---
title: "Suniva vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Suniva vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/suniva-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Suniva vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 0 models). Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Suniva | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | United States | China |
| Headquarters | Norcross, Georgia | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2007 | 1997 |
| Employees | 100-200 |  |
| Annual capacity | 1-3 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://suniva.com](https://suniva.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Suniva is an American manufacturer of monocrystalline silicon photovoltaic solar cells, spun out of Georgia Tech's University Center of Excellence in Photovoltaics in 2007. After filing for bankruptcy in 2017 and emerging under new ownership in 2019, the company restarted manufacturing operations in Norcross, Georgia...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Suniva | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 340 | +340 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 760 W | +760 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 520 W | +520 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Suniva | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.71% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Suniva | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.302%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.2 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Suniva | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Suniva | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Suniva | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Suniva is an American solar cell manufacturer founded in 2007 as a spinout from Georgia Tech, headquartered in Norcross, Georgia. It holds the distinction of being the oldest U.S.-based monocrystalline silicon cell producer, though its history includes a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing in 2017 after Asian import competition undercut its cost structure. Following a restructuring under new ownership, Suniva resumed cell production around 2024 and currently operates roughly 1 GW of capacity at its Georgia facility, with a $350 million, 4.5 GW expansion planned in Laurens, South Carolina, targeting a 2027 opening. The company does not appear on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 bankability list, though an engagement with research institute ISC Konstanz announced in early 2025 signals deliberate efforts to strengthen technical credibility. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 and headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu, China, operates at an entirely different scale - annual production capacity above 80 GW and cumulative global module shipments exceeding 292 GW as of mid-2025. Trina has been a consistent BloombergNEF Tier 1 name for many consecutive cycles and has earned a 100% bankability rating in BloombergNEF's PV Module Bankability survey eight times in succession. In terms of global institutional footprint, Trina Solar leads by a wide margin.

Trina Solar's product range spans all major market segments and is built around n-type TOPCon cell technology. The Vertex N series targets utility-scale ground-mount installations with modules reaching 760 W, while the Vertex S+ and Vertex S+ G3 lines serve commercial and residential rooftops - including dual-glass configurations with enhanced hail and wind resistance suited to variable climates across Europe and beyond. Suniva's current lineup is narrower, centered on monocrystalline cells and modules under the ARTisun brand, including the bifacial ARTisun STAR variant, with mass-produced cells claiming efficiencies above 23%. Suniva's most strategically distinctive asset is its supply chain rather than its panel specifications: a 2025 partnership with Corning and module integrator Heliene establishes a fully domestic American production chain, giving U.S. project developers a credible pathway to the IRA domestic content bonus tax credit adder.

For most international buyers, Trina Solar is the straightforward default choice - broad technology coverage from residential to utility scale, verified bankability, a global service network, and eleven consecutive PVEL Top Performer recognitions add up to a risk profile that is hard to argue against. Suniva's value proposition is narrowly specific: it matters most to U.S. developers for whom domestic content compliance unlocks meaningful federal tax credit adders that Trina's Chinese-manufactured panels cannot provide. Outside that regulatory context, the two manufacturers are not interchangeable on equal terms - Trina Solar is the more proven, more widely bankable, and more scalable choice for a typical buyer in most markets.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Suniva vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/suniva-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Suniva vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/suniva-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Suniva vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/suniva-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/suniva-vs-trina-solar