---
title: "SolarEdge vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare SolarEdge vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/solaredge-vs-trina-solar"
---

# SolarEdge vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 0 models). Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | SolarEdge | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Israel | China |
| Headquarters | Herzliya | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2006 | 1997 |
| Employees | 3000-5000 |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed | NASDAQ: SEDG |  |
| Website | [https://www.solaredge.com](https://www.solaredge.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

SolarEdge Technologies is an Israeli energy technology company specializing in DC-optimized inverter systems, power optimizers, and energy management solutions for solar PV installations. The company is a global leader in smart inverter technology, enabling module-level monitoring and optimization to maximize energy...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | SolarEdge | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 340 | +340 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 760 W | +760 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 520 W | +520 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | SolarEdge | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.71% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | SolarEdge | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.302%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.2 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | SolarEdge | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | SolarEdge | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | SolarEdge | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

SolarEdge is an Israeli technology company founded in 2006 and headquartered in Herzliya, best known as a manufacturer of DC power optimizers and inverters rather than a traditional panel producer. The company introduced its own solar modules - branded as Smart Modules, with integrated optimizers - only in 2019, manufacturing them through partnerships with third-party producers such as JA Solar and Luxor. SolarEdge does not appear on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 module manufacturer list, a meaningful distinction for project finance and institutional procurement. The company went through significant financial stress in 2023-2024, including a restructuring that involved laying off around 1,800 employees and reporting steep revenue declines. Trina Solar, by contrast, is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 1997 that has consistently ranked among the world's top five module producers. It has achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status for eight consecutive years, including a 100% bankability score in 2025, and its annual module production capacity now exceeds 80 GW, with cumulative global shipments surpassing 292 GW as of mid-2025. In terms of institutional footprint and manufacturing scale, Trina Solar holds a clear and measurable advantage.

The two companies serve meaningfully different market roles. SolarEdge is fundamentally an energy management platform - its optimizers, inverters, batteries, and software form a tightly integrated ecosystem, and its Smart Modules are designed as components within that system rather than standalone products. This makes SolarEdge relevant for residential and commercial rooftop projects where module-level monitoring or shading mitigation is a priority. Trina Solar offers a full-spectrum module portfolio spanning all application segments: the compact Vertex S+ G3 series targets residential rooftops, mid-range commercial modules address C&I needs, and the large-format bifacial Vertex N G3 panels - reaching up to 760 W output using n-type i-TOPCon technology - are engineered for utility-scale ground-mount projects. Trina has recorded module efficiencies up to 24.5% on flagship models and has been recognized as a PVEL Top Performer for eleven consecutive years.

For most international buyers - installers, EPCs, or project developers - Trina Solar is the more straightforward default choice, offering confirmed bankability, financial stability, broad product coverage, and independently verified performance across all deployment scales. SolarEdge becomes the relevant option specifically when a buyer wants a fully integrated optimizer-inverter-battery ecosystem; as a standalone module supplier it cannot be directly compared to Trina on equal terms. These two brands are not interchangeable - they serve different architectural roles within a solar installation.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [SolarEdge vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/solaredge-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [SolarEdge vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/solaredge-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [SolarEdge vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/solaredge-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/solaredge-vs-trina-solar