---
title: "Vikram Solar vs AIKO - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Vikram Solar vs AIKO solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/vikram-solar-vs-aiko"
---

# Vikram Solar vs AIKO

Vikram Solar has the broader catalog (202 vs 144 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Vikram Solar leans bifacial (74% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Vikram Solar | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | India | China |
| Headquarters | Kolkata | Shanghai |
| Founded | 2005 | 2009 |
| Employees | 1,895 |  |
| Annual capacity | 9.5 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NSE, BSE: VIKRAMSOLR | SZSE: 600732 |
| Website | [http://www.vikramsolar.com](http://www.vikramsolar.com) | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) |

Vikram Solar Limited is a leading Indian solar photovoltaic (PV) module manufacturer and solar solutions provider. They offer engineering, procurement, construction (EPC), and operations & maintenance (O&M) services for solar plants. The company manufactures high-efficiency solar PV modules and has a pan-India...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Vikram Solar | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 202 | 144 | +58 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 805 W | +70 W |
| Avg Power | 553 W | 581 W | +28 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Vikram Solar | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.69% | 25.20% | +1.51 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.45% | 23.65% | +2.20 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Vikram Solar | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.334%/°C | -0.271%/°C | +0.063 |
| Bifacial Share | 150 (74%) | 35 (24%) | +50 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.6 yrs | 29.5 yrs | +0.9 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Vikram Solar | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 11 (5.4%) | 3 (2.1%) |
| 20-21% | 42 (20.8%) | 3 (2.1%) |
| 21-22% | 106 (52.5%) | 3 (2.1%) |
| 22-23% | 27 (13.4%) | 12 (8.3%) |
| 23%+ | 16 (7.9%) | 123 (85.4%) |


## Power distribution

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)


| Power band | Vikram Solar | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 12 (5.9%) | 2 (1.4%) |
| 400-499W | 54 (26.7%) | 50 (34.7%) |
| 500-599W | 52 (25.7%) | 5 (3.5%) |
| 600-699W | 69 (34.2%) | 78 (54.2%) |
| 700W+ | 15 (7.4%) | 9 (6.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (75%)

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)


| Technology | Vikram Solar | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 152 (75.2%) | 7 (4.9%) |
| N-type | 30 (14.9%) | 17 (11.8%) |
| HJT | 12 (5.9%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 8 (4.0%) | 0 |
| Back Contact | 0 | 119 (82.6%) |
| Flexible | 0 | 1 (0.7%) |


## Top panels, Vikram Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-735-05) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-730-05) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-725-05) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-720-05) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-715-05) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-715-05) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-710-05) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-710-05) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AIKO is a Chinese solar manufacturer headquartered in Guangdong province that entered BloombergNEF's Tier 1 module makers list in Q3 2024, marking its recognition as a bankable supplier by major project-finance institutions. The company has scaled aggressively, reaching approximately 20 GW of annual production capacity in early 2025. Vikram Solar is an Indian manufacturer founded in 2006 and headquartered in Kolkata, West Bengal. It first earned BloombergNEF Tier 1 status in 2014 - among the earliest non-Chinese manufacturers to achieve this distinction - and has maintained it for at least eight consecutive quarters as of late 2025. Vikram's manufacturing footprint grew from 4.5 GW in early 2025 to approximately 9.5 GW after commissioning its fully automated Vallam plant in Tamil Nadu in November 2025. On the strength of its longer and uninterrupted Tier 1 track record, Vikram Solar holds the more established institutional footprint.

AIKO's competitive identity is defined by its proprietary ABC (All Back Contact) cell technology - an N-type architecture that removes all front-side metal contacts, maximizing light capture and achieving module efficiencies of up to 25.6% in its fourth-generation INFINITE ULTRA series. ABC shipments reached 14.7 GW globally in 2025, with the technology commanding more than 21% market share in the European residential segment. AIKO serves residential rooftop, commercial and industrial, and utility-scale ground-mount customers across 79 countries, and has secured over 19 GW in utility-scale project awards. Vikram Solar anchors its current portfolio around N-type TOPCon bifacial modules under the Hypersol brand, with outputs of 615 W to 640 W and module efficiencies of up to 23.69%. The company operates across 39 countries and serves all three main market segments, with confirmed orders in India and Europe including a 200 MW supply agreement with AB Energia.

Buyers prioritizing peak panel efficiency and a rapidly expanding global supply network will find a clear technical argument for AIKO. Those for whom non-Chinese module origin, a longer bankability history, or domestic content compliance matters - particularly in markets such as the United States or India - will find Vikram Solar the stronger candidate. The two brands are not interchangeable: they occupy genuinely different positions on the efficiency-versus-origin spectrum, and the correct choice is project-specific.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Vikram Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/vikram-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko)
- [Vikram Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/vikram-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aiko)
- [Vikram Solar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/vikram-solar-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aiko)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/vikram-solar-vs-aiko

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.