---
title: "Trina Solar vs Waaree - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Trina Solar vs Waaree solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-waaree"
---

# Trina Solar vs Waaree

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 222 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Trina Solar | Waaree |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | India |
| Headquarters | Changzhou | Mumbai |
| Founded | 1997 | 1990 |
| Employees |  | 8500+ |
| Annual capacity |  | 13.3 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  | NSE: WAAREEENER |
| Website | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) | [https://www.waaree.com/](https://www.waaree.com/) |

Waaree Energies Ltd. is a leading global energy transition company committed to delivering innovative, high-quality solar and sustainable energy solutions. Established in 1990 and headquartered in Mumbai, India, the company operates across 20+ countries with an integrated portfolio that spans solar modules, EPC...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Trina Solar | Waaree | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 340 | 222 | +118 |
| Max Power | 760 W | 730 W | +30 W |
| Avg Power | 520 W | 371 W | +149 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Trina Solar | Waaree | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.51% | +1.29 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.71% | 18.39% | +3.32 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Trina Solar | Waaree | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.302%/°C | -0.362%/°C | +0.060 |
| Bifacial Share | 145 (43%) | 85 (38%) | +4 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.2 yrs | 21.7 yrs | +6.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Trina Solar | Waaree |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 22 (6.5%) | 139 (62.6%) |
| 20-21% | 57 (16.8%) | 47 (21.2%) |
| 21-22% | 83 (24.4%) | 14 (6.3%) |
| 22-23% | 102 (30.0%) | 13 (5.9%) |
| 23%+ | 76 (22.4%) | 9 (4.1%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Trina Solar | Waaree |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 28 (8.2%) | 124 (55.9%) |
| 400-499W | 142 (41.8%) | 35 (15.8%) |
| 500-599W | 54 (15.9%) | 36 (16.2%) |
| 600-699W | 72 (21.2%) | 20 (9.0%) |
| 700W+ | 44 (12.9%) | 7 (3.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (48%)


| Technology | Trina Solar | Waaree |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 248 (72.9%) | 12 (5.4%) |
| PERC | 75 (22.1%) | 107 (48.2%) |
| Unknown | 11 (3.2%) | 88 (39.6%) |
| N-type | 6 (1.8%) | 8 (3.6%) |
| HJT | 0 | 7 (3.2%) |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Waaree


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [BiH-11-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [BiH-11-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [BiH-11-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [BiH-11-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [BiH-11-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [BiH-11-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [BiH-11-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Bi-68-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bi-68-665) | 665 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [WSMD-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-wsmd-665) | 665 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [WSMD-660](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-wsmd-660) | 660 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Trina Solar and Waaree are both Tier 1 bankable manufacturers, but they occupy distinctly different positions in the global solar market. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 and headquartered in China, is one of the world's largest and most established module producers, shipping well above 80 GW annually alongside other Chinese giants. Its portfolio spans 305 panel models with an average output of 506 Wp and average module efficiency of 21.5%, driven by a nearly 70% share of TOPCon technology - one of the most advanced cell architectures in mass production today. Waaree, founded in 1990 and based in Mumbai, India, is the largest solar module manufacturer on the Indian subcontinent, listed on the NSE and reporting a production capacity of 13.3 GW. Its 214-model portfolio centers on PERC technology (50% of the range), with an average module power of 362 Wp and average efficiency of 18.2%. Both manufacturers have reached max panel outputs above 700 Wp, though Trina's ceiling of 740 Wp edges out Waaree's 730 Wp, and Trina's maximum efficiency of 24.1% slightly surpasses Waaree's 23.5%.

Trina Solar's technology strengths make it a natural fit for residential rooftop installs where high power density and low degradation matter most - its average temperature coefficient of -0.304%/°C outperforms Waaree's -0.364%/°C, translating to better real-world yield in warm climates. The broad bifacial share (39% of portfolio) and high-wattage TOPCon lineup also position Trina well for utility-scale ground-mount and large commercial C&I projects that prioritize energy yield per square meter and long-term bankability. Waaree's value proposition is increasingly tied to supply chain diversification: as Western markets seek alternatives to Chinese-origin modules for policy, tender, or ESG reasons, Waaree's Indian manufacturing base - including a 2.6 GW facility in the United States - offers a credible non-Chinese option. Its expanding TOPCon line and competitive PERC range serve standard C&I and emerging-market residential segments well.

For international buyers choosing between the two, Trina Solar is the stronger choice where maximum efficiency, technology maturity, and long warranty coverage (averaging 28 years across its portfolio versus 21 years for Waaree) are the primary criteria. Waaree is the more compelling option where procurement rules, government incentives, or strategic sourcing policies favor non-Chinese origin - a growing consideration in Europe, the United States, and markets implementing local content requirements.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Trina Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Waaree](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-waaree)
- [Trina Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Waaree](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-waaree)
- [Trina Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Waaree](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-waaree)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-waaree

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.