---
title: "Solarever vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Solarever vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/solarever-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Solarever vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 12 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Solarever leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Solarever | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Mexico | China |
| Headquarters | Colima | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2012 | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity | 1-2 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.solarever.com.mx](https://www.solarever.com.mx) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Solarever is a Mexican solar panel manufacturer, recognized as the number one national solar brand in Mexico, with a main production facility in the state of Colima. The company produces monocrystalline half-cut mono PERC solar panels and expanded into the US market in 2015-2016 through Solarever USA, with offices in...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Solarever | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 12 | 340 | +328 |
| Max Power | 630 W | 760 W | +130 W |
| Avg Power | 550 W | 520 W | +30 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Solarever | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.52% | 24.80% | +1.28 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.88% | 21.71% | +1.16 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Solarever | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.294%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.008 |
| Bifacial Share | 12 (100%) | 145 (43%) | +57 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Solarever skews to higher efficiency: 42% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Solarever | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 22-23% | 7 (58.3%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 5 (41.7%) | 76 (22.4%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |


## Power distribution

Solarever offers more 600W+ panels (58% of lineup)


| Power band | Solarever | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 5 (41.7%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 600-699W | 7 (58.3%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Solarever | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 12 (100.0%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Solarever


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SE-182\*105-630M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-630m-132-bd) | 630 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SE-182\*105-625M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-625m-132-bd) | 625 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SE-182\*105-620M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-620m-132-bd) | 620 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SE-182\*105-615M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-615m-132-bd) | 615 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SE-182\*105-610M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-610m-132-bd) | 610 | 22.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SE-182\*105-605M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-605m-132-bd) | 605 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SE-182\*105-600M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-600m-132-bd) | 600 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SE-182\*105-470M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-470m-96-bd) | 470 | 23.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SE-182\*105-465M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-465m-96-bd) | 465 | 23.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SE-182\*105-460M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-460m-96-bd) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Trina Solar is a Chinese manufacturer founded in December 1997 in Changzhou, Jiangsu province, and has grown into one of only five producers worldwide with annual manufacturing capacity above 80 GW, having shipped more than 292 GW of modules globally by mid 2025. It has earned BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status for eight consecutive years, making it one of the most institutionally trusted names in the industry. Solarever, by contrast, is the brand of Solarever Group, an American holding company founded in 2012 and headquartered in Lake Forest, California, with modules designed at a Chinese R&D center and manufactured at a roughly 1.1 GW facility in Tecoman, Mexico; it is still working toward BNEF Tier 1 recognition rather than holding it. On scale, track record and third party bankability validation, Trina Solar clearly has the stronger institutional footprint.

Solarever's lineup targets residential and light commercial rooftops, offering monocrystalline half-cut PERC panels rated 400 to 560 W with 20.5 to 22.5 percent efficiency and an all-black aesthetic favored by installers in the US, Mexico and Latin America. Trina Solar covers a much broader range built around n-type TOPCon cell technology under its Vertex brand, including Vertex S plus modules for homes and commercial roofs and bifacial dual glass Vertex N and NEG series modules for utility scale ground mount projects, reaching outputs up to 760 W and efficiencies approaching 25 percent.

For most buyers, especially those financing large or utility scale projects where bankability matters to lenders, Trina Solar is the safer default given its confirmed Tier 1 status, longer operating history and mature TOPCon platform, while Solarever is a reasonable option mainly for smaller residential jobs in its core North American and Latin American markets where its lack of formal Tier 1 status is less of a concern.

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Solarever vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/solarever-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Solarever vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/solarever-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Solarever vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/solarever-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/solarever-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.