---
title: "Sunlike Solar vs ZNShine - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Sunlike Solar vs ZNShine solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/sunlike-solar-vs-znshine"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/sunlike-solar/znshine.png"
---

# Sunlike Solar vs ZNShine

ZNShine has the broader catalog (212 vs 135 models). Sunlike Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.52%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Sunlike Solar | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Wuxi, Jiangsu | Suqian |
| Founded | 2010 | 1988 |
| Employees | 300 | 1,200 |
| Annual capacity | 2 GW/year | 10 GW/year |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  | NEEQ: 838463 |
| Website | [http://www.sunlikesolar.com](http://www.sunlikesolar.com) | [http://www.znshinesolar.com](http://www.znshinesolar.com) |

Sunlike Solar Co., Ltd. is a high-tech enterprise specializing in researching, developing, designing, and producing new energy and renewable energy products. They offer various high-efficiency monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar cells and solar modules ranging from 200W to 750W. Their production capacity has...

ZNShine Solar is a high-tech PV enterprise specializing in R&D, manufacturing, and sales of solar modules. They also provide integrated photovoltaic, battery storage, and green hydrogen solutions, as well as BIPV, rooftop solar, and utility-scale solar solutions with a commitment to boosting green electricity...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Sunlike Solar | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 135 | 212 | +77 |
| Max Power | 675 W | 670 W | +5 W |
| Avg Power | 493 W | 535 W | +42 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Sunlike Solar | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.52% | 22.83% | +0.69 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.19% | 21.35% | +0.15 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Sunlike Solar | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.328%/°C | -0.329%/°C | +0.001 |
| Bifacial Share | 57 (42%) | 89 (42%) | +0 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.2 yrs | 28.3 yrs | +1.1 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Sunlike Solar skews to higher efficiency: 5% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Sunlike Solar | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 16 (11.9%) | 5 (2.4%) |
| 20-21% | 41 (30.4%) | 59 (27.8%) |
| 21-22% | 36 (26.7%) | 101 (47.6%) |
| 22-23% | 35 (25.9%) | 47 (22.2%) |
| 23%+ | 7 (5.2%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

ZNShine offers more 600W+ panels (20% of lineup)


| Power band | Sunlike Solar | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 16 (11.9%) | 6 (2.8%) |
| 400-499W | 67 (49.6%) | 64 (30.2%) |
| 500-599W | 26 (19.3%) | 99 (46.7%) |
| 600-699W | 26 (19.3%) | 43 (20.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: PERC (38%)

Dominant cell tech: PERC (63%)


| Technology | Sunlike Solar | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 51 (37.8%) | 134 (63.2%) |
| Unknown | 30 (22.2%) | 0 |
| N-type | 27 (20.0%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 18 (13.3%) | 78 (36.8%) |
| HJT | 5 (3.7%) | 0 |
| Back Contact | 4 (3.0%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Sunlike Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [LNET-675M](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-675m) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [LNET-670M](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-670m) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [LNET-670MD](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-670md) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [LNET-665M](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-665m) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [LNET-665MD](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-665md) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [LNET-660M](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-660m) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [LNET-660MD](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-660md) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [LNET-655M](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-655m) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [LNET-655MD](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-655md) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [LNET-650MD](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunlike-solar-lnet-650md) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, ZNShine


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ZXM8-TP132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [ZXM8-TP132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [ZXM8-TP132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [ZXM8-TP132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Sunlike Solar is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2010 and headquartered in Wuxi, Jiangsu Province. Structured as a private high-tech enterprise, the company produces both P-type and N-type solar cells and modules spanning a power range from roughly 200 W to 750 W, targeting the cost-competitive segment of the global market. Based on publicly available rankings and searches, Sunlike Solar does not appear as a routinely listed name on Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 reports, which limits its institutional recognition and makes bankability harder to verify for project lenders. ZNShine Solar, by contrast, traces its origins to 1988 and entered the photovoltaic industry in 2006, with its principal operations based in Jintan, Jiangsu. Since 2015 ZNShine has held Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 status without interruption and has earned a B rating in the PV Tech Bankability Ranking - giving it the considerably stronger institutional footprint of the two brands.

Sunlike Solar's current lineup centres on a TOPCon series built around 182 mm half-cut cells in the 610-630 W range, a format well suited to commercial rooftop and ground-mount projects where procurement is self-financed and cost is the primary variable. The company backs its panels with a 10-year product warranty and a 25-year performance guarantee - terms that are adequate but lean toward the lower end of what leading-tier manufacturers typically offer. ZNShine's catalog is meaningfully broader, covering residential, commercial and industrial, and utility-scale applications across more than 60 countries. The brand offers confirmed TOPCon bifacial modules ranging from approximately 435 W to over 660 W, with select series incorporating graphene-coated self-cleaning glass as a value-add feature. In 2025 ZNShine gained around 3.8 percentage points of non-residential market share to reach 11.7% in that segment - a concrete signal of growing developer and installer confidence.

For most international buyers - homeowners, C&I developers, or EPC contractors navigating project finance - ZNShine is the clearer default. Its decade-plus Tier 1 standing, verified bankability, and expanding market traction give banks, insurers, and asset managers a familiar and defensible reference point. Sunlike Solar can be a workable option in self-financed, cost-sensitive installations where lender bankability requirements do not apply, but the gap in institutional credibility is real and consequential for larger projects. The two brands are not interchangeable for externally financed schemes; for smaller owner-funded rooftop systems, the decision comes down to price and local distribution.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Sunlike Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/sunlike-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-znshine)
- [Sunlike Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/sunlike-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-znshine)
- [Sunlike Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/sunlike-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-znshine)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/sunlike-solar-vs-znshine

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.