---
title: "Topsky Energy vs AIKO - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Topsky Energy vs AIKO solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/topsky-energy-vs-aiko"
---

# Topsky Energy vs AIKO

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 0 models). AIKO leans bifacial (24% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Topsky Energy | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shenzhen | Shanghai |
| Founded | 1998 | 2009 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity | \<1 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | SZSE: 600732 |
| Website | [https://www.topskyenergy.com](https://www.topskyenergy.com) | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) |

Shenzhen Topsky Energy Co., Ltd. is a Chinese manufacturer of solar cells and photovoltaic modules, including lightweight and customized panels. The company operates production facilities in Zhejiang and Jiangsu provinces, with sales and marketing based in Shenzhen and Hong Kong. Its products are distributed to over...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Topsky Energy | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 144 | +144 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 805 W | +805 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 581 W | +581 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Topsky Energy | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 25.20% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 23.65% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Topsky Energy | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.271%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 35 (24%) | +24 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 29.5 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Topsky Energy | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 3 (2.1%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 3 (2.1%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 3 (2.1%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 12 (8.3%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 123 (85.4%) |


## Power distribution

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)


| Power band | Topsky Energy | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 2 (1.4%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 50 (34.7%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 5 (3.5%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 78 (54.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 9 (6.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)


| Technology | Topsky Energy | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Back Contact | 0 | 119 (82.6%) |
| N-type | 0 | 17 (11.8%) |
| PERC | 0 | 7 (4.9%) |
| Flexible | 0 | 1 (0.7%) |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Topsky Energy is a Chinese solar manufacturer headquartered in Shenzhen, Guangdong, founded in 1998. The company exports modules globally to markets including North America, Europe, Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and Africa, and its products carry TUV Rhineland and CE certifications. No confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability listing or independently verified annual production figures emerged from available public sources, which places Topsky in the broader category of smaller or niche-oriented export manufacturers. AIKO Solar, also China-headquartered, arrived later but has scaled rapidly: it holds confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 status, has reported approximately 20 GW of production capacity as of early 2025, and has committed substantial capital - roughly RMB 1.665 billion - to converting existing lines to its proprietary ABC cell technology. On institutional footprint and verified bankability, AIKO holds a clearly stronger position.

On the product side, Topsky offers a broad but conventional lineup spanning mono PERC, TOPCon, and HJT module formats, with configurations suited to ground-mount utility projects, flat-roof commercial systems, and distributed rooftop applications. The range appears oriented toward cost-competitive and OEM-export buyers rather than premium end markets. AIKO has built its entire product identity around its All Back Contact (ABC) n-type cell platform, which moves all electrical contacts to the rear of the cell to eliminate front-shading losses. Its Neostar series targets premium residential rooftops, the Comet series addresses commercial and industrial applications with higher-wattage formats, and the Stellar series is aimed at utility-scale ground mounts. Independent installer surveys - including a first-place finish in the 2025 SolarQuotes Installers Choice Awards - support AIKO's performance claims in real-world conditions.

For a typical buyer in 2025 prioritizing long-term bankability, independently verified efficiency leadership, and strong installer support, AIKO is the clearer recommendation. Topsky may suit buyers seeking a flexible, lower-cost supplier for price-sensitive projects, but the absence of a confirmed Tier 1 rating introduces financing and resale-value risk that AIKO does not carry.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html \| Aiko Solar review - SolarQuotes Installers Choice 2025 \| review

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/aiko-capacity-upgrades-abc-cell-technology/ \| Aiko steps up ABC transition with 11GW capacity upgrade \| article

\- https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/topsky-energy \| Topsky Energy buyer profile - EnergyPal 2025 \| review

\- https://www.pscenergy.com.au/blog/aiko-solar-panels-pros-and-cons/ \| AIKO Solar Panels pros and cons - PSC Energy \| review

Sources:

\- \[Aiko Solar \| Solar Panels Review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html)

\- \[Aiko steps up ABC transition with 11GW capacity upgrade - PV Tech\](https://www.pv-tech.org/aiko-capacity-upgrades-abc-cell-technology/)

\- \[Topsky Energy - EnergyPal Buyer's Guide\](https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/topsky-energy)

\- \[AIKO Solar Panels Pros and Cons - PSC Energy\](https://www.pscenergy.com.au/blog/aiko-solar-panels-pros-and-cons/)

\- \[AIKO Achieves Prestigious Tier 1 Status by BloombergNEF\](https://aikosolar.com/en/aiko-achieves-prestigious-tier1-status/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Topsky Energy vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/topsky-energy-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko)
- [Topsky Energy vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/topsky-energy-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aiko)
- [Topsky Energy vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/topsky-energy-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aiko)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/topsky-energy-vs-aiko