---
title: "Trina Solar vs TCL Zhonghuan - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Trina Solar vs TCL Zhonghuan solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-tcl-zhonghuan"
---

# Trina Solar vs TCL Zhonghuan

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 66 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. TCL Zhonghuan leans bifacial (65% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Trina Solar | TCL Zhonghuan |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Changzhou | Tianjin |
| Founded | 1997 | 1981 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  | SZSE: 002129 |
| Website | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) | [https://www.tjsemi.com](https://www.tjsemi.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Trina Solar | TCL Zhonghuan | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 340 | 66 | +274 |
| Max Power | 760 W | 725 W | +35 W |
| Avg Power | 520 W | 585 W | +64 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Trina Solar | TCL Zhonghuan | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 24.60% | +0.20 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.71% | 23.13% | +1.42 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Trina Solar | TCL Zhonghuan | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.302%/°C | -0.273%/°C | +0.029 |
| Bifacial Share | 145 (43%) | 43 (65%) | +23 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.2 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +1.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

TCL Zhonghuan skews to higher efficiency: 58% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Trina Solar | TCL Zhonghuan |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 22 (6.5%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 57 (16.8%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 83 (24.4%) | 1 (1.5%) |
| 22-23% | 102 (30.0%) | 27 (40.9%) |
| 23%+ | 76 (22.4%) | 38 (57.6%) |


## Power distribution

TCL Zhonghuan offers more 600W+ panels (55% of lineup)


| Power band | Trina Solar | TCL Zhonghuan |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 28 (8.2%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 142 (41.8%) | 17 (25.8%) |
| 500-599W | 54 (15.9%) | 13 (19.7%) |
| 600-699W | 72 (21.2%) | 24 (36.4%) |
| 700W+ | 44 (12.9%) | 12 (18.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (45%)


| Technology | Trina Solar | TCL Zhonghuan |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 248 (72.9%) | 30 (45.5%) |
| PERC | 75 (22.1%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 11 (3.2%) | 0 |
| N-type | 6 (1.8%) | 6 (9.1%) |
| Back Contact | 0 | 30 (45.5%) |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, TCL Zhonghuan


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HSM-ND66-GK725 (IEC1500V)](https://comparepv.com/panel/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd66-gk725-iec1500v) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HSM-ND66-GK725](https://comparepv.com/panel/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd66-gk725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HSM-ND66-GK720 (IEC1500V)](https://comparepv.com/panel/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd66-gk720-iec1500v) | 720 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HSM-ND66-GK720](https://comparepv.com/panel/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd66-gk720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HSM-ND66-GK715 (IEC1500V)](https://comparepv.com/panel/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd66-gk715-iec1500v) | 715 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HSM-ND66-GK715](https://comparepv.com/panel/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd66-gk715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HSM-ND66-GK710](https://comparepv.com/panel/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd66-gk710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HSM-ND66-GK710 (IEC1500V)](https://comparepv.com/panel/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd66-gk710-iec1500v) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HSM-ND66-GK705](https://comparepv.com/panel/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd66-gk705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HSM-ND66-GK705 (IEC1500V)](https://comparepv.com/panel/tcl-zhonghuan-hsm-nd66-gk705-iec1500v) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

TCL Zhonghuan is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Tianjin and backed by the TCL Group. Its origins lie in silicon wafer production - it grew into one of the world's largest wafer suppliers before expanding into finished modules sold under the Huansheng Solar brand. The company holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and reported approximately 15.1 GW in module shipments for 2025, an increase of over 80% year on year, though its module brand ranked around 15th globally by volume. Trina Solar was founded in 1997 by Gao Jifan in Changzhou, Jiangsu province, and has achieved a 100% bankability rating from BNEF in 2025 - the eighth time it has topped that assessment. Cumulative global shipments surpassed 292 GW by mid-2025, and annual module volume of 60-70 GW places Trina among the top five module makers worldwide. On institutional track record and bankability history, Trina Solar holds a clear advantage.

Both manufacturers have built their current portfolios around n-type TOPCon cell technology. TCL Zhonghuan's T5 Pro series, launched in late 2025, spans residential use at 480 W, commercial and industrial applications at 680 W, and utility-scale ground-mount at 760 W, with module efficiency confirmed at up to 25.17%. The company is simultaneously developing BC and shingling cell routes alongside TOPCon as part of a broader n-type product matrix. Trina Solar's Vertex family is similarly segmented: the Vertex S+ targets residential and smaller commercial rooftops in the 465-495 W range with efficiency confirmed at up to 24.3%, while the Vertex N series addresses large-scale commercial and utility projects at outputs above 700 W. Trina backs its flagship modules with a 30-year performance warranty and has been named a PVEL Top Performer for 11 consecutive years.

For a typical international buyer - whether a residential installer or a project developer seeking bankable equipment - Trina Solar is the lower-risk default, given its longer module track record, higher global shipment volume, and repeatedly verified quality credentials. TCL Zhonghuan is technically competitive and expanding quickly, and its deep wafer and cell expertise translates into genuine product quality, but its shorter history specifically in the module market may require additional due diligence for project financing. Buyers focused on high efficiency and the latest TOPCon variants will find TCL Zhonghuan a credible alternative rather than a clear second choice.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Trina Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs TCL Zhonghuan](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-tcl-zhonghuan)
- [Trina Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs TCL Zhonghuan](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-tcl-zhonghuan)
- [Trina Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs TCL Zhonghuan](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-tcl-zhonghuan)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-tcl-zhonghuan

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.