---
title: "SMA Solar vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare SMA Solar vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/sma-solar-vs-trina-solar"
---

# SMA Solar vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 0 models). Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | SMA Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Germany | China |
| Headquarters | Niestetal | Changzhou |
| Founded | 1981 | 1997 |
| Employees | 3000-5000 |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed | ETR: S92 |  |
| Website | [https://www.sma.de](https://www.sma.de) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

SMA Solar Technology AG is a leading German manufacturer of solar inverters for photovoltaic systems, serving residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications worldwide. Founded in 1981, the company is the largest solar technology company in Europe by revenue and operates in over 190 countries. SMA focuses...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | SMA Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 340 | +340 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 760 W | +760 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 520 W | +520 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | SMA Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.71% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | SMA Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.302%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.2 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | SMA Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | SMA Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | SMA Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

SMA Solar Technology AG is a German company headquartered in Niestetal, Hesse, founded in 1981 and widely regarded as Europe's largest solar technology company by revenue - achieving over 1.5 billion euros in sales in 2024. A critical distinction for any buyer: SMA does not manufacture solar panels. Its entire product portfolio consists of solar inverters, hybrid inverters, battery inverters, and energy management software, sold under well-established product lines such as Sunny Boy, Sunny Tripower, and Sunny Central. Trina Solar (Trinasolar), by contrast, is a Chinese solar module manufacturer founded in 1997 and headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province. The company has shipped more than 292 GW of modules globally and operates annual manufacturing capacity exceeding 80 GW as of early 2026, placing it consistently among the world's top five module producers. Trina has achieved a 100% bankability rating in BloombergNEF's PV Module Bankability assessment for 2025 - its eighth consecutive year of unanimous recognition from all surveyed financial institutions - giving it the stronger institutional footprint on the module supply side.

SMA's inverter families span the full range of system scales: the Sunny Boy series targets residential rooftop systems, Sunny Tripower and Sunny Highpower address commercial and C&I applications, and Sunny Central serves utility-scale ground-mount plants. At Intersolar Europe 2026, SMA launched grid-forming inverters and new management software, deepening its role as a grid-integration specialist. Trina's module portfolio is anchored in n-type TOPCon cell technology across three market segments: the Vertex S+ series serves residential and small commercial rooftops, the Vertex N i-TOPCon Ultra targets larger C&I and commercial installations, and the Vertex NEG21 family - reaching up to 760 W at 24.5% efficiency according to pv-magazine - is designed for utility-scale ground-mount projects. Trina prices its modules at a slight discount to the market average, making high-efficiency TOPCon accessible to cost-sensitive buyers.

Framing SMA Solar and Trina Solar as competing alternatives is a category error: SMA provides the power conversion electronics while Trina provides the generating surface. In a typical solar installation these two brands are partners rather than rivals, and a Trina module paired with an SMA inverter is a common, bankable combination used on projects across Europe and internationally. Buyers evaluating modules should compare Trina against Jinko Solar or LONGi on efficiency, warranty terms, and local service coverage. Buyers evaluating inverters should compare SMA against Fronius or Huawei on conversion efficiency and grid-service capabilities. Neither brand is interchangeable with the other because they serve fundamentally different roles within the same system.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [SMA Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/sma-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [SMA Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/sma-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [SMA Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/sma-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/sma-solar-vs-trina-solar