---
title: "SunEvo Solar vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare SunEvo Solar vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/sunevo-solar-vs-trina-solar"
---

# SunEvo Solar vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 204 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | SunEvo Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Hefei | Changzhou |
| Founded |  | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.sunevosolar.com](https://www.sunevosolar.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | SunEvo Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 204 | 340 | +136 |
| Max Power | 750 W | 760 W | +10 W |
| Avg Power | 528 W | 520 W | +8 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | SunEvo Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.10% | 24.80% | +0.70 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.92% | 21.71% | +0.20 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | SunEvo Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.303%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.001 |
| Bifacial Share | 96 (47%) | 145 (43%) | +4 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.2 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +0.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | SunEvo Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 6 (2.9%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 19 (9.3%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 52 (25.5%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 100 (49.0%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 27 (13.2%) | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | SunEvo Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 6 (2.9%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 89 (43.6%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 44 (21.6%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 47 (23.0%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (8.8%) | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (47%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | SunEvo Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 96 (47.1%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| Back Contact | 32 (15.7%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 27 (13.2%) | 11 (3.2%) |
| HJT | 24 (11.8%) | 0 |
| PERC | 20 (9.8%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| N-type | 5 (2.5%) | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, SunEvo Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SE6-66HBD-750W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-750w) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SE6-66HBD-745W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-745w) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SE6-66HBD-740W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-740w) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SE6-66HBD-735W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-735w) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SE6-66HBD-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SE6-66HBD-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SE6-66HBD-730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SE6-66HBD-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SE6-66HBD-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SE6-66HBD-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Trina Solar, founded in 1997 and headquartered in China, ranks among the world's top three solar module manufacturers by shipment volume, with cumulative global deliveries exceeding 205 GW across more than 100 countries and 77 GW shipped in 2024 alone. The company holds Tier 1 bankable status as recognized by Bloomberg NEF in Q1 2025 - confirmed for eleven consecutive years as a PVEL Top Performer - reflecting strong financial stability and long-term creditworthiness that are critical for project financing. SunEvo Solar, established in 2011 and also headquartered in China, operates at a significantly smaller scale with approximately 10 GW of cumulative shipments across more than 80 countries, and does not hold Tier 1 status. Despite the gap in scale and bankability, both manufacturers share n-type TOPCon as their leading cell technology and have achieved an identical maximum module efficiency of 24.1%, signaling that SunEvo competes on technical specifications even where it cannot match Trina's market footprint.

Trina Solar's portfolio of 305 panel models is anchored by its Vertex N series featuring 210 mm n-type TOPCon cells and TOPCon Ultra technology, with TOPCon covering 69.84% of its lineup. The breadth of Trina's range makes it well suited for utility-scale ground-mount projects, large commercial and industrial (C&I) installations, and any project requiring lender-approved bankable equipment at competitive cost. SunEvo Solar's narrower catalog of 204 models nonetheless shows meaningful competitive strengths: the company achieves a higher average panel power of 528.26 Wp versus 506.15 Wp for Trina, a higher average efficiency of 21.92% versus 21.51%, and a larger share of bifacial modules at 47.06% versus 39.02%. These characteristics make SunEvo a viable candidate for space-constrained residential rooftop installations or agrivoltaic and ground-mount projects where bifacial gain and high power density per module are priorities. Both manufacturers offer closely matched average product warranties of approximately 28 years and nearly identical temperature coefficients for Pmax at around -0.30%/°C, indicating comparable thermal performance in temperate climates.

For international buyers selecting between the two, Trina Solar's Tier 1 status, nearly three decades of operational history, and industry-leading shipment volumes provide a compelling case for risk-averse procurement - particularly in financed utility-scale or C&I projects where lender approval and long-term manufacturer support are non-negotiable. SunEvo Solar may appeal to buyers seeking competitive pricing on high-power bifacial modules for smaller residential or light commercial projects where bankability requirements are less stringent, and where the higher average wattage per panel can reduce balance-of-system costs on rooftops with limited area.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [SunEvo Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/sunevo-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [SunEvo Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/sunevo-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [SunEvo Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/sunevo-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/sunevo-solar-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.