---
title: "Sun Earth vs AIKO - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Sun Earth vs AIKO solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/sun-earth-vs-aiko"
---

# Sun Earth vs AIKO

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 60 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Sun Earth leans bifacial (63% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Sun Earth | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Shanghai |
| Founded |  | 2009 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | SZSE: 600732 |
| Website |  | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Sun Earth | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 60 | 144 | +84 |
| Max Power | 610 W | 805 W | +195 W |
| Avg Power | 510 W | 581 W | +72 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Sun Earth | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.80% | 25.20% | +1.40 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.42% | 23.65% | +1.24 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Sun Earth | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.294%/°C | -0.271%/°C | +0.023 |
| Bifacial Share | 38 (63%) | 35 (24%) | +39 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.9 yrs | 29.5 yrs | +1.4 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Sun Earth | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 2 (3.3%) | 3 (2.1%) |
| 20-21% | 2 (3.3%) | 3 (2.1%) |
| 21-22% | 14 (23.3%) | 3 (2.1%) |
| 22-23% | 20 (33.3%) | 12 (8.3%) |
| 23%+ | 22 (36.7%) | 123 (85.4%) |


## Power distribution

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)


| Power band | Sun Earth | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (3.3%) | 2 (1.4%) |
| 400-499W | 24 (40.0%) | 50 (34.7%) |
| 500-599W | 30 (50.0%) | 5 (3.5%) |
| 600-699W | 4 (6.7%) | 78 (54.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 9 (6.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (82%)

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)


| Technology | Sun Earth | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 49 (81.7%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 6 (10.0%) | 0 |
| PERC | 4 (6.7%) | 7 (4.9%) |
| BIPV | 1 (1.7%) | 0 |
| Back Contact | 0 | 119 (82.6%) |
| N-type | 0 | 17 (11.8%) |
| Flexible | 0 | 1 (0.7%) |


## Top panels, Sun Earth


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [DXM8-72HBG 610W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-610w) | 610 | 23.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [DXM8-72H-610](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72h-610) | 610 | 23.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [DXM8-72HBG 600W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-600w) | 600 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [DXM8-72H-600](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72h-600) | 600 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [DXM8-72HBG 590W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-590w) | 590 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [DXM8-72H-590](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72h-590) | 590 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SKT580M10-144D4](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-skt580m10-144d4) | 580 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [DXM8-72HBG 580W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-580w) | 580 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [DXM8-72H-580](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72h-580) | 580 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SKT575M10-144D4](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-skt575m10-144d4) | 575 | 22.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Sun Earth is a Chinese photovoltaic manufacturer with roughly 35 years of history producing complete solar modules through a vertically integrated process that spans from silicon to finished panel assembly. That heritage has kept the brand firmly in the affordable segment, and it appears across residential, commercial, and light industrial projects where cost-per-watt is the primary driver. The brand does not appear on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 Solar Module Maker list in available search results, which limits its bankability for large, non-recourse-financed projects. AIKO (Shanghai Aiko Solar Energy), by contrast, was founded around 2009 as a cell specialist before expanding to end-to-end module production, and it achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status in Q3 2024 with a reported production capacity of approximately 20 GW as of early 2025. That institutional recognition gives AIKO a meaningfully stronger footprint with project lenders and large commercial buyers.

Product-wise, Sun Earth's current catalog leans heavily on TOPCon cell technology with a strong bifacial share, making its panels a practical match for budget-conscious ground-mount and commercial-rooftop installations. AIKO is defined almost entirely by its proprietary ABC (All Back Contact) technology, which moves all conductors to the rear of the cell to maximize light capture. AIKO has held the top position in TaiyangNews global module efficiency rankings continuously since March 2023, and independent Australian reviews describe the Neostar 3 series as one of the highest-performing residential panels available. AIKO took first place in the 2025 SolarQuotes Installers' Choice Awards, reflecting strong real-world installer satisfaction.

For a typical buyer in 2025, AIKO is the clearer choice when performance, warranty degradation rates, and long-term bankability matter - particularly for premium residential rooftops or financed commercial projects. Sun Earth remains a reasonable option where upfront cost is the overriding constraint and project-finance requirements are absent. The two brands are not interchangeable: they occupy meaningfully different tiers of the market.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/manufacturers/sun-earth-solar-power \| Sun Earth Solar Power - manufacturer profile and customer ratings \| review

\- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/blog/sun-earth-reliable-affordable-solar-panels-with-a-35-year-history/ \| Sun-Earth: Reliable, affordable solar panels with a 35-year history \| article

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html \| Aiko Solar - full manufacturer review by SolarQuotes \| review

\- https://solarbytes.info/aiko-secures-global-bnef-tier1-solar-maker-status-q3-2024/ \| AIKO excels with BNEF Tier 1 solar ranking - Q3 2024 \| article

\- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdkVNV5djeA \| NEW AIKO Neostar 3 Review - Are Aiko Solar Panels the BEST in 2025? \| video

Sources:

\- \[Sun Earth Solar Panels - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/manufacturers/sun-earth-solar-power)

\- \[Sun-Earth: 35-year history - SolarChoice\](https://www.solarchoice.net.au/blog/sun-earth-reliable-affordable-solar-panels-with-a-35-year-history/)

\- \[Aiko Solar Review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html)

\- \[AIKO BNEF Tier 1 status Q3 2024 - SolarBytes\](https://solarbytes.info/aiko-secures-global-bnef-tier1-solar-maker-status-q3-2024/)

\- \[AIKO Neostar 3 Review - YouTube\](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdkVNV5djeA)

\- \[Sun Earth Solar Panels Review 2026 - ComparePV\](https://comparepv.com/reviews/sun-earth)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Sun Earth vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/sun-earth-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko)
- [Sun Earth vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/sun-earth-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aiko)
- [Sun Earth vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/sun-earth-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aiko)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/sun-earth-vs-aiko

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.