--- title: "Trina Solar vs Victron Energy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Trina Solar vs Victron Energy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-victron-energy" --- # Trina Solar vs Victron Energy Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 0 models). Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Trina Solar | Victron Energy | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | Netherlands | | Headquarters | Changzhou | Almere-Haven | | Founded | 1997 | 1975 | | Employees | | 51-200 | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | yes | | | Listed | | | | Website | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) | [http://www.victronenergy.com/](http://www.victronenergy.com/) | Victron Energy is a Netherlands-based company specializing in power solutions for off-grid, backup, and mobile applications. They offer a wide range of products including inverters, chargers, batteries, and monitoring systems. Known for reliability, flexibility, and integration, Victron's products are trusted by... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Trina Solar | Victron Energy | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 340 | 0 | +340 | | Max Power | 760 W | 0 W | +760 W | | Avg Power | 520 W | 0 W | +520 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Trina Solar | Victron Energy | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 24.80% | - | | | Avg Efficiency | 21.71% | - | | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Trina Solar | Victron Energy | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.302%/°C | - | | | Bifacial Share | 145 (43%) | 0 (0%) | +43 pp | | Avg Warranty | 28.2 yrs | - | | ## Efficiency distribution Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Trina Solar | Victron Energy | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 22 (6.5%) | 0 | | 20-21% | 57 (16.8%) | 0 | | 21-22% | 83 (24.4%) | 0 | | 22-23% | 102 (30.0%) | 0 | | 23%+ | 76 (22.4%) | 0 | ## Power distribution Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup) | Power band | Trina Solar | Victron Energy | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 28 (8.2%) | 0 | | 400-499W | 142 (41.8%) | 0 | | 500-599W | 54 (15.9%) | 0 | | 600-699W | 72 (21.2%) | 0 | | 700W+ | 44 (12.9%) | 0 | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%) | Technology | Trina Solar | Victron Energy | | --- | --- | --- | | TOPCon | 248 (72.9%) | 0 | | PERC | 75 (22.1%) | 0 | | Unknown | 11 (3.2%) | 0 | | N-type | 6 (1.8%) | 0 | ## Top panels, Trina Solar | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Trina Solar is a Chinese photovoltaic module manufacturer headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, with roots going back to 1997. It ranks among the world's largest solar panel producers: BloombergNEF awarded it a 100% bankability rating in 2025, making it an eighth consecutive appearance on the BNEF Tier 1 list. Annual manufacturing capacity exceeds 80 GW, and cumulative shipments surpassed 292 GW by mid-2025, consistently placing Trina among the global top five module suppliers. Victron Energy, by contrast, is a Dutch company founded in 1975 and headquartered in Almere-Haven, the Netherlands. It is primarily recognized as a manufacturer of power management electronics - inverters, MPPT solar charge controllers, and battery systems - rather than as a solar panel producer. Its BlueSolar panel range is a secondary product line complementing its core equipment business. Victron does not appear on the BNEF Tier 1 PV module manufacturer list, and its panel production volume is not comparable to mainstream module makers. On institutional footprint and bankability, Trina Solar holds a decisively stronger position. Trina Solar's product portfolio spans multiple market segments. The Vertex S+ series, built on n-type i-TOPCon cell technology with dual-glass construction, is the company's current mainstream flagship, reaching efficiencies up to 22.8% and available in configurations suited to both residential rooftops and commercial installations. The third-generation Vertex S+ G3, introduced in early 2026, adds variants targeting enhanced durability and hail resistance. An older PERC-based Vertex S line remains available as a cost-oriented option. For utility-scale ground-mount projects, Trina offers higher-wattage large-format Vertex modules. Victron Energy's BlueSolar panels are small-format monocrystalline modules - compact units designed for marine, RV, camper van, and remote off-grid use. They are not positioned for grid-connected residential or commercial installations and carry a 25-year power output warranty alongside a 5-year materials warranty. For most international buyers evaluating solar panels for a residential, commercial, or utility project, Trina Solar is the relevant choice: it offers a broad, bankable product range backed by confirmed BNEF Tier 1 status and massive supply chain depth. Victron Energy excels as a supplier of balance-of-system components - particularly its MPPT controllers, inverter-chargers, and monitoring platform - making it a natural complement to a panel purchase rather than a direct competitor. Comparing these two brands head-to-head as solar panel manufacturers is largely an apples-to-oranges exercise, given how differently each is positioned in the market. Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Trina Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Victron Energy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-victron-energy) - [Trina Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Victron Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-victron-energy) - [Trina Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Victron Energy](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-victron-energy) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-victron-energy Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.