---
title: "Trina Solar vs Zun Power - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Trina Solar vs Zun Power solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-zun-power"
---

# Trina Solar vs Zun Power

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 0 models). Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Trina Solar | Zun Power |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Canada |
| Headquarters | Changzhou | Montreal |
| Founded | 1997 | 2014 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) | [https://zunpower.ca/](https://zunpower.ca/) |

Zun Power is a leading solar panel manufacturer based in Montreal, Canada. They specialize in high-efficiency photovoltaic panels under their own brand, GMA Solar, designed for commercial, industrial, agricultural, and institutional projects. Zun Power's manufacturing operations are fully based in Montreal and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Trina Solar | Zun Power | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 340 | 0 | +340 |
| Max Power | 760 W | 0 W | +760 W |
| Avg Power | 520 W | 0 W | +520 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Trina Solar | Zun Power | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | - |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.71% | - |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Trina Solar | Zun Power | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.302%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 145 (43%) | 0 (0%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.2 yrs | - |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Trina Solar | Zun Power |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 22 (6.5%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 57 (16.8%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 83 (24.4%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 102 (30.0%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 76 (22.4%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Trina Solar | Zun Power |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 28 (8.2%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 142 (41.8%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 54 (15.9%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 72 (21.2%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 44 (12.9%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Trina Solar | Zun Power |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 248 (72.9%) | 0 |
| PERC | 75 (22.1%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 11 (3.2%) | 0 |
| N-type | 6 (1.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Trina Solar is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 1997 and headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province. It consistently ranks among the world's top five module producers, with annual manufacturing capacity exceeding 80 GW. By mid-2025 the company had shipped a cumulative total of more than 292 GW globally. Trina has held BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status for many consecutive quarters, and in 2025 it achieved a 100% bankability rating - unanimous recognition from all BNEF respondents - for the eighth time. Zun Power is a considerably smaller manufacturer headquartered in Montreal, Canada, operating also under the GMA Solar brand. It focuses on industrial-grade photovoltaic panels for the North American market, but does not appear on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list, and its annual production volume is not publicly disclosed in GW terms. On institutional footprint and global recognition, Trina Solar holds a commanding lead.

Trina Solar's core product lines are the Vertex S+ series, designed for residential and commercial rooftop installations, and the Vertex N series, which targets utility-scale ground-mount projects and large C&I deployments. The company has shifted its primary technology stack to n-type TOPCon - pv-magazine confirmed that its Vertex N i-TOPCon Ultra modules reach up to 485 W at 24.3% efficiency - and bifacial configurations are available across both lines. Zun Power covers a wide wattage range, from compact off-grid modules suited to RVs, boats, and remote installations to larger panels for commercial, agricultural, and municipal projects. According to ENF Solar listings, its catalog spans both PERC and TOPCon variants. The company positions its Canadian manufacturing and CSA certification as a differentiator for buyers who prioritize domestic supply chains and harsh-climate compliance under North American standards.

For most international buyers - particularly those structuring project finance on commercial or utility-scale assets - Trina Solar is the clear default, backed by verified BNEF Tier 1 bankability, a proven multi-decade track record, and the supply scale to meet large-volume procurement commitments. Zun Power is a credible niche choice for buyers in Canada who value local sourcing, direct manufacturer access, and CSA-certified products for smaller or specialized applications. The two brands are not interchangeable: Trina Solar competes at the top of the global market, while Zun Power serves a regional, lower-volume segment with a distinct North American focus.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Trina Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Zun Power](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-zun-power)
- [Trina Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Zun Power](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-zun-power)
- [Trina Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Zun Power](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-zun-power)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-zun-power

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.