---
title: "Solarspace vs SunKean - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Solarspace vs SunKean solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/solarspace-vs-sunkean"
---

# Solarspace vs SunKean

Solarspace has the broader catalog (82 vs 57 models). SunKean leads on peak efficiency at 23.52%. Solarspace leans bifacial (93% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Solarspace | SunKean |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Xuzhou | Wuxi, Jiangsu |
| Founded | 2011 | 2013 |
| Employees | 6000+ | 200+ |
| Annual capacity | 60+ GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://solarspace.com](https://solarspace.com) | [https://www.sunkean.com](https://www.sunkean.com) |

SolarSpace is a world-leading solar cell and module manufacturer, focusing on high-efficiency solar technology production both in China and overseas. They are among the top solar cell manufacturers, providing high-quality solar modules with core cell technology worldwide. SolarSpace is dedicated to empowering solar...

SUNKEAN specializes in providing sustainable energy connection solutions to global customers. They offer a range of products including solar cables, wire harnesses, and related connectors for photovoltaic, energy storage, and charging sectors. As of 2025, SUNKEAN employs over 200 people and operates a production...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Solarspace | SunKean | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 82 | 57 | +25 |
| Max Power | 710 W | 700 W | +10 W |
| Avg Power | 539 W | 447 W | +92 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Solarspace | SunKean | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.16% | 23.52% | +0.36 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.04% | 21.25% | +0.79 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Solarspace | SunKean | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.299%/°C | -0.300%/°C | +0.000 |
| Bifacial Share | 76 (93%) | 44 (77%) | +15 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.6 yrs | 28.9 yrs | +0.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

SunKean skews to higher efficiency: 9% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Solarspace | SunKean |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 7 (8.5%) | 7 (12.3%) |
| 21-22% | 26 (31.7%) | 16 (28.1%) |
| 22-23% | 46 (56.1%) | 20 (35.1%) |
| 23%+ | 3 (3.7%) | 5 (8.8%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 9 (15.8%) |


## Power distribution

Solarspace offers more 600W+ panels (33% of lineup)


| Power band | Solarspace | SunKean |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 1 (1.2%) | 11 (19.3%) |
| 400-499W | 35 (42.7%) | 35 (61.4%) |
| 500-599W | 19 (23.2%) | 6 (10.5%) |
| 600-699W | 24 (29.3%) | 4 (7.0%) |
| 700W+ | 3 (3.7%) | 1 (1.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (70%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (39%)


| Technology | Solarspace | SunKean |
| --- | --- | --- |
| N-type | 57 (69.5%) | 8 (14.0%) |
| PERC | 18 (22.0%) | 13 (22.8%) |
| TOPCon | 7 (8.5%) | 22 (38.6%) |
| HJT | 0 | 14 (24.6%) |


## Top panels, Solarspace


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SS9-66HD-710N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-710n) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SS9-66HD-705N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-705n) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SS9-66HD-700N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-700n) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SS9-66HD-695N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-695n) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SS9-66HD-690N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-690n) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SS9-66HD-685N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-685n) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SS9-66HD-680N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-680n) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SS9-66HD-675N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-675n) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SS9-66HD-670M](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-670m) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.330 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SS9-66HD-670N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-670n) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, SunKean


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKT700M12-132D5](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt700m12-132d5) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKT695M12-132D5](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt695m12-132d5) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKT690M12-132D5](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt690m12-132d5) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SKT685M12-132D5](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt685m12-132d5) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SKT680M12-132D5](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt680m12-132d5) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SKT555M10](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt555m10) | 555 | 21.5 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SKT550M10](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt550m10) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SKT545M10](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt545m10) | 545 | 21.1 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SKT540M10](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt540m10) | 540 | 20.9 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SKT535M10](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt535m10) | 535 | 20.7 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |


## Other comparisons

- [Solarspace vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/solarspace-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs SunKean](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-sunkean)
- [Solarspace vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/solarspace-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs SunKean](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-sunkean)
- [Solarspace vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/solarspace-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs SunKean](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-sunkean)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/solarspace-vs-sunkean

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.

