---
title: "Tesla vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Tesla vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/tesla-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Tesla vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 0 models). Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Tesla | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | USA | China |
| Headquarters | Austin | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2003 | 1997 |
| Employees | 100000+ |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed | NASDAQ: TSLA |  |
| Website | [https://www.tesla.com](https://www.tesla.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Tesla, Inc. is an American multinational automotive and clean energy company headquartered in Austin, Texas. The company designs, manufactures, and sells electric vehicles, battery energy storage devices, solar panels and solar roof tiles, and related products and services. Tesla is working towards end-to-end solar...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Tesla | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 340 | +340 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 760 W | +760 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 520 W | +520 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Tesla | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.71% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Tesla | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.302%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.2 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Tesla | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Tesla | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Tesla | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Tesla is a US-based company headquartered in Austin, Texas, widely recognized for electric vehicles and the Powerwall home battery, which entered the residential solar market in 2016 through its acquisition of SolarCity. For most of its solar history Tesla acted as an installer rather than a manufacturer, sourcing panels from third-party suppliers including Hanwha Q CELLS. In early 2026 it launched its first domestically manufactured panels at its Gigafactory in Buffalo, New York, and broke ground on a larger facility in Brookshire, Texas, with Elon Musk announcing an ambition to reach 100 GW of annual US manufacturing capacity by 2028. Tesla does not currently appear on BloombergNEF Tier 1 PV module manufacturer lists in the conventional sense. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 and headquartered in Changzhou, China, is one of the world's largest dedicated module manufacturers, with annual production exceeding 80 GW and a 100% bankability rating in BloombergNEF's 2025 PV Module Bankability assessment. On institutional credibility and global footprint, Trina Solar is the clear frontrunner.

Tesla's solar offering is tightly focused on the US residential segment, where its value proposition centers on ecosystem integration - panels paired with Powerwall storage and EV charging managed through a single app. Its modules carry efficiency ratings in the 19-21% range, a 25-year product and performance warranty, and a low-profile all-black aesthetic. The underlying cell technology is not publicly disclosed in detail, and the product is generally positioned as competitively priced mid-range hardware. Trina Solar serves residential, commercial and industrial, and utility-scale ground-mount markets across every major geography. Its Vertex S+ series, confirmed by pv-magazine to have reached 24.3% efficiency in the latest generation using N-type TOPCon cells, targets the premium-efficiency segment, while broader Vertex lines address cost-sensitive large-scale procurement. The company has been named a PVEL Top Performer for eleven consecutive years, and flagship modules carry a 30-year performance warranty.

For international buyers outside the United States, Tesla Solar is not a realistic option - the company does not operate installations or distribution networks beyond the US market. Trina Solar is the default recommendation for any project requiring a bankable, globally available, and field-proven module supplier, whether the application is a suburban rooftop or a multi-megawatt utility farm.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Tesla vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/tesla-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Tesla vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/tesla-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Tesla vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/tesla-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/tesla-vs-trina-solar