---
title: "Trina Solar vs Wanze Energy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Trina Solar vs Wanze Energy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-wanze-energy"
---

# Trina Solar vs Wanze Energy

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 1 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Trina Solar | Wanze Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Changzhou | Chengde |
| Founded | 1997 | 2017 |
| Employees |  | 30-50 |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) | [https://www.wanzenyint.com/](https://www.wanzenyint.com/) |

Chengde Wanze Energy Technology Co., Ltd. is a small Chinese manufacturer of solar PV products headquartered in the Hi-tech District of Chengde, Hebei Province. The company specializes in crystalline silicon solar panels as well as innovative solar PV smart utilities including solar tracking 'flower' systems...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Trina Solar | Wanze Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 340 | 1 | +339 |
| Max Power | 760 W | 100 W | +660 W |
| Avg Power | 520 W | 100 W | +420 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Trina Solar | Wanze Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 17.00% | +7.80 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.71% | 17.00% | +4.71 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Trina Solar | Wanze Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.302%/°C | -0.410%/°C | +0.108 |
| Bifacial Share | 145 (43%) | 0 (0%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.2 yrs | 10.0 yrs | +18.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Trina Solar | Wanze Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 22 (6.5%) | 1 (100.0%) |
| 20-21% | 57 (16.8%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 83 (24.4%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 102 (30.0%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 76 (22.4%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Trina Solar | Wanze Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 28 (8.2%) | 1 (100.0%) |
| 400-499W | 142 (41.8%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 54 (15.9%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 72 (21.2%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 44 (12.9%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Trina Solar | Wanze Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 248 (72.9%) | 0 |
| PERC | 75 (22.1%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 11 (3.2%) | 1 (100.0%) |
| N-type | 6 (1.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Wanze Energy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [DLXN-M10-100W](https://comparepv.com/panel/wanze-energy-dlxn-m10-100w) | 100 | 17.0 | -0.410 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Trina Solar is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, founded in 1997. It ranks among the top three module shippers globally, with annual shipments reaching approximately 77 GW in 2024 according to PV Tech, and it maintains a consistent presence on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 solar module list - a designation that signals bankability for project finance purposes. Its energy storage division has also earned six consecutive Tier 1 rankings from BloombergNEF as of Q2 2025. In terms of institutional footprint, Trina Solar's decades of track record, global distribution, and lender familiarity place it in a different league from most competing brands.

The company's product range centers on its Vertex platform, which covers the full spectrum of deployment contexts. The Vertex S+ series, built on N-type TOPCon cell architecture, is aimed at residential rooftops and commercial rooftop systems; pv-magazine confirmed that the latest G3 generation achieves module efficiency up to 24.3% with outputs ranging from 465 W to 495 W. Larger-format Vertex modules designed for utility-scale ground-mount projects can exceed 760 W per panel with efficiencies approaching 24.8%, making them competitive for independent power producer tenders and large C&I solar farms. Both monofacial and bifacial dual-glass variants are available across the lineup.

Wanze Energy operates at a fundamentally different scale and with a different product focus. The company - registered as Chengde Wanze Energy Technology Co., Ltd. and based in Chengde, Hebei Province - was established around 2017 and specializes in niche integrated solar products such as sun-tracking solar flowers, solar carports, solar benches, and all-in-one solar umbrellas combining generation, storage, and EV or device charging. It does not appear on any BloombergNEF Tier 1 list, and independent performance assessments from established sources such as SolarReviews, pv-magazine, or pvtech.org are absent. For any buyer seeking conventional rooftop or utility-scale panels, Trina Solar is the clear default choice, offering documented performance data, widespread installer support, and project-finance-grade bankability. Wanze Energy is worth considering only in specific niche deployments - public spaces, parking shade structures, or decorative urban installations - where its specialty product formats directly match the project brief.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Trina Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Wanze Energy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-wanze-energy)
- [Trina Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Wanze Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-wanze-energy)
- [Trina Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Wanze Energy](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-wanze-energy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-wanze-energy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.