---
title: "Solar N Plus vs Sunova - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Solar N Plus vs Sunova solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/solar-n-plus-vs-sunova"
---

# Solar N Plus vs Sunova

Sunova has the broader catalog (183 vs 149 models). Solar N Plus leads on peak efficiency at 23.30%. Sunova leans bifacial (92% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Solar N Plus | Sunova |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Hefei |
| Founded |  | 2008 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website |  | [https://www.sunovasolar.com](https://www.sunovasolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Solar N Plus | Sunova | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 149 | 183 | +34 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 720 W |  |
| Avg Power | 506 W | 523 W | +17 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Solar N Plus | Sunova | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.30% | 23.20% | +0.10 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.96% | 21.60% | +0.36 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Solar N Plus | Sunova | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.316%/°C | -0.317%/°C | +0.001 |
| Bifacial Share | 111 (74%) | 168 (92%) | +17 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.7 yrs | 28.4 yrs | +1.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Solar N Plus skews to higher efficiency: 11% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Solar N Plus | Sunova |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 21 (14.1%) | 46 (25.1%) |
| 21-22% | 42 (28.2%) | 70 (38.3%) |
| 22-23% | 70 (47.0%) | 57 (31.1%) |
| 23%+ | 16 (10.7%) | 10 (5.5%) |


## Power distribution

Sunova offers more 600W+ panels (22% of lineup)


| Power band | Solar N Plus | Sunova |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 7 (4.7%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 77 (51.7%) | 84 (45.9%) |
| 500-599W | 36 (24.2%) | 58 (31.7%) |
| 600-699W | 19 (12.8%) | 31 (16.9%) |
| 700W+ | 10 (6.7%) | 10 (5.5%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (56%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (49%)


| Technology | Solar N Plus | Sunova |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 83 (55.7%) | 12 (6.6%) |
| PERC | 35 (23.5%) | 89 (48.6%) |
| N-type | 26 (17.4%) | 72 (39.3%) |
| Unknown | 5 (3.4%) | 10 (5.5%) |


## Top panels, Solar N Plus


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SP-N18/132HG-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/solar-n-plus-sp-n18-132hg-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SP-N18/132HG 720](https://comparepv.com/panel/solar-n-plus-sp-n18-132hg-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SP-N18/132HG-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/solar-n-plus-sp-n18-132hg-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SP-N18/132HG 715](https://comparepv.com/panel/solar-n-plus-sp-n18-132hg-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SP-N18/132HG-710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/solar-n-plus-sp-n18-132hg-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SP-N18/132HG 710](https://comparepv.com/panel/solar-n-plus-sp-n18-132hg-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SP-N18/132HG-705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/solar-n-plus-sp-n18-132hg-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SP-N18/132HG 705](https://comparepv.com/panel/solar-n-plus-sp-n18-132hg-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SP-N18/132HG-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/solar-n-plus-sp-n18-132hg-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SP-N18/132HG 700](https://comparepv.com/panel/solar-n-plus-sp-n18-132hg-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Sunova


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TS-BGT66(720)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-720-g12) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TS-BWT66(720)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-720-g12) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TS-BGT66(715)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-715-g12) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TS-BWT66(715)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-715-g12) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TS-BGT66(710)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-710-g12) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TS-BWT66(710)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-710-g12) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TS-BGT66(705)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-705-g12) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TS-BWT66(705)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-705-g12) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TS-BGT66(700)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-700-g12) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TS-BWT66(700)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-700-g12) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Solar N Plus is a Chinese solar module manufacturer headquartered in Chuzhou, Anhui Province, with additional production bases in Yunnan and Jilin and overseas facilities in Laos and Indonesia. The company focuses primarily on N-type TOPCon cell and module technology, with announced capacity of around 10 GW for TOPCon production and a supplementary 2 GW PERC line. Solar N Plus does not appear on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability list, which places it at a disadvantage for project finance in large-scale deployments. Sunova Solar Technology Co., Ltd., founded in 2016 and based in Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, has maintained its BloombergNEF Tier 1 designation continuously through 2024, including under the more stringent criteria requiring at least six reference projects of 5 MW or larger. By the end of 2024, Sunova had shipped a cumulative 7.1 GW of modules worldwide and operates an integrated manufacturing base across four factories in China and Vietnam, reducing supply-chain concentration risk. On the strength of its verified bankability and documented shipment volume, Sunova holds the stronger institutional footprint of the two.

Both manufacturers have made TOPCon N-type technology central to their current product families. Solar N Plus offers large-format bifacial modules - including 132-cell, 610-630 W configurations - aimed primarily at utility-scale and commercial-industrial ground-mounted systems, alongside smaller all-black modules for residential rooftops. Sunova's Tangra series, introduced at SNEC 2024, spans the same range of applications: the Tangra L HD reaches up to 615 W with 22.8 percent efficiency for utility deployments, while the Tangra M Pro 585 targets commercial rooftops. The company also carries HJT modules in its portfolio, giving buyers an alternative high-efficiency cell technology not available from Solar N Plus.

For most international buyers - whether a European developer financing a utility farm or a distributor sourcing panels for residential installers - Sunova is the more prudent default choice. Its confirmed Tier 1 status, broader track record across multiple continents, and access to project financing give it a meaningful edge. Solar N Plus may be a viable option on cost-sensitive projects where the installer has first-hand field experience with the brand, but the absence of a Tier 1 rating warrants careful due diligence before committing to large procurement volumes.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Solar N Plus vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/solar-n-plus-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Sunova](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-sunova)
- [Solar N Plus vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/solar-n-plus-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Sunova](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-sunova)
- [Solar N Plus vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/solar-n-plus-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Sunova](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-sunova)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/solar-n-plus-vs-sunova

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.

