---
title: "SpolarPV vs AKCOME - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare SpolarPV vs AKCOME solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/spolarpv-vs-akcome"
---

# SpolarPV vs AKCOME

SpolarPV has the broader catalog (62 vs 3 models). SpolarPV leads on peak efficiency at 22.86%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | SpolarPV | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Suzhou | Suzhou |
| Founded |  | 2003 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.spolarpv.com](https://www.spolarpv.com) | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | SpolarPV | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 62 | 3 | +59 |
| Max Power | 700 W | 700 W |  |
| Avg Power | 488 W | 672 W | +183 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | SpolarPV | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.86% | 22.54% | +0.32 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.81% | 21.63% | +0.82 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | SpolarPV | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.333%/°C | -0.240%/°C | +0.093 |
| Bifacial Share | 17 (27%) | 3 (100%) | +73 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.7 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +2.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution


| Efficiency band | SpolarPV | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 15 (24.2%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 8 (12.9%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 20 (32.3%) | 2 (66.7%) |
| 22-23% | 19 (30.6%) | 1 (33.3%) |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | SpolarPV | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 16 (25.8%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 13 (21.0%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 22 (35.5%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 10 (16.1%) | 2 (66.7%) |
| 700W+ | 1 (1.6%) | 1 (33.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (48%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)


| Technology | SpolarPV | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 30 (48.4%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 28 (45.2%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 4 (6.5%) | 0 |
| HJT | 0 | 3 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, SpolarPV


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SPV700-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv700-tg12-132bd) | 700 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SPV695-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv695-tg12-132bd) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SPV690-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv690-tg12-132bd) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SPV685-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv685-tg12-132bd) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SPV680-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv680-tg12-132bd) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SPV675-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv675-tg12-132bd) | 675 | 21.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SPV670-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv670-tg12-132bd) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SPV665-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv665-tg12-132bd) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SPV660-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv660-tg12-132bd) | 660 | 21.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SP605HM6-60L](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-sp605hm6-60l) | 605 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AKCOME is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Zhangjiagang, Jiangsu Province, founded in 2006 and listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange. It has evolved from a components and accessories supplier into a broader photovoltaic power generation operator, and it is recognized as a BloombergNEF Tier 1 solar module manufacturer with N-type cell technology and a cumulative shipment history in the tens of gigawatts. SpolarPV Technology, by contrast, is a smaller Chinese manufacturer founded in 2010 and headquartered in Nanjing, operating a single production facility with an annual capacity in the hundreds of megawatts rather than gigawatts. It holds standard industry certifications such as TUV, CE and ISO, but available sources do not confirm current BloombergNEF Tier 1 status for the brand. On institutional footprint, AKCOME is the clearly larger and more established player, with public-company reporting, decades of manufacturing history, and formal bankability recognition, while SpolarPV operates at a more regional, boutique scale.

In terms of product focus, AKCOME's portfolio centers on N-type modules aimed at utility-scale and larger commercial installations, reflecting its scale as a vertically diversified group that also runs its own power stations. SpolarPV markets a broader mix of module types, including PERC and TOPCon cells alongside dual-glass, full-black and BIPV (building-integrated photovoltaic) products, positioning itself toward residential rooftops, smaller commercial projects, and niche architectural applications such as facades, particularly in European and other export markets served through its Switzerland-based distribution hub.

For a typical buyer in 2025, AKCOME is generally the safer default where bankability, financing eligibility, and large-project track record matter, given its confirmed Tier 1 status and greater production scale. SpolarPV can be a reasonable option for smaller residential or specialty BIPV projects where its more flexible, boutique product range is a better fit, but buyers should verify current certifications and warranty support directly, since it lacks the same level of independently documented institutional backing.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.vicoexport.com/en/64212/tier-1-solar-panel-manufacturers-list-q4-2025/ \| Tier 1 Solar Panel Manufacturers List - Q4 2025 \| article

\- https://en.akcome.com/course \| AKCOME company history and background \| article

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/spolarpv \| SpolarPV Technology Co., Ltd. company profile \| article

\- https://comparepv.com/reviews/spolarpv \| SpolarPV Solar Panels Review 2026: Pros, Cons and Specs \| review

\- https://assets.bnef.com/public/tiering/solarmodules.pdf \| BloombergNEF Tier 1 Solar Module Methodology \| article

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [SpolarPV vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/spolarpv-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-akcome)
- [SpolarPV vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/spolarpv-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-akcome)
- [SpolarPV vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/spolarpv-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-akcome)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/spolarpv-vs-akcome

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.