--- title: "Trina Solar vs Sun Earth - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Trina Solar vs Sun Earth solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-sun-earth" --- # Trina Solar vs Sun Earth Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 60 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Sun Earth leans bifacial (63% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Trina Solar | Sun Earth | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | | | Headquarters | Changzhou | | | Founded | 1997 | | | Employees | | | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | yes | no | | Listed | | | | Website | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) | | ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Trina Solar | Sun Earth | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 340 | 60 | +280 | | Max Power | 760 W | 610 W | +150 W | | Avg Power | 520 W | 510 W | +10 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Trina Solar | Sun Earth | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.80% | +1.00 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 21.71% | 22.42% | +0.70 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Trina Solar | Sun Earth | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.302%/°C | -0.294%/°C | +0.008 | | Bifacial Share | 145 (43%) | 38 (63%) | +21 pp | | Avg Warranty | 28.2 yrs | 30.9 yrs | +2.7 yr | ## Efficiency distribution Sun Earth skews to higher efficiency: 37% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Trina Solar | Sun Earth | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 22 (6.5%) | 2 (3.3%) | | 20-21% | 57 (16.8%) | 2 (3.3%) | | 21-22% | 83 (24.4%) | 14 (23.3%) | | 22-23% | 102 (30.0%) | 20 (33.3%) | | 23%+ | 76 (22.4%) | 22 (36.7%) | ## Power distribution Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup) | Power band | Trina Solar | Sun Earth | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 28 (8.2%) | 2 (3.3%) | | 400-499W | 142 (41.8%) | 24 (40.0%) | | 500-599W | 54 (15.9%) | 30 (50.0%) | | 600-699W | 72 (21.2%) | 4 (6.7%) | | 700W+ | 44 (12.9%) | 0 | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%) Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (82%) | Technology | Trina Solar | Sun Earth | | --- | --- | --- | | TOPCon | 248 (72.9%) | 49 (81.7%) | | PERC | 75 (22.1%) | 4 (6.7%) | | Unknown | 11 (3.2%) | 6 (10.0%) | | N-type | 6 (1.8%) | 0 | | BIPV | 0 | 1 (1.7%) | ## Top panels, Trina Solar | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Sun Earth | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [DXM8-72HBG 610W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-610w) | 610 | 23.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [DXM8-72H-610](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72h-610) | 610 | 23.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [DXM8-72HBG 600W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-600w) | 600 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [DXM8-72H-600](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72h-600) | 600 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [DXM8-72HBG 590W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-590w) | 590 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [DXM8-72H-590](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72h-590) | 590 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [SKT580M10-144D4](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-skt580m10-144d4) | 580 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [DXM8-72HBG 580W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-580w) | 580 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [DXM8-72H-580](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72h-580) | 580 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [SKT575M10-144D4](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-skt575m10-144d4) | 575 | 22.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Sun Earth is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Ningbo, with origins dating to 1978, making it one of the longest-standing names in photovoltaic production. The company runs a vertically integrated factory - covering silicon processing through panel assembly - and historically served telecom tower infrastructure and off-grid portable systems alongside residential rooftop applications. Despite this pedigree, Sun Earth is classified as a Tier 2 supplier and does not appear on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list, meaning commercial project lenders have not widely treated its modules as bankable collateral for non-recourse financing. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 and headquartered in Changzhou, occupies a markedly stronger institutional position: a perennial BloombergNEF Tier 1 manufacturer, it ranks among the five largest module suppliers globally and surpassed 260 GW in cumulative shipments by end-2024. On institutional footprint and bankability, Trina Solar is the decisively stronger of the two. Sun Earth's catalog has centered on monocrystalline and polycrystalline modules priced as affordable alternatives to first-tier brands, appealing to cost-sensitive buyers in residential and off-grid segments. Trina Solar has shifted its mainstream lineup to N-type TOPCon cell technology across a structured product family. The Vertex S+ series addresses residential rooftops and small commercial installations, while the large-format Vertex N line - including a 760 W module with efficiency confirmed above 24.5% by pv-magazine - is engineered for utility-scale ground-mount and C&I projects. Trina Storage, the company's battery division, separately holds a consecutive BloombergNEF Tier 1 ranking in energy storage, enabling turnkey solar-plus-storage solutions. For most buyers - individual homeowners, commercial developers, or independent power producers - Trina Solar is the more defensible default. Its Tier 1 bankability, confirmed global shipment scale, and well-documented TOPCon portfolio reduce project finance risk and long-term warranty exposure. Sun Earth can still suit cost-sensitive off-grid or smaller residential projects where institutional bankability is not a constraint. At the commercial or utility scale, however, the two brands are not interchangeable, and Tier 2 status is a meaningful differentiator for any buyer working with project finance lenders. Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Trina Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Sun Earth](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-sun-earth) - [Trina Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Sun Earth](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-sun-earth) - [Trina Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Sun Earth](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-sun-earth) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-sun-earth Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.