---
title: "Sunova vs AIKO - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Sunova vs AIKO solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/sunova-vs-aiko"
---

# Sunova vs AIKO

Sunova has the broader catalog (183 vs 144 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Sunova leans bifacial (92% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Sunova | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Hefei | Shanghai |
| Founded | 2008 | 2009 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | SZSE: 600732 |
| Website | [https://www.sunovasolar.com](https://www.sunovasolar.com) | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Sunova | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 183 | 144 | +39 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 805 W | +85 W |
| Avg Power | 523 W | 581 W | +58 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Sunova | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.20% | 25.20% | +2.00 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.60% | 23.65% | +2.05 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Sunova | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.317%/°C | -0.271%/°C | +0.046 |
| Bifacial Share | 168 (92%) | 35 (24%) | +67 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.4 yrs | 29.5 yrs | +1.1 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Sunova | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 46 (25.1%) | 3 (2.1%) |
| 21-22% | 70 (38.3%) | 3 (2.1%) |
| 22-23% | 57 (31.1%) | 12 (8.3%) |
| 23%+ | 10 (5.5%) | 123 (85.4%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 3 (2.1%) |


## Power distribution

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)


| Power band | Sunova | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 84 (45.9%) | 50 (34.7%) |
| 500-599W | 58 (31.7%) | 5 (3.5%) |
| 600-699W | 31 (16.9%) | 78 (54.2%) |
| 700W+ | 10 (5.5%) | 9 (6.2%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 2 (1.4%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (49%)

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)


| Technology | Sunova | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 89 (48.6%) | 7 (4.9%) |
| N-type | 72 (39.3%) | 17 (11.8%) |
| TOPCon | 12 (6.6%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 10 (5.5%) | 0 |
| Back Contact | 0 | 119 (82.6%) |
| Flexible | 0 | 1 (0.7%) |


## Top panels, Sunova


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TS-BGT66(720)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-720-g12) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TS-BWT66(720)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-720-g12) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TS-BGT66(715)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-715-g12) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TS-BWT66(715)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-715-g12) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TS-BGT66(710)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-710-g12) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TS-BWT66(710)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-710-g12) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TS-BGT66(705)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-705-g12) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TS-BWT66(705)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-705-g12) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TS-BGT66(700)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-700-g12) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TS-BWT66(700)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-700-g12) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AIKO is a Chinese solar manufacturer founded in 2009 and headquartered in Shanghai. The company achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status in Q3 2024, confirming its modules have been deployed in bank-financed projects across multiple markets. AIKO has reported a manufacturing capacity of approximately 20 GW per year, placing it firmly in the upper tier of Chinese producers by scale. Sunova Solar was founded in 2016 and is based in Wuxi, Jiangsu, China. Sunova also holds Tier 1 bankability recognition from BloombergNEF and has shipped more than 10 GW of modules cumulatively through 2024, with an operational production capacity of around 2 GW. Between the two, AIKO carries a considerably stronger institutional footprint, particularly in premium residential and commercial markets where efficiency commands a price.

AIKO's entire product lineup is built around its proprietary ABC (All-Back-Contact) cell architecture, which relocates all electrical contacts to the rear of the cell and eliminates front-side shading losses entirely. This sets AIKO apart from peers using TOPCon or HJT and has allowed it to lead global module efficiency rankings - its Neostar 3P54 reaches 25.0% efficiency, and mass-produced module efficiency hit 24.8% in late 2025. A temperature coefficient of -0.26%/°C reduces output losses on hot days compared to standard TOPCon alternatives, and a 30-year product warranty underlines the long-term value pitch. The trade-off is a price premium of roughly 20-30% over mainstream Chinese competitors, which buyers on space-constrained rooftops can partially offset by needing fewer panels. Sunova's offer centers on its Tangra series, using N-type TOPCon cells across residential, commercial and industrial, and utility-scale ground-mount applications. The Tangra L HD module reaches up to 615 W at 22.8% efficiency for large projects, while the mid-range Tangra M Pro targets C&I deployments. Sunova backs its modules with a 30-year performance warranty and a 15-year product warranty.

For buyers prioritizing maximum energy yield per square meter - particularly on constrained residential rooftops or architecturally sensitive buildings - AIKO is the stronger choice, provided the cost premium is acceptable. For projects with more available surface area and tighter budgets, Sunova delivers bankable N-type TOPCon technology at more competitive pricing and is a credible option for standard commercial or utility-scale work where cost-per-watt matters more than peak efficiency. The two brands are not interchangeable at the premium end of the market, but for large ground-mount or bulk procurement scenarios, Sunova stands as a viable and financeable alternative.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Sunova vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/sunova-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko)
- [Sunova vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/sunova-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aiko)
- [Sunova vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/sunova-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aiko)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/sunova-vs-aiko

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.