---
title: "Trina Solar vs AKCOME - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Trina Solar vs AKCOME solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-akcome"
---

# Trina Solar vs AKCOME

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 3 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Trina Solar | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Changzhou | Suzhou |
| Founded | 1997 | 2003 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Trina Solar | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 340 | 3 | +337 |
| Max Power | 760 W | 700 W | +60 W |
| Avg Power | 520 W | 672 W | +152 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Trina Solar | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 22.54% | +2.26 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.71% | 21.63% | +0.09 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Trina Solar | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.302%/°C | -0.240%/°C | +0.062 |
| Bifacial Share | 145 (43%) | 3 (100%) | +57 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.2 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +1.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Trina Solar | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 22 (6.5%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 57 (16.8%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 83 (24.4%) | 2 (66.7%) |
| 22-23% | 102 (30.0%) | 1 (33.3%) |
| 23%+ | 76 (22.4%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | Trina Solar | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 28 (8.2%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 142 (41.8%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 54 (15.9%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 72 (21.2%) | 2 (66.7%) |
| 700W+ | 44 (12.9%) | 1 (33.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)


| Technology | Trina Solar | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 248 (72.9%) | 0 |
| PERC | 75 (22.1%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 11 (3.2%) | 0 |
| N-type | 6 (1.8%) | 0 |
| HJT | 0 | 3 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AKCOME is a Chinese photovoltaic manufacturer based in Jiangsu Province that built its identity around heterojunction (HJT) cell technology and reached a peak module production capacity of approximately 3.8 GW per year. For a period the company featured on BloombergNEF Tier 1 lists, signaling basic bankability, but its financial position deteriorated sharply in 2024. A key subsidiary entered court-supervised bankruptcy reorganization in July 2024, the Shenzhen Stock Exchange delisted AKCOME shares in August 2024 after they fell below one yuan for 20 consecutive trading days, and PV ModuleTech downgraded the company to a CC+ bankability rating - the agency's low-investment-reliability tier. By January 2025, AKCOME had been removed from the TaiyangNews TOP SOLAR MODULES ranking because its website had become inaccessible. Trina Solar, headquartered in Changzhou, China, and founded in 1997, is one of the most established names in the global PV industry. It maintains a consistent BloombergNEF Tier 1 rating and is grouped alongside LONGi, Jinko Solar, and JA Solar as a top-tier manufacturer, with a stated production capacity exceeding 100 GW. On every institutional measure, Trina Solar carries a significantly stronger and more stable market footprint.

In terms of technology and product families, AKCOME had focused primarily on HJT modules - a cell architecture prized for high efficiency and low temperature coefficients - but the company's effective withdrawal from active business since late 2024 makes warranty fulfillment and after-sales support highly uncertain for any buyer considering existing AKCOME inventory. Trina Solar, by contrast, maintains a well-supported and actively expanding portfolio built on n-type TOPCon technology. Its Vertex S+ series targets residential rooftops and light commercial applications, offering dual-glass bifacial modules with output around 445 W and efficiencies above 22%. The Vertex N series addresses commercial, industrial, and utility-scale ground-mount projects, with output reaching beyond 740 W and module efficiencies confirmed above 23%. Trina has also achieved a world-record TOPCon cell efficiency of 26.58% in laboratory conditions, and its 2,000-V utility modules were the first of their size class to receive UL 61730 certification.

For most international buyers - whether procuring panels for a residential rooftop, a commercial C&I portfolio, or a large-scale ground-mount project - Trina Solar is the clear default recommendation. Financial stability, active global distribution, credible 25-year product and 30-year linear power warranties, and continuous product innovation all point decisively in Trina's favor. Purchasing modules from a manufacturer currently in insolvency proceedings, as AKCOME is, introduces serious risk of unenforceable warranties and no post-sale support over a 25-30 year asset life - a risk that no efficiency advantage could reasonably offset.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Trina Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-akcome)
- [Trina Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-akcome)
- [Trina Solar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-akcome)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/trina-solar-vs-akcome

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.