---
title: "Solar Frontier vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Solar Frontier vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/solar-frontier-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Solar Frontier vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 0 models). Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Solar Frontier | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Japan | China |
| Headquarters | Tokyo | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2006 | 1997 |
| Employees | 1,500 |  |
| Annual capacity | 1 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.solar-frontier.com/eng/](https://www.solar-frontier.com/eng/) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Solar Frontier is a leading CIS thin-film solar energy company specializing in the development and manufacturing of CIS (Copper-Indium-Selenium) thin-film solar modules. The company is headquartered in Tokyo, Japan, and is a fully owned subsidiary of Showa Shell Sekiyu, now part of Idemitsu Kosan Group. Solar...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Solar Frontier | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 340 | +340 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 760 W | +760 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 520 W | +520 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Solar Frontier | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.71% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Solar Frontier | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.302%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.2 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Solar Frontier | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Solar Frontier | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Solar Frontier | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Solar Frontier is a Japanese company headquartered in Tokyo, established in 2006 as a subsidiary of Showa Shell Sekiyu, which was later acquired by oil refiner Idemitsu Kosan. It built its reputation as the world's largest manufacturer of CIS (copper-indium-selenium) thin-film solar modules, with its flagship Kunitomi plant in Miyazaki Prefecture reaching a production capacity of over 1 GW per year at peak. However, the company ceased CIS module production by mid-2022 and has since repositioned itself as a PV system developer and OEM buyer rather than a panel manufacturer in any conventional sense. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 and headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu, China, operates on an entirely different scale - the company carries an annual nameplate production capacity of approximately 100 GW, with cumulative module shipments surpassing 292 GW worldwide by mid-2025. Trina Solar has earned BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status eight consecutive times with a 100% bankability rating, giving it a substantially stronger institutional footprint than Solar Frontier in today's global market.

Trina Solar's current product portfolio covers residential rooftop, commercial and industrial (C&I), and utility-scale ground-mount applications. Its Vertex S and Vertex S+ series target residential and C&I rooftop buyers, with N-type i-TOPCon cells delivering efficiencies up to 22.5%, available in all-black monofacial and bifacial dual-glass configurations. For large-scale ground-mount developers, the NEG21 bifacial series reaches outputs up to 760 W with module efficiency approaching 24.5%. Solar Frontier, by contrast, no longer manufactures panels under its own brand at any meaningful scale outside Japan, and its current commercial focus is on EPC project delivery in the domestic Japanese market using OEM-sourced modules. International buyers seeking Solar Frontier-branded panels will find no active global supply chain to engage with.

For virtually any buyer evaluating these two brands - whether a homeowner, a commercial developer, or a utility-scale project financier - Trina Solar is the clear and practical choice. It is actively manufacturing at scale, widely distributed across international markets, consistently Tier 1 bankable, and backed by competitive long-term warranties. Solar Frontier, while historically innovative, has exited the panel manufacturing market and cannot be considered a comparable purchasing option today. These brands are not interchangeable: one is a thriving global manufacturer, the other is effectively a legacy name in module supply.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Solar Frontier vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/solar-frontier-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Solar Frontier vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/solar-frontier-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Solar Frontier vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/solar-frontier-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/solar-frontier-vs-trina-solar