---
title: "SunLink vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare SunLink vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/sunlink-vs-trina-solar"
---

# SunLink vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 67 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | SunLink | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Changzhou |
| Founded |  | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website |  | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | SunLink | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 67 | 340 | +273 |
| Max Power | 700 W | 760 W | +60 W |
| Avg Power | 398 W | 520 W | +122 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | SunLink | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.80% | 24.80% | +2.00 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 19.94% | 21.71% | +1.78 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | SunLink | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.340%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.038 |
| Bifacial Share | 18 (27%) | 145 (43%) | +16 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 26.8 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.4 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | SunLink | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 35 (52.2%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 9 (13.4%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 10 (14.9%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 13 (19.4%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | SunLink | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 36 (53.7%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 23 (34.3%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 4 (6.0%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 3 (4.5%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 1 (1.5%) | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (63%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | SunLink | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 42 (62.7%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| TOPCon | 18 (26.9%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| Unknown | 5 (7.5%) | 11 (3.2%) |
| HJT | 2 (3.0%) | 0 |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, SunLink


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SL6N132D-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlink-sl6n132d-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SL6N132D-695W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlink-sl6n132d-695w) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SL5N144D-610W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlink-sl5n144d-610w) | 610 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SL5N144D-605W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlink-sl5n144d-605w) | 605 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SL5M144-550](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlink-sl5m144-550) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SL5M144-545](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlink-sl5m144-545) | 545 | 21.1 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SL5M144-540](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlink-sl5m144-540) | 540 | 20.9 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SL5M144-535](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlink-sl5m144-535) | 535 | 20.7 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SL5N108D-455W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlink-sl5n108d-455w) | 455 | 22.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SL5N108D-450W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlink-sl5n108d-450w) | 450 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

SunLink PV is a Chinese solar module manufacturer founded in 2004 and headquartered in Zhangjiagang, Jiangsu Province. The company earned a place on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 list in Q1 2025, confirming a baseline level of bankability for project finance. Its annual revenues remain modest relative to China's largest producers, and the brand is best described as a mid-tier specialist rather than a global volume leader. Trina Solar, by contrast, was founded in 1997 in Changzhou, Jiangsu, and has grown into one of the world's largest solar manufacturers, shipping approximately 77 GW of modules in 2024 - placing it tied for third globally alongside JA Solar. Trina Solar also holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status and maintained module production capacity approaching 95 GW annually as of late 2023, with further expansions planned. On sheer institutional footprint and global market recognition, Trina Solar holds a clear advantage.

SunLink PV's current product portfolio centres on N-type TOPCon technology, with modules reaching conversion efficiencies of up to 22.45%, complementing an earlier PERC range. The lineup is well suited to residential rooftop and small commercial installations where mid-size panel formats are the norm. Trina Solar's Vertex product family spans a far wider range of applications: the Vertex S+ G3 series targets residential and light commercial rooftop work with full-black and hail-resistant variants, while the Vertex N range extends into large commercial and utility-scale ground-mount projects with modules outputting up to 760 W at 24.5% efficiency, as confirmed by PV Magazine in late 2024.

For most international buyers - whether fitting a residential rooftop, a commercial building, or a utility-scale farm - Trina Solar is the stronger default choice, given its deeper distribution networks, broader product variety, and well-documented track record in project financing. SunLink PV is a legitimate Tier 1 option and may appeal to procurement teams seeking alternatives to the dominant Chinese brands, but it cannot match Trina Solar's scale, product depth, or global service infrastructure at this stage.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [SunLink vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/sunlink-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [SunLink vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/sunlink-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [SunLink vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/sunlink-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/sunlink-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.