---
title: "SpolarPV vs AEET - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare SpolarPV vs AEET solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/spolarpv-vs-aeet"
---

# SpolarPV vs AEET

SpolarPV has the broader catalog (62 vs 5 models). SpolarPV leads on peak efficiency at 22.86%. SpolarPV leans bifacial (27% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | SpolarPV | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China |  |
| Headquarters | Suzhou |  |
| Founded |  |  |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.spolarpv.com](https://www.spolarpv.com) |  |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | SpolarPV | AEET | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 62 | 5 | +57 |
| Max Power | 700 W | 200 W | +500 W |
| Avg Power | 488 W | 190 W | +298 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | SpolarPV | AEET | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.86% | 15.70% | +7.16 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.81% | 14.90% | +5.91 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | SpolarPV | AEET | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.333%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 17 (27%) | 0 (0%) | +27 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.7 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +2.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution


| Efficiency band | SpolarPV | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 15 (24.2%) | 5 (100.0%) |
| 20-21% | 8 (12.9%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 20 (32.3%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 19 (30.6%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

SpolarPV offers more 600W+ panels (18% of lineup)


| Power band | SpolarPV | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 16 (25.8%) | 5 (100.0%) |
| 400-499W | 13 (21.0%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 22 (35.5%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 10 (16.1%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 1 (1.6%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (48%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)


| Technology | SpolarPV | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 30 (48.4%) | 5 (100.0%) |
| TOPCon | 28 (45.2%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 4 (6.5%) | 0 |


## Top panels, SpolarPV


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SPV700-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv700-tg12-132bd) | 700 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SPV695-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv695-tg12-132bd) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SPV690-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv690-tg12-132bd) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SPV685-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv685-tg12-132bd) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SPV680-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv680-tg12-132bd) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SPV675-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv675-tg12-132bd) | 675 | 21.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SPV670-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv670-tg12-132bd) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SPV665-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv665-tg12-132bd) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SPV660-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-spv660-tg12-132bd) | 660 | 21.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SP605HM6-60L](https://comparepv.com/panel/spolarpv-sp605hm6-60l) | 605 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AEET


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AEET, operating through AEET Energy Group and its manufacturing arm AE Solar, is a German company founded in Königsbrunn, Bavaria in 2003, with production facilities in China, Georgia and Turkey and a combined annual capacity of roughly 2.5 GW. The company has been named a BloombergNEF Tier 1 PV module manufacturer for five consecutive years as of the first quarter of 2026, its 17th such recognition since first qualifying in 2021, reflecting a solid banking and project-financing track record. SpolarPV, by contrast, is a Chinese manufacturer based in Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, founded in 2010, with a considerably smaller stated production footprint of around 800 MW annually and a sales network spanning over 50 countries; no BloombergNEF Tier 1 listing or major independent review coverage for the brand turned up in available sources. On institutional footprint, AEET holds the clearer edge, with a longer verified bankability history and larger, more geographically diversified manufacturing base.

Product-wise, AEET markets a broad module lineup including mono- and poly-crystalline and bifacial panels aimed at both residential rooftop and commercial/utility-scale installations across Europe, the Middle East and beyond, leveraging its European headquarters for CE-market credibility. SpolarPV positions itself primarily as an OEM/ODM supplier, offering N-type TOPCon modules, including MBB (multi-busbar) and dual-glass configurations, in power classes from roughly 430W to 700W, generally serving private-label and export customers such as distributors and system integrators building commercial or BIPV projects rather than end consumers directly.

For a typical buyer in 2025 prioritizing bankability, warranty confidence and traceable project financing, AEET is the safer default given its sustained Tier 1 status and longer operating history. SpolarPV can be a reasonable option for buyers seeking TOPCon technology through an OEM relationship or private-label sourcing, but its lack of independent Tier 1 confirmation and limited third-party review coverage mean it carries more due-diligence risk and is better suited to sourcing-savvy commercial buyers than residential consumers.

\---LINKS---

\- https://ae-solar.com/company/news/56 \| AE Solar named BloombergNEF Tier 1 PV Module Manufacturer \| article

\- https://mesia.com/aesolar-bloombergnef-tier-1-pv-module-manufacturer-fifth-consecutive-year/ \| AESOLAR: 5 years straight as BloombergNEF Tier 1 solar manufacturer \| article

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH company profile \| article

\- https://www.spolarpv.com/about-us \| SpolarPV Technology Co., Ltd company profile \| article

\- https://assets.bnef.com/public/tiering/solarmodules.pdf \| BloombergNEF Tier 1 Solar Module Methodology \| article

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [SpolarPV vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/spolarpv-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aeet)
- [SpolarPV vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/spolarpv-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [SpolarPV vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/spolarpv-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aeet)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/spolarpv-vs-aeet

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.