---
title: "Trina Solar vs Zonergy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Trina Solar vs Zonergy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-zonergy"
---

# Trina Solar vs Zonergy

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 5 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Trina Solar | Zonergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Changzhou | Zigong, Sichuan |
| Founded | 1997 | 2007 |
| Employees |  | 201-300 |
| Annual capacity |  | null GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) | [http://www.zonergy.com](http://www.zonergy.com) |

Zonergy is a world-renowned enterprise specializing in smart microgrid integrated solutions. The company is committed to providing first-class smart micro-grid solutions for global customers, covering technology research and development, product production, sales and trade, engineering design and implementation, and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Trina Solar | Zonergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 340 | 5 | +335 |
| Max Power | 760 W | 460 W | +300 W |
| Avg Power | 520 W | 450 W | +70 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Trina Solar | Zonergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 21.16% | +3.64 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.71% | 20.70% | +1.01 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Trina Solar | Zonergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.302%/°C | -0.350%/°C | +0.048 |
| Bifacial Share | 145 (43%) | 0 (0%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.2 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +3.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Trina Solar | Zonergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 22 (6.5%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 57 (16.8%) | 4 (80.0%) |
| 21-22% | 83 (24.4%) | 1 (20.0%) |
| 22-23% | 102 (30.0%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 76 (22.4%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Trina Solar | Zonergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 28 (8.2%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 142 (41.8%) | 5 (100.0%) |
| 500-599W | 54 (15.9%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 72 (21.2%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 44 (12.9%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)


| Technology | Trina Solar | Zonergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 248 (72.9%) | 0 |
| PERC | 75 (22.1%) | 5 (100.0%) |
| Unknown | 11 (3.2%) | 0 |
| N-type | 6 (1.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Zonergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ZPM 460MH3-72](https://comparepv.com/panel/zonergy-zpm-460mh3-72) | 460 | 21.2 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [ZPM 455MH3-72](https://comparepv.com/panel/zonergy-zpm-455mh3-72) | 455 | 20.9 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [ZPM 450MH3-72](https://comparepv.com/panel/zonergy-zpm-450mh3-72) | 450 | 20.7 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [ZPM 445MH3-72](https://comparepv.com/panel/zonergy-zpm-445mh3-72) | 445 | 20.5 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [ZPM 440MH3-72](https://comparepv.com/panel/zonergy-zpm-440mh3-72) | 440 | 20.2 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Trina Solar is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu province, founded in 1997. Over more than two decades it has grown into one of the world's largest PV module producers, repeatedly confirmed as a Tier 1 manufacturer by BloombergNEF - most recently in Q1 2025, marking at least the eighth time it has achieved that bankability recognition. By mid-2025 the company had shipped more than 292 GW of solar modules cumulatively, with annual production capacity exceeding 80 GW. Zonergy Corporation was established in 2007 and is a Chinese energy conglomerate with operational ties to Zigong and the Tibet Autonomous Region. The company positions itself primarily as a smart microgrid and integrated energy solutions provider rather than a pure-play module manufacturer. No current BNEF Tier 1 listing for Zonergy has been confirmed in available public sources, which places it in a different risk category from a project-finance standpoint. In terms of institutional recognition and shipment scale, Trina Solar holds a considerably stronger global footprint.

Trina Solar's product range spans all major market segments. For residential rooftops, the Vertex S+ G3 dual-glass TOPCon series provides compact high-output panels, while commercial and industrial buyers can draw on a 670 W TOPCon module. At utility scale, the flagship Vertex N i-TOPCon Ultra reaches 760 W with a confirmed efficiency of 24.5%, with initial annual production capacity of 10 GW for that product line alone - figures corroborated by pv-magazine. Zonergy's catalog is broader in scope: it encompasses monocrystalline panels (including a 545 W module rated at up to 21.4% efficiency), residential and commercial energy storage systems, on-grid and off-grid inverters, and integrated communication power supplies. The company has a notable track record in large utility projects, including a 900 MW ground-mount installation in Pakistan under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor framework, as well as off-grid and microgrid deployments across Africa and Central Asia - pointing to an infrastructure-integrator identity more than a module-technology leader.

For a typical international buyer - a residential customer, a European commercial developer, or a utility-scale project sponsor seeking bankable equipment - Trina Solar is the more straightforward default. Its BNEF Tier 1 status simplifies project financing, and its TOPCon portfolio carries verified efficiency figures from independent sources. Zonergy remains a credible option for buyers in emerging markets or for integrated microgrid projects where a single vendor supplying panels, storage, and inverters provides a logistical advantage. The two companies are not interchangeable: Trina Solar is a global module leader with full-segment coverage, while Zonergy is a regional systems integrator with a module manufacturing arm.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Trina Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Zonergy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-zonergy)
- [Trina Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Zonergy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-zonergy)
- [Trina Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Zonergy](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-zonergy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-zonergy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.