---
title: "Trina Solar vs Vikram Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Trina Solar vs Vikram Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-vikram-solar"
---

# Trina Solar vs Vikram Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 202 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Vikram Solar leans bifacial (74% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Trina Solar | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | India |
| Headquarters | Changzhou | Kolkata |
| Founded | 1997 | 2005 |
| Employees |  | 1,895 |
| Annual capacity |  | 9.5 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  | NSE, BSE: VIKRAMSOLR |
| Website | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) | [http://www.vikramsolar.com](http://www.vikramsolar.com) |

Vikram Solar Limited is a leading Indian solar photovoltaic (PV) module manufacturer and solar solutions provider. They offer engineering, procurement, construction (EPC), and operations & maintenance (O&M) services for solar plants. The company manufactures high-efficiency solar PV modules and has a pan-India...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Trina Solar | Vikram Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 340 | 202 | +138 |
| Max Power | 760 W | 735 W | +25 W |
| Avg Power | 520 W | 553 W | +33 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Trina Solar | Vikram Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.69% | +1.11 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.71% | 21.45% | +0.26 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Trina Solar | Vikram Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.302%/°C | -0.334%/°C | +0.032 |
| Bifacial Share | 145 (43%) | 150 (74%) | +32 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.2 yrs | 28.6 yrs | +0.4 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Trina Solar | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 22 (6.5%) | 11 (5.4%) |
| 20-21% | 57 (16.8%) | 42 (20.8%) |
| 21-22% | 83 (24.4%) | 106 (52.5%) |
| 22-23% | 102 (30.0%) | 27 (13.4%) |
| 23%+ | 76 (22.4%) | 16 (7.9%) |


## Power distribution

Vikram Solar offers more 600W+ panels (42% of lineup)


| Power band | Trina Solar | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 28 (8.2%) | 12 (5.9%) |
| 400-499W | 142 (41.8%) | 54 (26.7%) |
| 500-599W | 54 (15.9%) | 52 (25.7%) |
| 600-699W | 72 (21.2%) | 69 (34.2%) |
| 700W+ | 44 (12.9%) | 15 (7.4%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (75%)


| Technology | Trina Solar | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 248 (72.9%) | 8 (4.0%) |
| PERC | 75 (22.1%) | 152 (75.2%) |
| Unknown | 11 (3.2%) | 0 |
| N-type | 6 (1.8%) | 30 (14.9%) |
| HJT | 0 | 12 (5.9%) |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Vikram Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-735-05) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-730-05) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-725-05) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-720-05) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-715-05) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-715-05) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-710-05) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-710-05) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Trina Solar is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Changzhou, founded in 1997, and one of the dominant forces in global solar module supply. BloombergNEF confirmed its Tier 1 bankability status in Q1 2025, and the company has held PVEL Top Performer recognition for eleven consecutive years. In 2024, Trina shipped approximately 77 GW of modules, placing it joint third globally by annual volume, with cumulative deliveries now exceeding 205 GW. Vikram Solar, founded in 2006 and headquartered in Kolkata, India, is a substantially smaller but credible manufacturer that re-entered the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list in 2024 and has also earned PVEL Top Performer status; its annual nameplate manufacturing capacity currently stands at around 4.5 GW. On every measure of institutional footprint - lender recognition, supply scale, and global distribution reach - Trina Solar holds a clear lead.

Trina's product range covers both residential rooftop and utility-scale ground-mount segments. The Vertex S+ line, built on N-type i-TOPCon cells, targets homes and commercial buildings with module efficiencies confirmed up to 24.3%, while the large-format Vertex N series - capable of exceeding 725 W per panel - is engineered for tracker-mounted utility farms. Vikram Solar's flagship high-efficiency line is the Hypersol family, also using N-type TOPCon technology with bifacial half-cut cells; the Hypersol Pro variant launched at the Renewable Energy India Expo 2025 achieves efficiencies up to 23.69%. Vikram has secured a 1 GW module supply agreement for Indian utility projects, demonstrating growing large-project credibility, though its international distribution network remains considerably narrower than Trina's.

For most international buyers outside South Asia, Trina Solar is the lower-risk default choice: broader installer networks, better parts availability, and a longer continuous record of Tier 1 bankability simplify project financing and long-term servicing. Vikram Solar is a genuinely bankable alternative worth evaluating where Indian local-content requirements apply, or when a buyer seeks competitive pricing from a mid-sized manufacturer with strong domestic credentials. The two brands share comparable core TOPCon technology and hold similar quality certifications, but they are not interchangeable in terms of global scale or supply-chain depth.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Trina Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Vikram Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-vikram-solar)
- [Trina Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Vikram Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-vikram-solar)
- [Trina Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Vikram Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-vikram-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-vikram-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.