--- title: "Tangra vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Tangra vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/tangra-vs-trina-solar" --- # Tangra vs Trina Solar Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 0 models). Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Tangra | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | China | | Headquarters | Wuxi | Changzhou | | Founded | 2016 | 1997 | | Employees | 500-1000 | | | Annual capacity | 5-10 GW/year | | | Tier 1 | yes | yes | | Listed | | | | Website | [https://www.thornova-solar.com](https://www.thornova-solar.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) | Tangra is the flagship solar module product line of Sunova Solar Technology Co., Ltd. (rebranded as Thornova Solar), a Chinese photovoltaic manufacturer founded in 2016 and headquartered in Wuxi, Jiangsu Province. The company specializes in high-efficiency N-type TOPCon bifacial modules under the Tangra series (S, M... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Tangra | Trina Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 0 | 340 | +340 | | Max Power | 0 W | 760 W | +760 W | | Avg Power | 0 W | 520 W | +520 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Tangra | Trina Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% | | | Avg Efficiency | - | 21.71% | | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Tangra | Trina Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.302%/°C | | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp | | Avg Warranty | - | 28.2 yrs | | ## Efficiency distribution Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Tangra | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) | | 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) | | 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) | | 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) | | 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) | ## Power distribution Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup) | Power band | Tangra | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) | | 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) | | 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) | | 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) | | 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%) | Technology | Tangra | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) | | PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) | | Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) | | N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) | ## Top panels, Trina Solar | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Tangra is the flagship module brand of Thornova Solar Technology Co., Ltd., a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2016 with production facilities in China and Indonesia. Thornova Solar has earned BNEF Tier 1 status and holds a B-rating in the PV Tech ModuleTech Bankability Report, establishing credible financial standing for a relatively young company. By the end of 2024, Thornova had delivered a cumulative 7.1 GW of modules globally, with declared production capacity of 6.5 GW for modules and 11.5 GW for solar cells. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 and headquartered in Changzhou, China, is one of the world's most established solar manufacturers, consistently ranked BNEF Tier 1 and delivering approximately 77 GW of modules in 2024 alone - placing it third globally - with cumulative shipments exceeding 205 GW across more than 100 countries. On every measure of institutional scale and market reach, Trina Solar carries a decisively stronger footprint. The Tangra product range centers on N-type bifacial modules, most notably the Tangra M Pro at 580 Wp, which earned Top Performer recognition in five categories of the Kiwa PVEL Scorecard 2025, demonstrating strong real-world reliability and low degradation under field conditions. The line is well suited to residential rooftop and commercial installations where bankable quality at a competitive price point is the priority. Trina Solar's portfolio spans all market segments: the Vertex S+ series, based on N-type i-TOPCon cell technology, reaches efficiency of up to 22.8% and power outputs up to 505 Wp with a 30-year linear performance warranty, while the Vertex N series targets utility-scale ground-mount projects. Trina's combination of product breadth and proven long-term degradation data makes it a natural fit for large C&I and infrastructure-scale procurement. For most international buyers, Trina Solar is the lower-risk default: its track record, global after-sales network, and deep liquidity on secondary markets provide reassurance that is difficult to match at Thornova Solar's current scale. That said, Tangra modules are not a compromise choice - PVEL Top Performer results and BNEF Tier 1 recognition make them a legitimate option when price is a meaningful differentiator. In residential and smaller commercial contexts, the two brands are increasingly comparable, and a buyer who secures a cost advantage with Tangra should not consider it a concession on quality. Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Tangra vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/tangra-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar) - [Tangra vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/tangra-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar) - [Tangra vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/tangra-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/tangra-vs-trina-solar