212 | +10 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 670 W | +65 W |
| Avg Power | 553 W | 535 W | +19 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Vikram Solar | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.69% | 22.83% | +0.86 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.45% | 21.35% | +0.10 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Vikram Solar | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.334%/°C | -0.329%/°C | +0.005 |
| Bifacial Share | 150 (74%) | 89 (42%) | +32 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.6 yrs | 28.3 yrs | +0.4 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Vikram Solar skews to higher efficiency: 8% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Vikram Solar | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 11 (5.4%) | 5 (2.4%) |
| 20-21% | 42 (20.8%) | 59 (27.8%) |
| 21-22% | 106 (52.5%) | 101 (47.6%) |
| 22-23% | 27 (13.4%) | 47 (22.2%) |
| 23%+ | 16 (7.9%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Vikram Solar offers more 600W+ panels (42% of lineup)


| Power band | Vikram Solar | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 12 (5.9%) | 6 (2.8%) |
| 400-499W | 54 (26.7%) | 64 (30.2%) |
| 500-599W | 52 (25.7%) | 99 (46.7%) |
| 600-699W | 69 (34.2%) | 43 (20.3%) |
| 700W+ | 15 (7.4%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (75%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (63%)


| Technology | Vikram Solar | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 152 (75.2%) | 134 (63.2%) |
| N-type | 30 (14.9%) | 0 |
| HJT | 12 (5.9%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 8 (4.0%) | 78 (36.8%) |


## Top panels, Vikram Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-735-05) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-730-05) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-725-05) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-720-05) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-715-05) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-715-05) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-710-05) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-710-05) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, ZNShine


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ZXM8-TP132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [ZXM8-TP132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [ZXM8-TP132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [ZXM8-TP132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Vikram Solar is an Indian manufacturer headquartered in Kolkata, West Bengal, founded in 2005 by Gyanesh Chaudhary. The company launched module production in 2009 and has since grown into one of India's largest solar module producers, reaching a total nameplate capacity of 9.5 GW following the commissioning of its highly automated Vallam facility in Tamil Nadu in late 2025. Vikram Solar regained BloombergNEF Tier 1 status in Q1 2024, became publicly listed on India's BSE and NSE exchanges in August 2025, and supplies modules to customers in 32 countries through sales offices in Germany and the United States. ZNShine, formally ZNSHINE PV-TECH Co., Ltd., is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, whose parent company traces its roots to 1988 and which entered the solar PV business in 2006. ZNShine has held continuous BloombergNEF Tier 1 certification since 2013 and operates approximately 10 GW of annual capacity across production bases in Changzhou, Suqian, and Yunnan, with further expansion planned in Indonesia. ZNShine's longer uninterrupted Tier 1 track record and marginally larger production base give it a somewhat stronger institutional footprint in global project-finance circles.

Both companies have transitioned their core portfolios toward N-type cell technology. Vikram Solar offers the Hypersol series of TOPCon modules - recognized as a Kiwa PVEL Top Performer for the eighth time in 2025 - and the Suryava series of bifacial HJT panels reaching up to 725 W and a conversion efficiency of 23.34%, alongside legacy monocrystalline lines suited to cost-sensitive applications. The portfolio covers residential rooftop, commercial C&I, and utility-scale ground-mount use cases. ZNShine's current lineup centers on N-type TOPCon bifacial modules with efficiencies up to 22.5% across a broad wattage range, complemented by a high-power HJT bifacial offering reaching 750 W. A notable differentiator is ZNShine's proprietary graphene-coated glass, which the company claims improves energy yield in low-irradiance conditions and reduces soiling losses. Both manufacturers carry PVEL Top Performer recognition for module reliability.

For most international buyers, ZNShine's longer unbroken Tier 1 history and established European distribution channels make it a marginally lower-risk default for project financing. Vikram Solar is the stronger choice where Indian-origin supply chains are preferred or required - such as under domestic content mandates - and its HJT lineup is genuinely competitive at the premium-efficiency tier. In practice the two brands are broadly interchangeable for standard commercial and utility projects, and the final decision will typically hinge on local distributor relationships, delivered pricing, and specific wattage requirements rather than any meaningful quality gap between them.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Vikram Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/vikram-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-znshine)
- [Vikram Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/vikram-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-znshine)
- [Vikram Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/vikram-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-znshine)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/vikram-solar-vs-znshine

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.