---
title: "Solitek vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Solitek vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/solitek-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Solitek vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 49 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Solitek leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Solitek | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Lithuania | China |
| Headquarters | Vilnius | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2009 | 1997 |
| Employees | 100-500 |  |
| Annual capacity | 0.1-0.5 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.solitek.eu](https://www.solitek.eu) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

SoliTek is a European solar panel and energy storage manufacturer headquartered in Vilnius, Lithuania, and is the largest solar module producer in Northern Europe. Part of the family-owned BOD Group, the company operates a fully automated production line with approximately 250 MW of annual module capacity and exports...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Solitek | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 49 | 340 | +291 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 760 W | +40 W |
| Avg Power | 427 W | 520 W | +93 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Solitek | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.18% | 24.80% | +1.62 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.43% | 21.71% | +1.29 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Solitek | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.301%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.000 |
| Bifacial Share | 49 (100%) | 145 (43%) | +57 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Solitek | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 15 (30.6%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 21-22% | 4 (8.2%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 28 (57.1%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 2 (4.1%) | 76 (22.4%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Solitek | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 15 (30.6%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 28 (57.1%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 2 (4.1%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 2 (4.1%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 2 (4.1%) | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (98%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Solitek | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 48 (98.0%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| Unknown | 1 (2.0%) | 11 (3.2%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Solitek


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Forza 720](https://comparepv.com/panel/ginlong-solis-forza-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SOLID Framed White 720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ginlong-solis-solid-framed-white-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Forza 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/ginlong-solis-forza-650) | 650 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SOLID Framed White 650W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ginlong-solis-solid-framed-white-650w) | 650 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Magnus 510](https://comparepv.com/panel/ginlong-solis-magnus-510) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SOLID Framed Transparent 505](https://comparepv.com/panel/ginlong-solis-solid-framed-transparent-505) | 505 | 22.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SOLRIF D Black 455](https://comparepv.com/panel/ginlong-solis-solrif-d-black-455) | 455 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SOLID Semi-Clear Framed 455 W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ginlong-solis-solid-semi-clear-framed-455-w) | 455 | 22.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SOLRIF N Black 455](https://comparepv.com/panel/ginlong-solis-solrif-n-black-455) | 455 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SOLID Black Frameless 455](https://comparepv.com/panel/ginlong-solis-solid-black-frameless-455) | 455 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Solitek is a European solar module manufacturer headquartered in Vilnius, Lithuania, founded in 2009 as Baltic Solar Solutions. The company operates a dedicated production facility in Vilnius running on 100% renewable electricity, with an annual manufacturing capacity of approximately 250 MW - a scale that places it firmly in the specialist, smaller-volume segment of the global industry. Solitek does not appear on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 module list, a designation typically reserved for high-volume producers with demonstrated project-finance acceptance across multiple banks. Trina Solar, by contrast, is a large-scale Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, that has grown into one of the world's leading PV module suppliers. By the close of 2024, its cumulative global module shipments had surpassed 260 GW, with annual volumes exceeding 80 GW. Trina has held Tier 1 BloombergNEF bankability status for many consecutive years and is routinely specified in utility-scale project finance worldwide. In terms of institutional footprint and lending-community recognition, Trina Solar operates in a different category.

Solitek's catalogue is built entirely around glass-glass bifacial modules using N-type TOPCon cells, sold under the SOLID series. The product line targets residential rooftops and smaller commercial installations, with the manufacturer emphasising long-term durability, fire resistance, and the yield gains from bifacial light capture - a 2024 company study reported up to 16% additional energy yield versus monofacial alternatives. A new fully automated production line was commissioned in early 2026, signalling continued investment in European manufacturing. Trina Solar covers a far broader range through its Vertex product family. The Vertex N i-TOPCon Ultra series - reaching outputs up to 760 W with a module efficiency of 24.5% - is aimed at utility-scale ground-mount projects, while the Vertex S+ G3 dual-glass TOPCon line addresses residential and light commercial rooftops at up to 485 W. A 670 W variant bridges the C&I segment. Trina also supplies large-scale battery storage through its Trina Storage division, which holds its own BloombergNEF Tier 1 ranking.

For most international buyers working on utility-scale or large C&I projects that require institutional financing, Trina Solar is the natural default choice - Tier 1 bankability, global supply-chain depth, and broad lender acceptance are decisive advantages at that scale. Solitek fills a legitimate and growing niche for buyers in European markets who prioritise locally manufactured, traceable modules - whether driven by Made-in-Europe procurement mandates, ESG supply-chain reporting requirements, or energy security concerns - particularly on residential and small commercial rooftops. The two brands are not interchangeable and serve distinctly different buyer profiles at very different production scales.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Solitek vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/solitek-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Solitek vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/solitek-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Solitek vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/solitek-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/solitek-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.