--- title: "Topsky Energy vs AEET - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Topsky Energy vs AEET solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/topsky-energy-vs-aeet" --- # Topsky Energy vs AEET AEET has the broader catalog (5 vs 0 models). ## The two companies | Attribute | Topsky Energy | AEET | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | | | Headquarters | Shenzhen | | | Founded | 1998 | | | Employees | | | | Annual capacity | \<1 GW/year | | | Tier 1 | no | no | | Listed | | | | Website | [https://www.topskyenergy.com](https://www.topskyenergy.com) | | Shenzhen Topsky Energy Co., Ltd. is a Chinese manufacturer of solar cells and photovoltaic modules, including lightweight and customized panels. The company operates production facilities in Zhejiang and Jiangsu provinces, with sales and marketing based in Shenzhen and Hong Kong. Its products are distributed to over... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Topsky Energy | AEET | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 0 | 5 | +5 | | Max Power | 0 W | 200 W | +200 W | | Avg Power | 0 W | 190 W | +190 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Topsky Energy | AEET | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | - | 15.70% | | | Avg Efficiency | - | 14.90% | | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Topsky Energy | AEET | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | - | - | | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | | | Avg Warranty | - | 25.0 yrs | | ## Efficiency distribution | Efficiency band | Topsky Energy | AEET | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 0 | 5 (100.0%) | ## Power distribution | Power band | Topsky Energy | AEET | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 0 | 5 (100.0%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%) | Technology | Topsky Energy | AEET | | --- | --- | --- | | PERC | 0 | 5 (100.0%) | ## Top panels, AEET | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline | ## Summary AEET Energy Group GmbH is a German solar photovoltaic wholesale and integration company headquartered in Bad Gandersheim, Germany, with activity spanning the early years of European renewable energy adoption. Rather than manufacturing panels itself, AEET operates as a full-service partner - sourcing modules from leading global producers, advising clients, designing and installing systems, and providing ongoing maintenance through a network of more than 500 certified specialist partners across Germany. It holds TÜV Rheinland certification and serves residential, commercial, and solar-park customers. Topsky Energy, formally Shenzhen Topsky Energy Co., Ltd., is a Chinese panel manufacturer founded in 1998 and headquartered in Shenzhen, Guangdong. The company produces solar cells and modules at factories in Guangdong and Jiangsu provinces, with a reported annual capacity of around 500 MW for panels and 200 MW for cells, exporting to more than 150 countries. Neither company appears on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 module manufacturer list - though that classification applies to module producers and is not directly applicable to AEET's distribution model. In terms of raw production footprint, Topsky carries the clearer manufacturing presence. Topsky's catalog covers PERC and TOPCon N-type monocrystalline modules ranging from roughly 300 W up to 670 W, with ENFSolar data listing higher-end TOPCon panels at approximately $0.09 per watt - competitive pricing for commercial and utility procurement. The company holds TUV Rhineland and CE certifications. AEET, as a distributor, does not maintain its own cell technology roadmap; instead it curates products from partner manufacturers and positions itself toward the German residential and small-commercial rooftop segment, where local service expertise and end-to-end system warranty continuity matter more than module specification alone. Comparing these two as like-for-like solar-panel manufacturers is not accurate, since they occupy different roles in the supply chain. A European installer prioritizing after-sales service and integrated project support in Germany would benefit from AEET's full-service model. A procurement team sourcing factory-direct modules for a cost-sensitive commercial project would evaluate Topsky on price-per-watt and certification grounds. Neither brand currently commands the global bankability profile of the leading Tier 1 names, so either path warrants careful due diligence on warranty enforcement and long-term financial stability. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH - ENF Solar manufacturer directory profile \| review \- https://www.enfsolar.com/topsky-energy \| Topsky Energy Co., Ltd - ENF Solar manufacturer directory profile \| review \- https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/aeet-energy-group \| AEET Energy Group - EnergyPal Buyer's Guide 2025 \| review \- https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/topsky-energy \| Topsky Energy - EnergyPal Buyer's Guide 2025 \| review Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Topsky Energy vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/topsky-energy-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aeet) - [Topsky Energy vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/topsky-energy-vs-aiko) - [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet) - [Topsky Energy vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/topsky-energy-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aeet) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/topsky-energy-vs-aeet