---
title: "Trina Solar vs ZNShine - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Trina Solar vs ZNShine solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-znshine"
---

# Trina Solar vs ZNShine

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 212 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Trina Solar | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Changzhou | Suqian |
| Founded | 1997 | 1988 |
| Employees |  | 1,200 |
| Annual capacity |  | 10 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  | NEEQ: 838463 |
| Website | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) | [http://www.znshinesolar.com](http://www.znshinesolar.com) |

ZNShine Solar is a high-tech PV enterprise specializing in R&D, manufacturing, and sales of solar modules. They also provide integrated photovoltaic, battery storage, and green hydrogen solutions, as well as BIPV, rooftop solar, and utility-scale solar solutions with a commitment to boosting green electricity...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Trina Solar | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 340 | 212 | +128 |
| Max Power | 760 W | 670 W | +90 W |
| Avg Power | 520 W | 535 W | +14 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Trina Solar | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 22.83% | +1.97 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.71% | 21.35% | +0.37 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Trina Solar | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.302%/°C | -0.329%/°C | +0.027 |
| Bifacial Share | 145 (43%) | 89 (42%) | +1 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.2 yrs | 28.3 yrs | +0.1 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Trina Solar | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 22 (6.5%) | 5 (2.4%) |
| 20-21% | 57 (16.8%) | 59 (27.8%) |
| 21-22% | 83 (24.4%) | 101 (47.6%) |
| 22-23% | 102 (30.0%) | 47 (22.2%) |
| 23%+ | 76 (22.4%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Trina Solar | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 28 (8.2%) | 6 (2.8%) |
| 400-499W | 142 (41.8%) | 64 (30.2%) |
| 500-599W | 54 (15.9%) | 99 (46.7%) |
| 600-699W | 72 (21.2%) | 43 (20.3%) |
| 700W+ | 44 (12.9%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (63%)


| Technology | Trina Solar | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 248 (72.9%) | 78 (36.8%) |
| PERC | 75 (22.1%) | 134 (63.2%) |
| Unknown | 11 (3.2%) | 0 |
| N-type | 6 (1.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, ZNShine


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ZXM8-TP132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [ZXM8-TP132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [ZXM8-TP132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [ZXM8-TP132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Trina Solar and ZNShine are both Chinese Tier 1 bankable manufacturers, yet they occupy distinct positions in the global solar market. Trina Solar, founded in 1997, has grown into one of the world's top-five module suppliers, supported by a consistent track record as a PVEL Top Performer and wide geographic distribution across European, American, and Asian markets. ZNShine, the older of the two companies (established in 1988) and listed on China's NEEQ exchange, reports a production capacity of 10 GW and a workforce of approximately 1,200 employees. Both manufacturers carry Tier 1 bankability status, qualifying them for mainstream project finance, though Trina Solar's deeper international footprint and broader third-party validation give it the edge in brand recognition among European and North American buyers.

On the technology side, Trina Solar has made a decisive pivot toward N-type TOPCon cells, which now represent nearly 70% of its 305-model portfolio - enabling a peak module efficiency of 24.1% and a maximum power output of 740 Wp. Its average temperature coefficient of -0.304%/°C is meaningfully better than ZNShine's -0.329%/°C, an advantage that compounds over time in warm climates and makes Trina a strong candidate for residential rooftop installations, commercial C&I projects, and large utility-scale ground-mount arrays alike. ZNShine's portfolio remains anchored in PERC technology (roughly 63% of its 212-model range), but the company partially offsets this with a higher average module power of 534.5 Wp and a slightly larger bifacial share of approximately 42%, positioning its lineup well for ground-mounted utility-scale projects using single-axis trackers. ZNShine's graphene-coated glass and double-glass bifacial modules add differentiated durability value for installations in harsh or hard-to-access environments. Average warranty terms are nearly identical at around 28 years for both brands.

For international buyers choosing between the two, Trina Solar is the lower-risk choice when technology leadership, long-term reliability data, and global service coverage are primary criteria - particularly for residential and commercial projects in Europe. ZNShine offers a competitive value proposition for price-sensitive utility-scale procurement where high per-module power output and bifacial yield are the key selection drivers, provided the buyer verifies regional after-sales support and supply chain stability before committing to large volumes.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Trina Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-znshine)
- [Trina Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-znshine)
- [Trina Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-znshine)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-znshine

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.