---
title: "Trina Solar vs Viessmann - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Trina Solar vs Viessmann solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-viessmann"
---

# Trina Solar vs Viessmann

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 11 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Trina Solar | Viessmann |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Germany |
| Headquarters | Changzhou | Allendorf |
| Founded | 1997 | 1917 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) | [https://www.viessmann.com](https://www.viessmann.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Trina Solar | Viessmann | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 340 | 11 | +329 |
| Max Power | 760 W | 405 W | +355 W |
| Avg Power | 520 W | 361 W | +159 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Trina Solar | Viessmann | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 21.30% | +3.50 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.71% | 19.41% | +2.30 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Trina Solar | Viessmann | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.302%/°C | -0.362%/°C | +0.060 |
| Bifacial Share | 145 (43%) | 0 (0%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.2 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +3.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Trina Solar | Viessmann |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 22 (6.5%) | 3 (27.3%) |
| 20-21% | 57 (16.8%) | 6 (54.5%) |
| 21-22% | 83 (24.4%) | 2 (18.2%) |
| 22-23% | 102 (30.0%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 76 (22.4%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Trina Solar | Viessmann |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 28 (8.2%) | 6 (54.5%) |
| 400-499W | 142 (41.8%) | 5 (45.5%) |
| 500-599W | 54 (15.9%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 72 (21.2%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 44 (12.9%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (73%)


| Technology | Trina Solar | Viessmann |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 248 (72.9%) | 0 |
| PERC | 75 (22.1%) | 8 (72.7%) |
| Unknown | 11 (3.2%) | 3 (27.3%) |
| N-type | 6 (1.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Viessmann


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [M405WE](https://comparepv.com/panel/viessmann-m405we) | 405 | 20.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [M405WK](https://comparepv.com/panel/viessmann-m405wk) | 405 | 20.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [M400WG](https://comparepv.com/panel/viessmann-m400wg) | 400 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [M400WE](https://comparepv.com/panel/viessmann-m400we) | 400 | 20.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [M400WK](https://comparepv.com/panel/viessmann-m400wk) | 400 | 20.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [M395WG](https://comparepv.com/panel/viessmann-m395wg) | 395 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [M395WK](https://comparepv.com/panel/viessmann-m395wk) | 395 | 20.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [M390WG](https://comparepv.com/panel/viessmann-m390wg) | 390 | 20.8 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [P265PGHC](https://comparepv.com/panel/viessmann-p265pghc) | 265 | 16.3 | -0.420 | Polycrystalline |
| 10 | [P260PGHC](https://comparepv.com/panel/viessmann-p260pghc) | 260 | 16.0 | -0.420 | Polycrystalline |


## Summary

Trina Solar is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 1997 and headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province. It has been repeatedly recognized as a Tier 1 PV module manufacturer by BloombergNEF, including in Q1 2025, confirming robust bankability and access to project finance on a global scale. In 2024, Trina Solar shipped approximately 77 GW of modules, placing it third in the world by volume and capturing roughly 11% of the global market. Viessmann, by contrast, is a German energy-systems company founded in 1917; its Climate Solutions division - which encompasses the Vitovolt solar panel line - was acquired by Carrier Global and the transaction closed in early 2024. Although Viessmann carries deep heritage in heating technology, its solar module business is not listed separately on the BNEF Tier 1 ranking, positioning it as an integrated home-energy systems provider rather than a standalone bankable module manufacturer. On institutional footprint and market scale, Trina Solar is the clear frontrunner.

Trina Solar's current catalogue is built around N-type TOPCon cell technology. The Vertex S+ family targets residential rooftops and small-to-mid commercial installations, with the latest G3 generation achieving efficiencies of up to 22.8% and a 30-year performance guarantee. Larger-format Vertex N modules serve utility-scale and commercial ground-mount projects, giving Trina Solar a presence across virtually every segment of the market. Viessmann's Vitovolt 300 range uses monocrystalline PERC cells and reaches efficiencies of around 20.7%. The line is designed primarily for European residential rooftops and is most compelling when bundled with Viessmann's own Vitocal heat pump and Vitocharge VX3 lithium iron phosphate battery storage unit, forming a tightly integrated single-brand home energy package.

For most buyers - whether the project is a residential rooftop, a commercial complex, or a utility installation - Trina Solar is the stronger default in 2025, given its confirmed Tier 1 bankability, modern TOPCon technology, and global supply depth. Viessmann's Vitovolt panels make the most sense for homeowners already committed to the Viessmann ecosystem who want a seamless all-in-one heating and solar solution from a single trusted European brand; outside that context, the two manufacturers are not meaningfully interchangeable.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Trina Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Viessmann](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-viessmann)
- [Trina Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Viessmann](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-viessmann)
- [Trina Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Viessmann](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-viessmann)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-viessmann

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.